MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > The DNC Sues Trump Campaign, Watergate-S...

The DNC Sues Trump Campaign, Watergate-Style

posted 7 years ago by dlancer (2036)
28 replies | jump to latest

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trump-democrats-lawsuit-sue-russia-wikileaks-republicans-dnc-watergate-a8315111.html

I don't agree with the shot at Wikileaks since they merely report whatever they get their hands on, but Wikileaks will never be a friend to either establishment so... yeah.

The bigger point will be connecting someone from Trump's camp (Stone) to Guccifer 2.0 (GRU).

With Mueller putting the screws to Trump's cohorts, the DNC may recognize a possible 'Saturday Night Massacre' issued by Trump in the near future. Obviously, the DNC will want their lawsuit filed before then.

[–] Gd5150 (11965) 7 years ago

What a great way to illustrate the utter worthlessness of the demokkkrat party.

This is going to completely backfire on them. They have now opened discovery, meaning interviews and more investigations into the nonexistent Russian collusion fantasy.

Here’s the best part. Discovery is a 2 way street. Meaning, Hilary, Obama, Christopher Steele (the person the demokkkrats paid to write the dossier used to secure the FISA warrant that allowed Obama/Hilary to illegally spy on the Trump campaign), all involved with Hilary’s illegal email server, will now be open to investigation.

And not only by Trump and his lawyers. But Wikileaks lawyers. And by...Ready? by Putin and his lawyers. Haha!!! The DNC is so stupid and worthless this is an all time classic.

Still no evidence of collusion.
Still no evidence of a platform.

This is your demokkkrat party: the party of hate and fail.

#HateDoesNotGenerate

[–] [email protected] (690) 7 years ago

#HateDoesNotGenerate., but Gd5150 (231) generates a lot of hate.
And your MC handle sounds like a randomly generated bot-name.
Bet you have A LOT of accounts, comrade productive citizen.

[–] Culburn (3638) 7 years ago

(The Russian Bot assertion.) Last bastion for the thoroughly vanquished.

[–] Gd5150 (11965) 7 years ago

But it is great for laughs. Poor little hate filled demokkkrat lemmings.

#HateDoesNotCreate

[–] [email protected] (690) 7 years ago

Hahaha .. just keep it up, we all need to laugh at your ugly, nasty posts.
Your hate will sustain you, along with your kkk fetish. Is this one of your tattoos?
And lemmings? You are an expert on that one. That's your whole life experience.
Continue, Comrade. Otlichno srabotano !

[–] filmtenk (765) 7 years ago

#hatedoesnotgenerate.

The rallying cry of the guy who killed Heather Heyer in Charlottesville.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

And the right wing shooter at The Waffle House.

[–] Keelai (36128) 7 years ago

Wikileaks may have started off as a way to report information, but at some point Assange became Putin/Russia's stooge. I guess everyone does have a price.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

Wikileaks is anti-establishment. They kinda have to be because it's the establishment that are constantly trying to end them. The GOP may have gotten a temporary bump from it, but they know it's only a matter of time until Wikileaks airs their dirty laundry just like what happened with Bush.

That's not to say Wikileaks is not guilty of misinformation. I believe they are. They said they didn't get the leaks from Russia. Maybe it was because Guccifer 2.0 was believed to be Romanian back then. It wasn't until more recently that he messed up by failing to turn on his VPN which pinged him in Moscow. Whoops.

Then there's the chance Wikileaks got it from Roger Stone (who got it from Guccifer), which is the last thing Trump would want because that would instantly doom his presidency. And goddamn, do I hope it's true, because I hate Roger Stone with a passion.

[–] Keelai (36128) 7 years ago

"They said they didn't get the leaks from Russia."
Why do you believe them?

"...Guccifer 2.0..."
I think it's obvious the hackers are Russians.

The only thing that's unclear is which past criminal activity will doom Trump's presidency.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

Believe is a strong word. I never claimed to believe what Assange said was fact, but I can give him the benefit of the doubt considering two things: Guccifer 2.0 was considered to be a Romanian by our own intel back then when he made that claim. And there's also the chance Wikileaks got them from a middle man who got them from Guccifer.

Assange was undoubtedly on Trump's side, but I don't blame him since Hillary basically threatened to kill the guy. Also, Assange understood the disarray that Trump could cause for the republican establishment, giving progressives a boost in future elections.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

What DNC chairman Lawrence O'Brien said in 1972, is as strong a declaration today as it was back then:

“This is not partisan, it’s patriotic … It is our obligation to the American people.”

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

I believe it is even more patriotic today. We're seeing a wave of talking heads trying to give Russia a pass by using the fact that the US engages in our own cyber espionage. That should never be a talking point. America should always come first.

[–] Culburn (3638) 7 years ago

But, it's a fact. We take umbrage when somebody does it to us, and yet we practice the same damn strategies on others and believe, with a straight that it's acceptable.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

We do it to help ourselves. Other countries do it to help themselves. We try to prevent it to help ourselves. Other countries try to prevent it to help themselves. After those preventative measures failed, we now have a wave of talking heads suggesting we leave it alone instead of focusing on preventing it... because preventing it requires investigation into someone they like. Tsk. Tsk.

[–] Culburn (3638) 7 years ago

It's despicable no matter who does it. All it's ever wrought is resentment, anger & vengeance.

Act like somebody!

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

You call it despicable, yet the free market calls it capitalism.

[–] Culburn (3638) 7 years ago

Only if Trump had lost.

[–] ThreeTenToYuma (922) 7 years ago

I don't remember Hillary or the DNC complaining after Trump's 1995 tax returns were illegally leaked to the NY Times a month before the election. Hypocritical scumbags.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

They didn’t want to get his daughter Tiffany into trouble for leaking them. I don’t blame them, for it would have been disastrous to know the candidates red-headed stepchild was the one who leaked them.

[–] ThreeTenToYuma (922) 7 years ago

You are one sick SOB.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

This really is Trump's biggest problem. He gets himself in sticky financial situations which many billionaires do, but he's so surrounded by incompetence that he can't get away with it like the rest.

[–] ThreeTenToYuma (922) 7 years ago

Blah blah blah. Trump is still the President, and will be so for the foreseeable future.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

Yes, we know. No matter what argument you put forward, as soon as someone points out its flaws, it always devolves to "Trump is president."

It used to be said by your side that Trump would be president for eight years, which is beyond the foreseeable future, but now it's just the foreseeable future. That bar just keeps on lowering.

[–] ThreeTenToYuma (922) 7 years ago

Your argument didn't address anything, actually. Someone sympathetic to the Clinton campaign leaked Trump's tax return. The Clinton campaign should be investigated for collusion. Whether or not Trump gets into "sticky financial situations" is irrelevant.

[–] dlancer (2036) 7 years ago

"Someone sympathetic to the Clinton campaign leaked Trump's tax return."

In that thread, you didn't provide a link claiming such a thing. So far it appears to be your imagination at work.

More importantly, "Trump won." All information that was revealed about him did not sway the election in Hillary's favor. She climbed in a hole, later wrote a book, and talked about being some kind of TV host.

Trump beat her so badly that it's now impossible for her to take any more damage. Sorry, that's just how it goes with people who lose and disappear. And when you try to connect this or that to her campaign after such a loss, you're just saying to everybody "hey don't look at Trump, instead watch me beat this dead horse with my baseball bat," again bringing more negative attention to Trump and doing absolutely nothing to Shillary.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

Next it will be “for this week”. T-rump will be president for this week.

[–] Thrillhouse (1509) 6 years ago

Any updates on this?