Trump hadn't been President yet, so what would you think would have happened if he lost? Would he still have tried to do a similar Jan 6 "insurrection" protest somewhere, unlike when he was President?
sharemore than likely Trump would have ran again in 2020 but would have lost again because the dems would have rigged the election for hillary. Hillary would have been pres for 8 years, the only upside would have been no covid and the house I was wanting to buy wouldnt cost $350k.
sharethe only upside would have been no covid and the house I was wanting to buy wouldnt cost $350k.
A lot would depend on how badly he lost. If it was close enough, it might still have made the point to the nation, that working class whites could be mobilized and be an effective base.
And he, or someone inspired by him might try against in 2020.
By then, Hillary would be.... man, one can only imagine how bad of a President she would have been. She is such a bitch.
Hillary would be.... man, one can only imagine how bad of a President she would have been. She is such a bitch.
There would still have been a plandemic; however, it would have been gradual with years of lockdowns while been injected with enough poison to kill billions instead of millions as part of their Agenda-21/2030 depopulation.
shareIt's been over three years since Trump lost spectacularly in 2020 but you are still going on about the 2020 election being rigged. You claim to have evidence that Trump won in 2020 but for some reason you refuse to post that evidence. What are you waiting for, Gomer? Why hasn't anyone else provided proof of a rigged election? Your stupidity and gullibility continues.
shareno proof that Trump lost. what happened to the chicanery?
shareThat doesn't even make sense? Do you even know what chicanery means?
shareDo you ever provide anything meaningful or of substance besides playing with words?
shareOf course! Just because you and I will be voting for different people in November (I'm assuming you are old enough to vote), does not mean that the arguments I have made are not meaningful or somehow lack substance. Similarly, the fact that the statement I was responding to was incoherent, does not mean that I was "playing with words."
shareThanks for proving and confirming my point. LMAO
shareYour point is that anyone who disagrees with you couldn’t possibly have anything substantive to say?
When someone says something good about Trump, do you consider whether or not it makes sense, or do you just repeat it because you want it to be true?
Thanks for proving and confirming my point. LMAO
Well, that gambling company that paid out early based on a Clinton win would not have had to ask for their money back.
That must have cost them a fortune.
"Trump hadn't been President..."
And had his campaign in '16 not been successful, he would've remained a D-List reality star