[deleted]
[deleted]
Gross.
share
MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > [deleted]
First, define evil. All of the spokesliars are liars by definition. All of Obama's were, too. Remember how Benghazi was caused by an unfortunate video? All of them are full of manure -- no one knew where Obama was during Benghazi, except that he wasn't doing his job. Not all of them have a severe medical condition that only a real jerk would make fun of. But hey, some people have gaping holes where their sense of right and wrong should be so they have to ridicule people with severe medical problems.
Now do encephalitis.
No.
Press Secretaries are paid by the taxpayers. It's their duty to tell the truth - be it filtered with the Administration's messaging.
Stop with the Benghazi thing, will you? There WAS an anti-Mohammed video released prior to the MULTIPLE attacks on the Anniversary of 9/11. It was called "Innocence of Muslims" & the authors of the video still have not explained why they released it - unfinished - directly to the internet at a volatile time on a night of chaos across the continent, across the Arab world.
And bullshit. They DO know where Obama was during "Benghazi" - or are you saying that Obama secretly flew to Libya & personally killed Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods & Glenn Doherty? Adjust your tin foil hat.
The REPUBLICANS held 10 investigations after 60 committee meetings on Benghazi. No indictments. So you're saying that Republicans are just too incompetent to get to the truth that you want?
The jerkiest Press Secretary - prior to Sarah Huckabee - was Dana Perino. Someone asked her a question that referred to The Bay of Pigs. She said she didn't know what the Bay of Pigs was because - get this - SHE HADN'T BEEN BORN YET.
And lest anyone accuse me of attacking female Press Secretaries, let me state that CJ Cregg was the best that there ever was - one step ahead of Pierre Salinger.
Encephalitis is an inflammation of the brain. Dearie, you need not to worry you'll suffer from it. One has to have an actual BRAIN to get it.
Woah! They're hired by the President at the time, and it's their duty to make that President look good. The White House communications office is not about transparency; it's about them getting their spin on things just as the press gets their spin on things.
"Stop with the Benghazi thing, will you? There WAS an anti-Mohammed video released prior to the MULTIPLE attacks on the Anniversary of 9/11." Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc -- just because a video was released prior to the attack on the Ambassador doesn't mean it caused it. The Obama Administration's story was that it wasn't an organized attack, that it was a "demonstration" that got out of hand. Folks pointed out they brought some pretty heavy artillery to a mere "demonstration." Hilariously, even Wikipedia knows it wasn't just a demonstration that got out of hand by now: "The 2012 Benghazi attack was a coordinated attack against two United States government facilities in Benghazi, Libya by members of the Islamic militant group Ansar al-Sharia." In other fallacies, I enjoyed the ad hominem attacks and the cute little strawmen!
"And bullshit. They DO know where Obama was during 'Benghazi'...." Yes, supposedly he saw things beginning to unfold into a dangerous situation for all Americans involved, and he announced he couldn't think of a better time to get some shut-eye -- then left the room for some serious plausible deniability. Some of us have a hard time thinking that little of him.
Me, I hate it when either side hides behind, "No indictments." Not quite the same as "No wrongdoing."
I said that WHPS filter their Administration's messaging. Did you not comprehend that?
I said it's their duty to tell the truth. You disagree?
I did not say that the video caused the Benghazi attack. Did you comprehend that I said it did?
I said that the producers of that video never explained why they chose that chaotic week when protests were rampant across North Africa to release their unfinished video.
I asked whether the Republicans who spent lots of time & money (more time & money than was spent on 9/11 investigations) were incompetent because they did not come to the conclusion which you still maintain. I did NOT mention that GOP Rep McCarthy bragged about using those investigations to 'get Hillary's numbers down.' You still seem to think Obama & Hillary had something to do with the Benghazi raid. Does that make you incompetent, complicit or just dense?
Did your Wiki source indicate the multitudes of OTHER protests that night? Did it identify the producers of the video? Did it mention that the CIA, DIA, NSA & the Office of Terrorism & Financial Intelligence had all provided top Obama officials with reports & that the video was mentioned in every one? Did it identify sources of just what time Obama went to bed the night of the raid or if he slept? Did it say that when Susan Rice met the press that weekend that she used the information she was given by US Intelligence agencies & that it WASN'T information that the Obama Administration had just conjured up?
It wasn't their "STORY."
You've consumed & repeated ALLL the conspiracy talking points spewed by InfoWars & Breitbart, haven't you? They vomit them to the cosmos, you lap them up & you regurgitate them.
You, Destinata, are the prime example of why having a little information can be a bad thing. I've seen you attack others here on these boards for not reading for comprehension - yet time & again you prove to be incapable of understanding what words in sentences actually mean.
QED
Everything I've read points to two groups involved in the Benghazi attack. The main provocateurs were a group named BOAR, the Brigades of Abdul Rahman, who attacked as vengeance for the imprisoned Blind Sheik Rahman. The second group, who joined in the attack after BOAR started it, was Ansar Al Sharia. Their leader, Kattala, admitted they attacked because of the video. So even though the main attack was not because of the video, there is evidence that the video did play a small part in the attack.
shareI would have to agree, its the chicken and the egg theory. Did the video cause the attack or did the terrorists just attack on their own. I don't think we will ever know.
shareBut it's republicans who are saying the video played no part. Republicans were also saying that democrats brought up the video to somehow shift the blame away from Islamic terror which never made sense. Republicans thought they had a gotcha moment but like always it hit them back in their ignorant faces.
shareThat reminds me of the current democrats who are trying to get a "gotcha" with Trump. Its been 2 years and we still have nothing. They are just making our country look stupid with their stupid faces.
shareTrump's attorney, Trump's campaign manager and Trump's national security advisor are all facing charges for that thing you call a "gotcha." If only republicans had that much when investigating Benghazi for, not 2, but 4 years.
shareYup, 2 years of nothing burgers and wasting tax payers money. I heard the investigation has cost over $500m so far.
shareWow did you hear Sean Hannity wrong!
No waste of taxpayers money - this investigation is actually showing a multi-million dollar profit for taxpayers. The money spent has already been earned back thanks to the assets Manafort and Cohen have forfeited.
MAGA will win
shareNot on this site it wont.
shareI know it wont but I am still trying.
shareIt worked on Culburn. He got banned.
shareOh yeah, whatever happened to him? What was the story?
shareSame thing that happened to the stock market this week. He fell and he can't get back up.
shareThe stock market also fell up when Trump took over. MAGA?
shareWell it continued it's upward trend that was happening under Obama. Since Trump took credit for each gain that the Dow has taken over the past couple years, does he not also have to accept responsibility for all the recent losses?
shareYou’ve been quiet this week with the 1300+ points lost. Wonder why.
shareHe started a post called Hussein Obama. It got deleted in a few days and then Culburn got banned.
shareOh wow, thats turrible. He was a good man and patriot.
shareFirst, it didn't get deleted in a few days, he bumped the post for weeks if not months adding no new content to it, the sole purpose to remind everyone of Barack Obama's Arabic middle name as if that alone was something to be ashamed of.
Second, he posted here for some time after the moderators publicly told him to stop bumping that thread. So I'm not sure what he got banned for, but it wasn't that.
No new content has been added to this thread as well and yet it hasn't been deleted. Its ironic that you can't say Obamas middle name yet its ok to make fun of woman. Even though its a fake thing.
shareNo idea what you’re talking about dude.
shareWait wut? You just explained to me what happened, now you have no idea whats happening?
shareThere is new content here. This conversation for example is new content. Culburn continuously himself bumped the H.O. thread adding literally nothing new and his posts admitted he was doing it simply to not allow it to fall to page 2 or beyond. The moderators deemed this to be trolling which it clearly was. Really fuckin simple and you know full well he was trolling and deserved a warning for it.
Did you report this thread? Maybe check in with a moderator if you think it should be deleted. You are somewhat responsible for it being bumped since you've responded to posts in this thread weeks later moving this back to the first page.
[deleted]
If you report it, then it will probably be deleted.
shareLib stories dont get deleted.
shareHere, too? 🤦🏼♀️
shareWomen are constantly attacked on this board, that is except if they are democrats.
shareI always thought you were a guy for some reason.
Ah well, you're still being presumptuous for thinking anyone attacks you because of your gender. You're also playing gender victim.
I'm used to that. I make a post and the lads pile on. They always come off as fifteen year olds who want to act big, or thirty to forty year olds with a case of arrested development. They think R-rated language makes them sound tough.
shareYou are such a fraud. The OP didn't give Sarah the codename. The Secret Service did. Bubba is using this thread to whine that women are somehow mistreated on this board, and you join his snowflake academy by implying you've experienced it firsthand.
Sometimes R-rated language is appropriate, because frauds like you spew so much bullshit.
The secret service never did, there is no truth to that statement.
T. Rafael CiminoVerified account
@TRafaelCimino
HBO Films Writer/Executive Producer, CNN Political Contributor and former "Real Time with Bill Maher" writer. #HBO #BillMaher @HBOGO @HBO @BillMaher @CNN
On Nov 8 @TRafaelCimino tweeted: "FUN FACT: @SarahHuckabee has uncontrolla.." - read ... For the first 6 mos. her Secret Service code name was “Deuce.
@TRafaelCiminoi s the person that tweeted that false statement.
I agree burden of proof is on the one making the claim, but the OP isn't responsible for Sarah's codename.
Also, it's amazing how much protection Huckers gets when Trump has said something hideous about every woman that ever gave him the tiniest of criticism.
All of this "outrage" looks like subterfuge for the fact neither Trump nor Huckers can explain why the government should shut down over a wall that Mexico is supposed to pay for.
I always thought the burden of proof was on the reader? Then that makes everything I say true until proven false. I like this new turn of events.
I agree burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Trump never said anything bad about anyone. Trump loves everyone and America.
[deleted]
2) Another poster thought Destinata was a guy. That reflects the silent misogyny of assuming a female couldn't possibly engage in logical and winning debates. She has no need of playing the gender card or any other one than the ace of queens that is her intelligence.
There is no such thing as an "ace of queens". An ace and a queen are two different cards and they each come in four suits (clubs, spades, hearts, diamonds). share
[deleted]
Too bad. It sounded pretty. I guess that's one of those things that separates the XX's from the XY's.
Nah come on, most women I know are familiar with how a deck of cards is structured. If you're trying to argue for "true equality" for females, I'd suggest not trying to hide behind your sex when you make an error regarding items most people become familiar with as children (such as a deck of cards). "Ace of queens" was a relatively minor goof on your part but that "XX's from the XY's" line was just a sad excuse lol. share
[deleted]
Umm no. To say I'm astonished by civility is to suggest I was somehow uncivil to you which wasn't the case.
shareLibs are not civil, and they hate Republican women.
shareNope, I wasn’t uncivil in any way and I don’t hate Republican women. It was a nice broad statement but completely inaccurate.
shareThe Trumpflake tears just keep a comin. While repubs are forced to hear mean words during dinner, dems are falsely charged of assault and receiving bombs in the mail.
sharedlancer
" ...then every politician who aligns with him deserves what they get as far as having their feelings hurt."
Theres your sign.
Bubbathesnowflake
Well I see you've completely pivoted from the misogyny narrative. Smart move.
But if you are going to say the relatives of legal immigrants are rapists and drug dealers, and that only some, you think, are good people, then you deserve to have your feelings hurt.
If you are going to say there are good people on both sides when one side was murdered, then you deserve to have your feelings hurt.
Only snowflakes like you believe somebody is above having hurt feelings. Except it's even worse with you because you only care when it's republican hurt feelings.
1) True, R-rated language is typically vulgar, but any 'instant R-rated' language gets zapped when reported. All the language that stays on this board is suitable for PG-13. "Fuck" is allowed in PG-13 provided it's not in a sexual context and not repeated often enough. That is also how you find it on this board, unless you upset Satan and he pulls out the motherf'er, lol. So in essence, complaining about the language on this board, when it is suitable for PG-13, is just another example of someone being a snowflake.
2) Oh no no. You don't get to pull the silent misogyny crap on an internet forum. For the record, I never assumed Destinata was a dude. I assumed the possibility of female because of the name ending in A, but the reality is we are all anonymous here. Not everyone is putting their gender out there like you are, and as such it leaves the door wide open to misinterpret your gender. That's all part of the anonymity you gain from this kind of forum. If you're going to partake in that anonymity, your whines will fall on deaf ears when people assume incorrectly something they cannot see.
3) You are assuming the "big cats" here are dudes which makes you guilty of the very thing you are condemning. But I agree with the assumption because most times it's all we have to go on. Also, stating your gender in some cases can be pointless. The same goes for stating your wealth or education. Nobody can know if you are telling the truth. It's all part of the anonymity given by this forum.
[deleted]
If you're referring to me, I did not assume Destinata was a guy.
If you scroll up you'll see I was replying to Bubba. I assumed 'Bubbathegut' was a guy because it sounds like a male moniker. Have you ever known a female that referred to herself as 'Bubba'? I personally have not. But I guess there's a first for everything and I'll gladly admit that I was wrong to make presumptions on her gender based on what she chooses to call herself.
[deleted]
"I play with numerous female "big cats" in business so now you're assuming."
Am I? Okay, let's see.
"If we females want true equality, we must be armed to play center ring with the big cats and not whine when we are wounded."
Hmmm, so "big cats" in this context include females who have already become big cats? If that was the case, then "true equality" has already been obtained, and being armed to play center ring with them already achieved. Kinda makes the whole sentence null and void, doesn't it? Now if your "big cats" were to refer to men, the sentence instantly becomes a logical statement. Not necessarily correct, but logical.
Sure you wanna double down on this whole thing?
[deleted]
"Sadly, many successful females often don't support those coming up the ladder."
But that's not an example of female inequality. Women in higher-up positions eat their own just as men do in the dog-eat-dog world in which we live. You've clearly pivoted from your original statement.
"the Tweeter's nepotistic entrée into show business"
Sounds like show business all right.
"or the fact that Sarah Sanders neither had nor needed an SS detail until she was harassed at dinner and elsewhere."
She didn't need it after she was harassed either, but wasting money on SS is an easy way to publicize the false idea that the left are more prone to violence against women.
"then every politician who aligns with him deserves what they get as far as having their feelings hurt while dining in restaurants. "
This is what dancer had to say about the 2 women who were kicked out of restaurants for being Republican. We live in a sad time now that when a person won't defend a woman even if she is a Republican. Ironically all the liberals quickly came to the defense of Blasey-Ford for being attacked. Pam Bondi was harassed at a movie theater and liberals seem to be ok with this just because she is a Republican.
What happened to those female republicans is the same thing that happened to Ted Cruz and Milo Yiannopoulos. Last time I checked, they aren't women.
You are pretending to agree with the feminazi crowd by claiming it's unfair treatment to women, but your real motive is to criticize liberals for making republicans feel unwanted during meals. Attempting to warp the latter into the former is going to require a lot more mental gymnastics than you are capable of.
Of course, that is why you don't reply directly to me. You are fully aware your posts are full of hot air just as when you tried to defend the coverage of caravans as not being a scare tactic.
#1. No one cares whether SS has IBS or not. Probably just something stupid someone came up with to be rude.
#2. Being a willing mouth-piece for a dumb-ass like Trump is going to bring scorn on your head. Being asked to leave a restaurant is not akin to being assaulted for sexual gratification. Sorry if she was inconvenienced, but she's aligned herself with sickness, and a restaurateur claims to have the right to refuse service to anyone. If SS wants a Liberal to make a cake to honor a wrong-winger, it's the cake makers right to decline. I don't have to bake a cake for you, you don't have to take my money to serve me food. SS is not an unfortunate who is simply trying to make her way in the world. She's an advocate for Imperialism, Autocracy, whatever else we can throw at her boss. It's pitiful, and if she can't find a crowd that accepts her, that's her problem. I don't want to be in the same room with one of Saddam Hussein's minions, so one of us will have to leave.
Yeah it's a good thing Sean Spicer wasn't a woman or he would've been criticized week after week on SNL... oh wait.
shareDon't want the truth out abt your girlfriend Sarah? LOL
shareROFL!
shareYou DO know you sound like a bratty 'tween, right? Unless you're doing a parody, this doesn't help your cause.
shareYes, make fun of someone's physical disability. Unbelievable. Even more unbelievable is that they don't understand there's anything wrong with it.
I hope you're doing well, pretty lady.
Who's making fun of a disability? Is having a hidden malady the same as having a disability? Sure, Sarah is likely mentally challenged because of her career choices, but I don't think that's at the root of our dismissal. She's just so dumb that she put herself in an atmosphere that she won't be a able to control how people react to her rubber stamping of her boss' nonsensical rants. Unless I were a WH journalist, I wouldn't want to be in the same room with her, and if I were a restaurateur, I would tactfully suggest she go elsewhere to a more accepting clime.
sharethats what libs are good at, making fun of people
shareBut you found it funny when Trump referred to Adam Schiff as "little Adam Schitt"? I hate name calling on either side but please explain why you don't have a problem with the Republican President making fun of people but you expect liberals on an internet message board to be held to higher standard than him?
shareFirst of all, the Sanders story is fake. I did 5 minutes of research to find that out. Secondly, I was laughing at the reference not the person. And lastly, liberals on here constantly mock Trump for the color of his skin. Can you imagine what would happen if people here said the same thing about Obama?
I hold liberals to a higher standard because they think they are better than Republicans, yet they say and do the same thing Rep. are doing.
posted 3 days ago by Doggiedaddy (4893)
On Thanksgiving Day, President T-rump lied about Hillary Clinton to defend his senior adviser / daughter /possible mistress Ivanka.
If liberals are truly better than Rep. then why do they say things like this?
I hold liberals to a higher standard because they think they are better than Republicans, yet they say and do the same thing Rep. are doing
Republicans claim to be the party of family values and patriotism yet they support a man who after unapologetically cheating on his first two wives, unapologetically cheated on his 3rd wife with a porn star (unprotected mind you) while his newlywed wife and newborn son were at home and then said "American stupidity" was to blame for poor U.S./Russia relations. So if you're looking for hipocrisy you may want to at least acknowledge some on your own side of the aisle.
As for the comment you listed, I am not Doggiedaddy and am not responsible for what he or any other liberal may say. I think the name calling is very lame personally and counter-productive to what people who oppose Trump should stand for. I'm not a hypocrite and have no problem calling out immature behavior when I see it. I've told Doggie my thoughts on his use of name calling before but ultimately he speaks for himself alone and is not the spokesperson for all liberals. The President on the other hand, by the very nature of his position, is a spokesperson for the Republican Party. So I don't understand your unwillingness to criticize the President when he behaves so poorly if you are truly against bad behavior as you claim to be. share
#libsawesome
shareThe collective "WE" in your statement didn't include ME or your actual statement for that matter. LOL.
SO, why is that evil fat pig full of shit? Why is she full of shit? Somehow we must assume from your statement that she is in fact full of shit, without any proof. FINE. But how do we know that she is full of shit? Your statement is complete FAIL. COMPLETE.
As a wise orange man once said, they aren't sending their best.
Uh, Sarah Sanders being full of shit doesn't need to be assumed. It's a demonstrable fact that she's peddled lies at her press conferences. When former secretaries haven't known the answer or can't reveal the answer they're forthcoming that they won't answer the question. At the very worst, they'll stonewall. When Sarah Sanders doesn't know the answer or doesn't want to reveal the answer ... she'll gaslight. She's the most dishonest press secretary in recent history and it's not even close. She has no credibility. But you'd never know it only watching Fox and OAN.
shareT. Rafael CiminoVerified account
@TRafaelCimino
HBO Films Writer/Executive Producer, CNN Political Contributor and former "Real Time with Bill Maher" writer. #HBO #BillMaher @HBOGO @HBO @BillMaher @CNN
On Nov 8 @TRafaelCimino tweeted: "FUN FACT: @SarahHuckabee has uncontrolla.." - read ... For the first 6 mos. her Secret Service code name was “Deuce.
This was tweeted by a Democrat, interesting fun fact.
[deleted]
No kidding, liberal Hollywood anyone?
share[deleted]
Are you seriously going to blame Sanders for a burden on our tax bill? Now I am speechless.
share[deleted]
Thanks for the heads up. I've seen the word Invizio but not sure what it is. Is it a pharmaceutical drug of some kind?
Sanders fell in with the wrong crowd, that's on her. Whatever fallout there is, she should have seen it coming.
If you want to ignore 30 witless heathens, go ahead. You sound like Shakespeare's Lear, who wants to ignore the storm around him and assume he's above it all.
You ignored me simply for pointing out that there's no such thing as an "ace of queens" and then pointing out your hypocrisy for blaming that silly mistake of yours on being a woman while arguing against misogyny. Basically all you've shown me in this thread is that you know a lot of big words but still run and hide behind the ignore button when a StateCollegeKen like myself has the nerve to point out when you're wrong.
share[deleted]
I stand corrected, I wrongly assumed I was blocked, my apologies. Happy Thanksgiving to you as well.
shareLiberals don't seem to care about the extra money being spent just to keep a woman safe from them.
share