MovieChat Forums > Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion > Just another active shooter, Killer and ...

Just another active shooter, Killer and Traitor to his people. Guilty as sin.


He not only went out to murder Americans, he went out to murder Americans fighting for our freedom.

Guilty as sin.

reply

Weird way of describing Neo-Bolsheviks, but okay.

reply

Why does everything always have to be with political affiliations with you people, huh? Sometimes I think you and your lot just love to use big words.

reply

Because that's what they were genius.

reply

You accidentally posted this here and not in the Baldwin subforum?

reply

He shot a convicted pedophile. Your move.

reply

Irrelevant. All that matters is that night.

reply


Where he shot a convicted pedophile. Who was attacking him. Who was there in a mob rioting, looting, and burning.

Honestly, the only people who will screw up any sympathy for him are other pedos or people fighting for the downfall of the American Republic.

reply

His criminal record is irrelevant. You people keep bringing up his past in an attempt to justify the shooting. The only thing that matters is that night.

A key witness says Rosenbaum was not a threat:

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-wisconsin-shootings-homicide-kenosha-376152e7942b06122dcf899f779b0057

"Witness: Kenosha victim was belligerent but no threat"

"KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — The first man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse on the streets of Kenosha was acting “belligerently” that night but did not appear to pose a serious threat to anyone, a witness testified Friday at Rittenhouse’s murder trial.

Jason Lackowski, a former Marine who said he took an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle to Kenosha last year to help protect property during violent protests against racial injustice, said that Joseph Rosenbaum “asked very bluntly to shoot him” and took a few “false steppings ... to entice someone to do something.”

reply

The first man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse on the streets of Kenosha was acting “belligerently” that night but did not appear to pose a serious threat to anyone..


That's a pretty big supposition, one that's easy to make when you're not the one being pursued in the middle of a riot.

Other witnesses say Rosenbaum was a direct threat.

“[Rosenbaum] was getting physically aggressive,” Hernandez, who was capturing video footage the night of the shooting, told the jurors.He testified that he watched Rosenbaum lead a charge of rioters into a gas station earlier in the evening. “He appeared to be attempting to start a physical altercation with people in the gas station to the point where he was telling one of the individuals with a rifle, ‘Shoot me, N-word, shoot me,'” Hernandez said. adding that he was “clearly attempting to start a physical altercation.”

https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/kyle-rittenhouse-opened-fire-seconds-after-hearing-gunshot-expert/

I don't know, I wasn't there. It's hard to say from where I sit whether Rosenbaum was a threat, or more importantly, whether Rittenhouse thought he was.

reply

Would you want to get into a fight with baldy child rapist knowing he had previously threatened to kill you?

Do you think he was chasing Kyle for a hug?

reply

You can kill people for chasing you now?

reply

You're seriously telling me that if you were Kyle, being chased all that distance by a clearly mentally unbalanced individual that has previously threatened to kill you, that could easily over power you if it came to grappling/fist fight, you wouldn't pull that trigger? Remove any "well I wouldn't have been there that night" from the equation. Imagine for whatever reason, an Alien transported your consciousness into Kyle that night. What would you do?

reply

I've been in plenty of fights. Several the result of being attacked. Managed not to kill a single person.

reply

People like you are so clueless. This is the most clear cut case of self defense I've ever seen.

reply

Self defense has to be proportionate. If it's not, you turn into the aggressor and can be charged with assault/battery or even murder. You know....like this trial?

reply

On what planet??? If you are armed with a rifle and a person attacks you, you defend yourself. You are not obligated to use the perpetrator's choice of weaponry. Is a woman obligated to defend herself against a rapist with her fists? No. Something else you people love to ignore, because you don't know any better, when you are in possession of a firearm, you are obligated to retain possession of that firearm. You do not get into a fist fight and lose control of your firearm. Like I said, clueless. This is basic knowledge.

reply

There's a joke in the UK that people sleep with a selection of items in their bedroom in case of a home invasion. A knife, a hammer, a cricket bat, a tyre iron, an umbrella, a screwdriver etc and they have to identify what the invader has and pick the item that is proportionate to what the invader is carrying.

reply

I can believe it!

reply

So you're saying you would sling your rifle and get into a fist fight? Despite your attacker having what, 50 lbs on you? Knowing if he got hold of your rifle he could carry out his threat and kill you?

reply

I wouldn't be at a riot, let alone be at a riot with a rifle.

You can't shoot someone because they are bigger than you. LOL, what is wrong with you?

reply

Thanks for clarifying you're retarded and can't read and answer a simple question.

reply

You're making a real habit out of being wrong.

reply

If t heir intent is to do you bodily harm, yes you can. He gave him no other choice.

reply

It's relevant since Rosenbaum might have intended to rape Rittenhouse after overpowering him. We know that Rosenbaum liked young boys and his girlfriend told him to leave the hotel room due to the restraining order. Rittenhouse was seventeen at the time and the legal age of consent in Wisconsin is eighteen.

reply

"It's relevant since Rosenbaum might have intended to rape Rittenhouse after overpowering him."

You have to be embarrassed posting this.

reply

Kyles way too old for Rosenbaum .

reply

Then there's no reason to bring up Kyle's past, yet everyone does.

reply

I didn't say shit about his past.

reply

Fighting for our freedom? You mean looting for themselves. How many businesses were destroyed by liberals over those three days? 30? 40? 50?

reply

I am longing for the next time some lib whines about "food deserts" or "lack of jobs" in black areas, so I can laugh and laugh and laugh at them .

reply

Those criminals who were burning down Kenosha were not heroes. Rittenhouse was filmed cleaning graffiti from the school, offering medical assistance to all and protecting the car dealership. Rosenbaum was on video challening people to shoot him, making threats and pushing a flaming dumpster toward police cars. Rosenbaum was also a pedophile so he might have been trying to rape Rittenhouse. Grosskreutz was from Milwaulkee and he had attended over 75 riots with some Antifa group. Huber was a bi-polar twenty-six year-old pothead skater boy who was also a domestic abuser.

In both moments when he had to defend, he was running away from aggressors instead of actively shooting. Instead of fighting for freedom, the mob in Kenosha burned and looted that town.

reply

"he went out to murder Americans fighting for our freedom."

That's not how you spell riot.

reply

he went out to murder Americans fighting for our freedom

You stupid troll idiot piece of shit. You are disrespecting all young boys who died on the battlefield so you can come on the internet to showcase the inbred bloodline you come from.

reply

Speaking of inbreeding, have you quit having sex with your mom?

reply

Fighting for freedom??? Whose freedom were they fighting for when they burned down businesses and assaulted innocent people?

reply

And yet somehow Antifa/BLM has never managed to actually kill anyone. Only right wingers kill people. Who are the real terrorists?

reply

Oh really??? I think you need to check your facts again.

reply

Yes I think you do. Now stfu kid.

reply

Craig never fully recovered from having his head squeezed with a pair of forceps at birth.

reply

I already suspected I was arguing with idiot teenagers. Thanks for the clarification.

reply

Kid? I just about guarantee I'm older than you are. At least two dozen people died in the BLM riots. What about the police that have been ambushed and murdered in the wake of all this "defund the police" nonsense? These two assholes were killed in self defense while in the commission of a felony. Why are you defending them?

reply

Correction: at the time, Crybaby Kyle Rottenhouse was committing a misdemeanor not a felony.

reply

Aggravated assault and battery, which is what the two dead perps were shot during the commission of, is a felony. Thanks for confirming that you are just a troll.

reply

If you’re older than me then that’s honestly pathetic, you have the reasoning skills of a middle-schooler. “2 dozen died during BLM riots,” what does this even mean? Did they die of heart attacks, drug overdoses, what? Your point is utterly vague. We’re talking about murder here. What police are being “ambushed”? Pretty sure that just comes with the territory. Tossing a plastic bag at someone and following them isn’t ground for self defense run my book. Rottenhouse could have stayed home and saved everyone the trouble.

reply

You are a horribly uninformed individual.

reply

The reasoning skills of a middle-schooler is giving young Craigy way too much credit.

reply

immattj is trying to hard to be a troll....

reply

Literally thousands of people were rightfully arrested, charged, tried, and sent to prison after the BLM riots. 1500 in LA alone. With no chorus of brain dead jackasses crying "bu-bu-butt dey didnt do nothin wrong!!! =("

reply

But you see, that logic doesn't work when the perp is a punk with an AR.

reply