Quinnipiac Poll says Biden is at 53% to 40% over Trump

Certainly:

http://massivevoterfraud.com
News reports started circulating that Hillary Clinton actually won the popular vote over Donald Trump, by over 3 million votes.

That just didn’t make sense to us. How could Hillary Clinton get 3 million more votes than Donald Trump, yet Hillary still lose the election so badly?

Massive Voter Fraud!

It looks like obvious massive voter fraud took place in the 2016 presidential election, targeting President Trump to delegitimize his landslide election. And we are here to provide proof that Hillary Clinton cheated to gain illegal votes in many states.

We will provide proof that massive voter fraud occurred during the election. We have already confirmed millions of illegal votes, many even coming from dead people!

With our calculations, from November 9th, 2016 until today, we have concluded that over 2 million votes were illegal. Our final calculations should be finalized at the end of July, 2017.

Our predictions show that there should be close to 3,109,405 illegal votes cast in 2016’s presidential election, with 98.45% of the illegal votes being cast for Hillary Clinton.

How Do We Know These Votes Were Illegal?

We have a lot of connections in the voting system. We know clerks that have given us access to INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
Gregg Phillips understands what’s happening in our voting system.

The illegally cast ballots could have come from any or all of the states listed below, as they do not require any form of ID to vote.
*California
*Illinois
*Iowa
*Maine
*Maryland
*Massachusetts
*Minnesota
*Nebraska
*Nevada
*New Jersey
*New Mexico
*New York
*North Carolina
*Oregon
*Pennsylvania
*Vermont
*West Virginia
*Wyoming
*Washington, D.C.

https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/new-report-exposes-thousands-illegal-votes-2016-election

The Government Accountability Institute was able to obtain voter registration and voter history data from only 21 states because while some states shared it freely, “others impose exorbitant costs or refuse to comply with voter information requests.”

These 21 states represent “about 17 percent of all possible state-to-state comparison combinations.”

The Institute compared the lists using an “extremely conservative matching approach that sought only to identify two votes cast in the same legal name.” It found that 8,471 votes in 2016 were “highly likely” duplicates.

Extrapolating this to all 50 states would likely produce, with “high-confidence,” around 45,000 duplicate votes.

The Institute obtained this level of confidence by matching not only names and birthdays—which can be the same for different individuals—but also by contracting with companies, such as Virtual DBS, that have commercial databases to further cross-check these individuals using their Social Security Numbers and other information.

According to the Government Accountability Institute’s experts, “the probability of correctly matching two records with the same name, birthdate, and social security number is close to 100 percent.” In fact, “using these match points will result in virtually zero false positives.”

The probability of 45,000 illegal duplicate votes is the low end of the spectrum, and it does not even account for other types of fraud such as ineligible voting by noncitizens and felons and absentee ballot fraud.

To put this number of fraudulent votes in perspective, Hillary Clinton won New Hampshire by fewer than 3,000 votes out of over 700,000 cast. Just this number of duplicate votes alone has the power to swing state results and, in turn, elections.

Unfortunately, New Hampshire refused to turn over their data for this study.

Jerky!

Outdoor event - sure will.