Reporter gets kicked out the White House.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiNYK0CexJI
Apparently the freedom of press no longer exists.
Why is it whenever Trump does something, the only defense is "well....the other guy did it"?
You can't go in front of a judge after murdering 5 people and say "well, other people have been murdering for years so why can't i?"
Because people like to conveniently forget the past. Anti-Trumpers act like Trump is first President in history to do or say anything. Obama had a reported kicked out of a briefing and all the reporters cheered, Trump had a reporter kicked out of a briefing and all the reporters protested. You don't have to be a genius to see whats going on here. Example below:
Freedom of Press??
posted 17 hours ago by wheelin176 (1048)
16 replies | jump to latest
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-bans-cnn-reporter-rose-garden-event-after-she-n894686
Dictators do this.
If Trump is a dictator for doing this then that would also make Obama a dictator right? You can't have it both ways. I just find it interesting that people seem to forget the past.
You even mention the difference between the two instances and still don't see difference. Brilliant.
The other reporters cheer when Obama did it because it was probably some obnoxious prick from some rebel type media and deserved to be booted.
The other reporters protested because it was legitimate questioning and drumpf the giant manbaby threw a tantrum.
I am still confused on the differences so I will type it out so I will better understand.
Reporter A got kicked out of a briefing that was no questions asked by Obama was good.
Reported B got kicked out of a briefing that was no questions asked by Trump was bad.
So basically Reporter A got kicked out because he had no right to ask questions during a briefing that was no questions asked because he was an obnoxious tool. But Reporter B had every right to ask questions during a briefing that was no questions asked because she was a good person.
[deleted]
I was thinking about what you said and here is another example.
Person A murders 5 people and is not arrested or prosecuted.
Person B murders 5 people, Person B is arrested and proven guilty by a jury and then is sent to death row.
How can you have 2 results for the same event? It kind of reminds me of Schrodinger's cat.
Person A murders 5 people and is not arrested or prosecuted.If Person A was a Rogue or even Not Rogue Police officer would that work?
Person B murders 5 people, Person B is arrested and proven guilty by a jury and then is sent to death row.
If Person A was a Military personnel following orders would that work?
If Person A was wrongly convicted by tainted evidence with that suffice?
Sometimes Law Enforcement and the Judicial system gets it wrong. share
It was meant as an analogy and not to be taking as fact. I am just trying to figure out how one event can have 2 possible outcomes like Schrodinger's cat.
shareIn your own analogy you have two different people giving rise to how the same one event can have at least 2 possible and 2 different outcomes. Person A and Person B could have differences that determine and or even pre-determine the outcomes. Trying to dissect theorems and postulates from Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics is an exercise in non-deterministic uncertainty on every day objects, Micro versus Macro.
Fact based analogies and hypotheticals work easier on every day objects than open ended hypotheticals and or non-deterministic analogies.
Hypothetically speaking that is.
Carry on. I'll butt-out-ski.
Quantum mechanics (QM; also known as quantum physics, quantum theory, the wave mechanical model, or matrix mechanics), including quantum field theory, is a fundamental theory in physics which describes nature at the smallest scales of energy levels of atoms and subatomic particles.[2]
Classical physics (the physics existing before quantum mechanics) is a set of fundamental theories which describes nature at ordinary (macroscopic) scale. Most theories in classical physics can be derived from quantum mechanics as an approximation valid at large (macroscopic) scale.[3] Quantum mechanics differs from classical physics in that energy, momentum, angular momentum and other quantities of a system are restricted to discrete values (quantization); objects have characteristics of both particles and waves (wave-particle duality); and there are limits to the precision with which quantities can be measured (uncertainty principle).[note 1]
Quantum mechanics gradually arose from theories to explain observations which could not be reconciled with classical physics, such as Max Planck's solution in 1900 to the black-body radiation problem, and from the correspondence between energy and frequency in Albert Einstein's 1905 paper which explained the photoelectric effect. Early quantum theory was profoundly re-conceived in the mid-1920s by Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born and others. The modern theory is formulated in various specially developed mathematical formalisms. In one of them, a mathematical function, the wave function, provides information about the probability amplitude of position, momentum, and other physical properties of a particle.
Important applications of quantum theory[5] include quantum chemistry, quantum optics, quantum computing, superconducting magnets, light-emitting diodes, and the laser, the transistor and semiconductors such as the microprocessor, medical and research imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging and electron microscopy. Explanations for many biological and physical phenomena are rooted in the nature of the chemical bond, most notably the macro-molecule DNA.[6]
Scientific inquiry into the wave nature of light began in the 17th and 18th centuries, when scientists such as Robert Hooke, Christiaan Huygens and Leonhard Euler proposed a wave theory of light based on experimental observations.[7] In 1803, Thomas Young, an English polymath, performed the famous double-slit experiment that he later described in a paper titled On the nature of light and colours. This experiment played a major role in the general acceptance of the wave theory of light.
In 1838, Michael Faraday discovered cathode rays. These studies were followed by the 1859 statement of the black-body radiation problem by Gustav Kirchhoff, the 1877 suggestion by Ludwig Boltzmann that the energy states of a physical system can be discrete, and the 1900 quantum hypothesis of Max Planck.[8] Planck's hypothesis that energy is radiated and absorbed in discrete "quanta" (or energy packets) precisely matched the observed patterns of black-body radiation.
Because it shows that the left has selective moral outrage and are blatantly dishonest, they compare Trump to Hitler for doing things that Obama and every other president have done.
shareOr for throwing kids in cages and calling neo-nazis "very fine people".....you know, those things.
shareI agree, Obama shouldn't be doing those kind of things, its morally wrong.
sharelink to the news source where he called nazis "Very fine people".
shareHe said that there were fine people in the crowd (referring to the people who weren't Nazis). You are being dishonest.
shareLambo is a professional troller so I wouldn't put too much stock in what he says.
shareNo, the said there were "very fine people on both sides". The video of his actual words coming out of his actual mouth (no spin or dissection or interpretation needed) is out there. Anyone with access to that highly elite site, google.com, can see it.
shareAnd some people on the side you were referring to were not Neo Nazis. You know Anti Fa was on the other side, do the people who weren’t Anti Fa deserve to be lumped together with them?
You are beyond dishonest
Only one side murdered someone, though.
shareSince you said one thing and then pivoted when called out on it....who's the dishonest one again?
Also, as reprehensible as ANTIFA is.....Nazis, man. He gave a pass to Nazis.
Be an adult and admit that's a huge screw up.
He didn’t give a pass to nazis he said over and over again that he didn’t condone their behavior. He denounced them repeatedly. You seem to want to lump anyone who was there and wasn’t on the side you support in with the Nazis (and these people didn’t kill anyone) which is blatantly dishonest. There were fine people on both sides there were morally reprehensibe people on both sides. President Trump NEVER said the Nazis were fine people he wasn’t referring to them and I think you know that. I can recognize that there were people on the other side who wanted nothing to do with AntiFa but I at least have the maturity to not lump them together with that hate group. Seriously dude lay off the fake news and start acting like an adult
shareIt's VERY simple. If I show up to a rally and I see guys chanting Nazi slogans and carrying torches, I walk away. Because if you're not a Nazi and you stand with Nazis....you just became a Nazi.
Nazis are BAD.
We had a war about it.
It's just THAT simple.
There are few things more cut and dry.
So then they should have allowed the Nazis to bully them away? Why didn't the other side leave when AntiFa showed up? Make no mistake AntiFa is just as extreme as the Nazis are along with BLM.
Your argument that they support Nazism because they didn't immediately abandon their cause is nonsense, and no things aren't always as "cut and dry" as you would make them out to be.
No, my argument (is evident, but nice try at the pivot) is that the President of the United States should not have even given the least bit of credit to a side populated overwhelmingly by Neo-Nazis.
Which, by the way, makes him a supporter of them.
Nazis = Bad. 100% of the time.
And you saying ANTIFA is as extreme as Nazis? Shows more about your Alex Jones fed viewpoint than anything else.
Later, brownshirt.
He didn't give credit to the Neo-Nazis, he made a distinction between the sincere people on both sides and the radicals on both sides. I showed you a video where he said over and over again that he denounced the Neo-Nazis how does that make him a supporter?
And yes AntiFa and BLM are the leftist equivalent of the Neo-Nazis. And if you care again Barack Obama was a supporter of the BLM terrorists, even compared them with abolitionists.
By the way in case you care:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lZXOIb2o9o