This is a fraud trial. Donald Trump is on trial for fraudulently using money give as a campaign donation. No porn star is on trial. No porn star is pressing charges against Trump. A porn star just happens to have received hush money that was fraudulently used from campaign donations. Fraudulent use of campaign donations is a crime.
If it's just a porn start thing then why doesn't the defence attorney simply move for dismissal on the basis that they are in court for the wrong thing. Should be easy and simple enough.
Watergate was just a "third rate burglary" by some gung ho Nixon supporters. But for some reason, when it was discovered, the special prosecutor, FBI and Department Of Justice were concerned with the fact that emerged that Nixon ordered it and other break ins to happen and then covered it up with cash donated to his election campaign by unwitting supporters who did not know they were bankrolling criminals. And then obstructed the FBI from discovering the involvement in the break ins, the money paid to the "burglars" to do said break ins and to keep quiet about it, and so on and so on... And they called the investigators "obsessed" then too.
reply
share
BKB (11304)
10 months ago
It's a trial involving a has been Porn Star while wasting Tax Payer's hard earned $$$$$ instead of this fat ass black prosecutor who looks like Fat Albert from the cartoon in the 70's should be prosecuting murderers instead of this garbage and the worst part of this is?? Is Alvin Braggs is going to have to prove without a shadow of doubt that all of these frivolous charges against Trump stick and they won't.. They barely can scrape together a Jury who's not biased (Supposedly) just to take the time out for this crap.. All of this is done out of Politics to keep him from winning in November and he will too!! It's over dude.. Admit Trump's going to be your New Daddy after November 5th.. π
reply
share
Martoto (5191)
10 months ago
She's only involved as the person who received money that Trump fraudulently used.
This is probably costing the taxpayer considerably less than Trump defrauded his supporter's donations. And it will save them a lot more than that when he's found guilty.
You fucking dumbasses think that everyone who sees what you ignore about D Trump is A) a dem b) and American. Makes you look so fucking stupid, over and above the basic stupidity.
reply
share
BKB (11304)
10 months ago
Dude, you can argue this from now til the sun goes down tonight, but in the end, if Trump weren't running for President and poised to win in November, you wouldn't have heard shit about this along with the other worthless indictments
reply
share
Martoto (5191)
10 months ago
If Trump hadn't fraudulently used his supporters donations to pay a former porn star none of this would be happening.
reply
share
Information-Police (4896)
10 months ago
"They barely can scrape together a Jury who's not biased". It took them 2 or 3 days to get their jury.
It took 2 months to get a trial for OJ Simpson.
reply
share
Information-Police (4896)
10 months ago
To be clear, the "Watergate scandal" was about a lot more than the Watergate break-in and its cover-up. Nixon's operatives had been carrying out many illegal activities , such as breaking into a psychiatrists office to get info that would discredit a political enemy. The cover-up was to stop the whole operation from being discovered.
reply
share