If every liberal that expressed outrage over illegal immigration policy...
... was required by law to allow them to stay in their home with them if the illegals choose to, how many would still be vocal about it?
sharePeople would never be required by law to house immigrants.
shareIn Sweden people are forced to vacate if they cannot afford to house Somalian refugees.
In America, Holllywood already harbor illegals as servants.
At least we have space to house people.
shareWhere do you come up with these BS myths you're constantly peddling? There is no law in Sweden that forces anyone to house anyone, Somali or otherwise.
There was a rumor fueled by a 1992 commission that recommended the government should have the option to seize summer homes from the Swedish people in a time of crisis.
It was never made into law.
In 2015 a Swedish columnist urged the public to "make way" and "hand over the keys to their apartments to those in greater need."
That was her opinion, not the law. Do yourself the favor of fact checking your outlandish claims more often. A general rule, if it sounds like bullshit, it probably is.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6550/sweden-islam-multiculturalism
It's a hypothetical question. What's your answer?
shareLuv your "handle" Burk48917-space-(1086).
Do you have many on-line aliases? A bunch of bogus accounts? Russian maybe?
Or just someone paid to stir the pot, throw ignorant comments out to see how many ignorant people support them?
You answer my question honestly, and I'll answer in kind. I'm not afraid to be honest, evidently you are.
shareNow that I have read this thread thoroughly, I see others have addressed the same issues I have with your OP.
It's an absurd, hypothetical question.
What if everyone who bitched about taxes - quit paying taxes? Et cetela, et cetela.
I'll paste this here in case you missed this reply to someone else.
...that's why I clarified it was hypothetical. It strongly shows my point that the vocal left can't be honest that the problem is extremely complicated when it comes to letting people in with no jobs, income, no knowledge of their background, no homes,etc.Not one person has actually answered this question. Obviously nobody should be forced to do something that affects their lives directly in a negative way,or forced in a situation because the government strong armed us. That line of thinking directly parallels forcing Americans to pay taxes for services to people who DON'T pay taxes, look the other way when they take our jobs, accept that they commit horrible crimes after they've been deported multiple times, or accept illegals who send money back to there families from illegal jobs instead of spending it in our economy. The left thinks we should be forced to accept these things, and it's just as rediculous as forcing people to allow strangers in their homes. I'm glad you agree.
I would not be ok with being forced to house anyone. The third amendment addressed this partially. I don’t think anyone would like this liberal or conservative.
shareI agree,and that's why I clarified it was hypothetical. It strongly shows my point that the vocal left can't be honest that the problem is extremely complicated when it comes to letting people in with no jobs, income, no knowledge of their background, no homes,etc.Not one person has actually answered this question. Obviously nobody should be forced to do something that affects their lives directly in a negative way,or forced in a situation because the government strong armed us. That line of thinking directly parallels forcing Americans to pay taxes for services to people who DON'T pay taxes, look the other way when they take our jobs, accept that they commit horrible crimes after they've been deported multiple times, or accept illegals who send money back to there families from illegal jobs instead of spending it in our economy. The left thinks we should be forced to accept these things, and it's just as rediculous as forcing people to allow strangers in their homes. I'm glad you agree.
shareRespectfully, you are provoking a NIMBY argument that makes compassionate people look like hypocrites.
No one doesn't want people - especially themselves - to be successful. Very few people want their taxes raised.
Unfettered Capaitalism (i.e., No Regulation) has led to to greedy merchants going where they can get cheap labor and the American workforce be damned. That's Reagun's free market/no regulation/union busting coming to fruition.
Tear Down This Wall. Build Up This Wall. Which is it?
And yes, the problem is extremely complicated, and I compliment you for acknowledging that.
btw, I think it's a gross misstatement that We are looking the other way about taking jobs away and horrible crimes. I'm sure the % of illegals committing crimes is dwarfed by our own villains, and the great % of illegals are just striving to get a better life.
If "illegals" choose to live frugally, and greedy Repubs like Trump choose to employ them on the cheap, they have the right to send their $$ to their families.
I personally don't want to solve Society's Problems by personally housing illegal or homeless people.
That doesn't mean I don't care and I don't want resources wisely used to make this World A Better Place.
Wow this post is a breathe of sane air. Agree 100% and love the Regan quote highlighting how bipolar the republicants are. Regan is their god (until drumpf became their supreme leader) and that's an iconic line.
To me, perhaps the issue of becoming a legal citizen needs to be more accessible, affordable and streamlined,but as with many aspects of our government it is inefficient, financially wasteful and corrupt. This includes areas like the IRS, all levels of law enforcement and areas of the military, and for most small town governments. We'd all like to ignore the laws, regulations and requirements that are unjust, misguided or blatently corrupt. The answer is to change what isn't working,not ignore it or disregard it. And certainly it shouldn't be expected to suffer no consequences for choosing to ignore laws. I'd be arrested as quick as anyone if I decided not to file my income tax return because I feel it is unjust. We need to change the system, not just pick and choose which areas of it we decide to respect.
share