Aren't Democrats being HUGE hypocrites?
They say they oppose putting children in cages, yet they want to put Donald Trump in prison.
Trump is often childish, but he's not a child.
share
MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Aren't Democrats being HUGE hypocrites?
Child-like vs child, but he is overdue for a spanking.
shareThey also claim to care about children, but embrace post birth abortions aka murder
Claim they are about poor people, but jack up taxes
[deleted]
2016 Democrat presidential hopeful, Hillary Rodham Clinton is so extreme on abortion that she once defended the horrific partial birth abortion procedure
https://www.charismanews.com/politics/issues/51377-hillary-clinton-defended-gruesome-partial-birth-abortion-as-a-fundamental-right
Maga Moron wrote:
"No one supports "post birth abortions"
Uninitiated and ill-informed, are we? The Democrats are running on this platform. Would you like me to cite sources?
[deleted]
(@38:45)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6WD_3H0wKU
https://twitter.com/i/status/1090379242771165184
[deleted]
Respectfully, I don't think you've watched the videos, or you didn't pay attention. Simply put, you're wrong, which is amazing because the proof is in both of the videos. I've even given you a time-stamp. I'm tempted to write out a transcript, but I'm sure you'll somehow, miraculously weasel your way out since you're blinded by truth. Simply amazing for all the wrong reasons.
EDIT: They guy in the first vid talks about comforting the baby (post-birth) while having a discussion with the mother in the other room. Unbelievable how you can say this is not post-birth (@40:09).
[deleted]
Good job. I gave you two time-stamps that are both within a 30 second span and you refuse to watch and listen to the facts coming straight from the horse's mouth. Im impressed.
share[deleted]
"It clearly states they are talking about abortions up until the mother is in labour."
"The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother..."
I still can't comprehend how you missed this. But I will watch Capernaum, so thanks for the recommendation, sincerely.
[deleted]
Lol, yes, he is an idiot. I'm glad we can agree on that. And yes, at 40:09 he says the quote that I posted.
I understand what you're saying about Capernaum and abortion, but I disagree. I think the rights of the unborn and having the resources to sustain them are two completely different issues. But, that's just my .02. I will give it a watch though. It's $15 on Amazon (yikes!), but I'm sure I can find it on ebay for cheap. Thanks again.
You're all uninformed......
Roe v Wade ruled that abortion is a privacy issue when the pregnancy is not viable. Not viable = 1st trimester and the start of the 2nd trimester (4th and 5th months) = her choice because the fetus is not viable. (Nevertheless, 1st trimester abortion is regulated and has restrictions. Almost all abortions are this stage.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Back in the 1970's, the 5th month (2nd trimester, 20 weeks) was considered not viable, today it can be, which is why various Republican-controlled states have been trying to amend (not create new laws) pre-existing abortion bans from 22 weeks (almost 6 months) to 20 weeks (5 months).
Abortion in 6th month (2nd trimester) is restricted to when the mother's life or the unborn's life is in danger, unborn is already dead, or rape/incest. This is heavily regulated. Partial-birth abortion was this stage and was banned.
Abortions in the 3rd trimester are 99.9999999% prohibited (and just as rare) and prosecuted as fetal homicide. Legitimate cases of medical emergencies requiring an abortion at this stage may happen but are extremely rare and require two doctors to greenlight. The Virginia State Delegate Kathy Tran offered a bill not to legalize 3rd trimester abortion but to make it legal for only one doctor to greenlight a medical emergency abortion. The state legislature refused to consider the bill and nothing more.
Thanks for the informative post, but that doesn't address the issue between MagaMoron and myself.
share"but that doesn't address the issue between MagaMoron and myself."
It does because you're both lying about abortion, both of your premises are lies, nobody is running on a platform of 3rd trimester abortion and abortion at the point of birth is illegal and prosecuted
You havent watched the clips I posted, have you? Post-birth abortion is being pushed.
share"You havent watched the clips"
Youtube clips are not laws or reality, nobody is running on that platform and the laws do not in any way support that platform, most Americans are opposed to abortion, hence the reason why abortion in the US is almost entirely restricted to the 1st trimester and extremely difficult to get permission for in the 2nd trimester and pretty much impossible in the 3rd.
Forgive me. I made the mistake of assuming you were aware of The Reproductive Health Act signed in by Andrew Cuomo this past January which allows abortion up to 40 weeks. It's no longer about it being safe and rare, as it is about access now.
Would you like a link to the bill?
Look up black shoe polish face in Virginia.
share[deleted]
You wrote:
No one supports "post birth abortions"
-----------------------------
In that post I responded to, you didn't say one word about taxes.
"Black shoe polish face" is referring to (former PEDIATRICIAN), Virginia Governor Ralph Northam. It was about him supporting infanticide! He's a sicko yet people are up in arms over some shoe polish he wore on his face decades ago but no outrage over killing babies! That's the logical liberals for ya.
The Republicans still can't separate "Pro-Choice" from "Pro-abortion". Pathetic.
shareNo one embraces abortions.
And are you really so stupid as to believe that Democrats & liberals are the only ones supporting, having & performing abortions?
Reagan jacked up taxes 13 times.
Just give up, BAElick.
No one embraces abortions.
Look at the shirt. The woman smiling behind her was the head of Planned Parenthood.
https://churchpop.com/2017/01/22/was-the-womens-march-really-neutral-on-abortion/
Here, the crowd cheers the star's "first abortion".
https://truthfeednews.com/video-hollywood-actress-celebrates-her-abortion-it-was-my-best-one/ share
"No one embraces abortions."
Ever heard of "Shout your abortion"? This was pretty big about a year ago.
In addition, here's an example of someone embracing abortion
(@00:15)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkyvVSge-_8
"...I also had my first abortion at the Seattle Planned Parenthood. Yaaaay!" *crowd cheers*
They still can't figure out what "Pro-Choice" means. After all these years.
shareWhat the hell are you talking about? We should at least put rabid dogs in prison, if not just shoot them. That what DJT is, a rabid dog. He doesn't think, he doesn't lead, he just wants something in front of him and doesn't care what he's left behind him.
share