MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Comprehensive Debate Poll Results From a...

Comprehensive Debate Poll Results From an Apparently Neutral News Network

posted 2 months ago by purplehorse (220)
16 replies | jump to latest

Google says WFLA news is slightly left leaning if anything. I'm not totally sure myself how true that is but if it is... then here are some results from a network that is probably more neutral than most. (I know Florida itself is now a red state... so I'm willing to bet this is pretty neutral overall.)

Here are the results.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K594Nm3R-Lc&t=26s

I time stamped all the polls to save time.

44:48 Opening Segment On Economy: Trump 85% Harris 15%

54:51 Baby Murder: Trump 81% Harris 19%

1:24:58 Immigration: Trump 72% Harris 28%

2:10:17 Foreign Policy: Trump 80% Harris 20%

3:51:26 The Overall Debate: Harris 51% Trump 49%

Pretty strange that Trump wins on every issue but then loses the debate itself... Could it be that people initially were thinking during the debate that Trump was winning but then the talking heads got in their ear when it was time to vote on who they thought won? It's unbelievable how impressionable people are. Because I believe they were probably watching the debate on ABC but voting with their phones on this polling site. So that means they would have been listening to the bullshit political commentators on the news networks after the debate was over. And they may have made an impression perhaps. I don't know. People are strange.

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

It's a good indication that Trump supporters are becoming less likely to vote for him.

They don't want to concede to Harris on any issue. But when one of the candidates virtually shits in their pants during the interview, it's no surprise that their prospective employers are not keen to endorse their fitness for the job.

[–] purplehorse (220) 2 months ago

The issues are what matter. The economy is what matters... the border policy and the foreign policy are what matter. Not whether or not you like the guy or not.

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

Sure. That's how it works usually. People never vote for the guy they like.

Trump's 2016 campaign was about how Clinton was a "nasty woman" that nobody likes, while he was a plucky, relatable underdog, somehow.

[–] greentimemusic (1069) 2 months ago

Yea really. You can't just vote for someone because you hate the other person.

2016 ... I just can't stand Hillary and she should be in jail. So I'm voting for Trump.

[–] tvfan (12729) 2 months ago

No, it's called rigging and shenanigans.

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

The "biased" MCs let Trump have the final word on every issue in the debate.

It's not their fault that Trump made a Jack ass of himself.

Do you seriously think they would rig the overall score and not rig all the individual scores as well? Man you're dense.

[–] tvfan (12729) 2 months ago

Because it was impossible for them to change the fact that he won every topic.

Not even fake news media could cover for her evasiveness, unanswered questions and non-stop lies.

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

How is it possible to rig the overall result but not possible to rig the results for individual points?

That's complete and utter nonsense.

[–] tvfan (12729) 2 months ago

Rigging is their specialty.

And yes, it is complete and utter nonsense since only the idiots still believe that she won the entire debate when she lost on every single topic.

She won the emotional and sentimental part of the debate. Too bad that's not going to fix the economy, the border crisis, the foreign policy, etc.

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

Cool story Bro.

If rigging is their speciality, how come they didn't rig the individual results that supposedly indicate that Trump won?

It's a simple question.

[–] tvfan (12729) 2 months ago

That's why:

Fact-Checking Harris and the ABC mods on abortion:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1834276665058353152/vid/avc1/480x852/iX7WZ88HNd9EJ_Fa.mp4?tag=16

Fact-Checking Harris on other topics:
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1834225106203082752/pu/vid/avc1/480x852/gBgLSwR1sOlWmmIo.mp4?tag=12

More lies from Harris, ABC and the Dems: "There is no Abdul. Trump made it up."
In 2021, before the botched withdrawal, Biden's CIA Director met with the same Abdul that they now claim doesn't exist.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1834605176117690368/pu/vid/avc1/640x360/piSY6I1ASMooEOfx.mp4?tag=12

US soldiers wonder what Kamala was talking about.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1834841856707805184/vid/avc1/724x720/uMsVKbiATz_KsDj-.mp4?tag=16

A counter of Kamala and Moderator lies:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1833964045277216768/vid/avc1/480x852/dtlO91ECjZjgM7At.mp4?tag=16

[–] BKB (9877) 2 months ago

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/what-taylor-swift-endorsement-vice-president-harris-means-election?dicbo=v2-nL9xZTl

Apparently, Swift endorsing Harris is not as big a deal as it's being made out to be and rightfully so because this bitch never did her research and was never going to endorse Trump, but now it's coming back to haunt her and will backfire. You watch

[–] Martoto (5024) 2 months ago

So why did Trump try to trick people into thinking Swift endorses him a few weeks ago?

[–] BKB (9877) 2 months ago

I just think it's fascinating how CNN claims Harris won the Debate with 63% to Trump's 37%, yet he Polls significantly higher than Harris when it comes to the handling of the Economy??

[–] tvfan (12729) 2 months ago

They can only push their lies and deception so far.

[–] greentimemusic (1069) 2 months ago

LOL baby murder.

Not, raped and forced to carry?