[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > [deleted]
These things you need to back them up, like:
1) How do you know the location of the shooter in relation to Trump?
2) How did you know he was a terrible shot? A link would be nice.
3) The reaction of secret service also someone else was killed, that looked pretty real. If you are offering a theory, at least give us something so we know why you think that. Because it was not Trump saying he was shot by a bullet, I think it was the statements of secret service.
[deleted]
Thanks for the link, that is indeed more detailed information.
And yes, the angle was weird, the shooter almost directly at the right side of Trump, and if his right ear was shot, his head could not have been intact.
Also what is concerning is that 2 of secret service snipers were already aiming at the shooter before the shots were fired. That is just kind of suspicious.
[deleted]
Indeed, thanks.
Though that does not explain why 2 police snipers let the shooter fire his gun, 5 ~ 8 times.
It was not they found the shooter then open fire, it looked like they were in that position, with tripod setup aiming at the position of shooter for a while.
According the person saw the whole thing, said in a video that they just looked at the guy climbed onto to the roof, and let him shoot, then killed him.
That fits very well to my theory that the police snipers were there with the knowledge of the shooter, and to make sure he is killed at the scene.
[deleted]
You're coming from the typical conspiracy-minded perspective that the government is all-knowing, all-seeing, and always flawless in their actions.
Humans are humans, the world is chaotic, and things rarely go perfectly to plan. Unexpected things happen. Oversights and incompetence exists.
I wonder when the last time these specific Secret Service members actually dealt with a real-world scenario like this, if ever? One of the women had trouble holstering her gun she was so rattled.
People have trouble imagining that a single lone nut can dramatically alter history, which is why JFK conspiracies are still so prevalent even today, but it's a bitter pill you're going to have to swallow. The world is messy, and no one is fully in control.
Yeah, certainly wasn't a bullet: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GSaDvF6XYAA7rR1?format=jpg&name=large
(Credit: Doug Mills, White House press corps)
How much money did you want to bet again?
$5? :)
shareWhat did you mean by "projectile"? A "projectile" is a bullet.
"Any bullet that touches the right-side ear is going through Don's skull from that angle."
Where do you get that?! Some movie?
If you meant a fragment of something that was hit by a bullet and richoched to hit his ear, there's nothing nearby that's close enough to explain that.
And, do you really think "Donnie" set up that scenario himself, just so that he could let a kid fire a high-powered rifle at him, with the very high probability that he'd get his brains blown out?
Use your head.
[deleted]
I think you are unable to accept reality anytime it deviates from what you want it to be.
shareWell...you're certainly wrong about that part! I came here to delete my posts...I now feel after seeing the photo of the bullet in the air that I was incorrect in my assumption. So perhaps I'm wrong. The angle didn't look right to me. Getting that good of a shot off in the circumstances didn't feel right to me. But apparently I was incorrect. I'm man enough to say it.
share