Can politics be derived?

We think Donald Trump colluded and we want to punish him for it. We know Hillary collided but we don’t care. Therefore we don’t actually care if Trump colluded or not. We just want to punish him regardless and colluding is as good a pretext as any. Most likely there is no collusion or else we would have found it since we are looking so hard.

This is the kind of Marxian analysis used to derive privlidge which I don’t agree with. However I think everything above happens to be true. I also think collusion was an insurance policy. In case Trump won, it was planned to compromise him and keep the wars going. It is absurd to me that anyone would defend the idea that peace is a Russian conspiracy. On what planet?