Happy there's SO MUCH EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION ALREADY in spite of Trump's constant claims otherwise...

Lol!

Do you think the T-rump supporters here understand one word of that article?

Nope.

It’s an excellent article. We went ahead and removed speculation and information from “unnamed sources” and listed the pure facts attributed collusion:

1st: Donald J Trump ran for president.

2nd: He had a campaign team.

And:































[spoiler]There was no collusion.[/spoiler]

An outstanding example of how the demokkkrat news media consists of nothing more than speculation based on unnamed sources and regurgitating each other’s hypothesis. Cut and paste more please.

#ThinkForYourselves
#StillNoDemokkkratPlatform
#HateIsNotAPlatform

All excellent points, and there is NO DOUBT that Nunes hands are dirty and he's been doing everything in his power to obstruct the investigation like his own career depends on it.

I think his behavior lays in part in his participation on the Trump transition team, a period in which Mike Flynn is known to have been actively negotiating lifting sanctions with Russia ambassador Kislyak. According to multiple sourced reporting at the time, Flynn was quite open about his active negotiations with everyone else on the transition team. Perhaps Nunes played a part in those machinations, because he's certainly been acting exactly as if he himself were compromised and has been doing everything in his power to actively interfere with Mueller's investigation by issuing subpoenas to DoJ and shutting down the House investigation, refusing to call key witnesses like Flynn to the committee who could point the finger right at Nunes.

I find it particularly hilarious any Trump supporter that tries to maintain the fiction of "no evidence of collusion" when the circumstantial evidence we know about so far is just overwhelming. People are convicted in courts and serve substantial prison terms all the time based on purely circumstantial evidence alone far less damning than the evidence we've seen that Trump colluded.

But like you pointed out, all that needs to be confirmed for there to have been collusion is for Trump Jr to have informed his dad ahead of time about that meeting.

So it's no wonder they were dead set against issuing subpoenas for the phone records of whose blocked number he called. When asked behind closed doors in congressional hearings, he refused to answer the question.

Hint: You have to read the article to know about what evidence I'm even referring to.

Regardless, this is over a month old and there's even more evidence today than back then.

So get to it! You've got a lot of catching up to do boy. Heeyah.

That, and also the fact that the strongest evidence of wrongdoing to this point isn't primarily about any collusion (although it's growing) by Trump and his stooges, it's the fact that most of them seem to have obstructed justice towards the investigation about it. They only compounded their trouble by trying to nip something in the bud, basically putting out a fire with gasoline.

Couldn't agree more.

Who would bother risking criminal obstruction of an investigation into himself if he didn't commit the underlying crime? We've witnessed firsthand the constant attacks and attempts to derail an investigation that prosecutors would call "consciousness of guilt".

He acts exactly like a desperate guilty man would act trying to cover up his own crimes. That's really the most obvious evidence of all.

Every tyrant in history has used that rationale to justify investigating and locking up their opponents. The desire to have one's rights protected does not constitute evidence of guilt. It doesn't even constitute circumstantial evidence of guilt. The entire idea is antithetical to democracy and the rule of law.