MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Fearful T-rump lawyers want to stop 'Sto...

Fearful T-rump lawyers want to stop 'Stormy' interview on 60 Minutes


In a move smacking of fear and desperation, T-rump's lawyers are working overtime today in trying to stop '60 Minutes' from airing a new interview with Stormy Daniels, rumored to be on tonight's broadcast. The interview was conducted this week with correspondent Anderson Cooper.

According to insiders at the White House, “We understand from well-placed sources they are preparing to file for a legal injunction to prevent it from airing.” Trump's attorney Michael Cohen did not comment on the report, and referred questions to other lawyers, who did not comment.

Daniels' lawyer Michael Avenatti has shared the news on his Twitter account, which has hadded thousands of followers over the past week.

CBS said the interview is scheduled to air, but wouldn't specify a date. On Friday evening, CNN's Anderson Cooper told viewers the interview would air tonight.

reply

If only dems could somehow get Trump under oath like repubs did to Billy boy in 98.

reply

Well Stormy wasn't on last night, but they did have Betsy DeVos on who was completely humiliated by Leslie Stahl. What a jackass she is - in charge of our public education.

reply

It would seem that most of the Stormy deniers have left the forum.

reply

You too can get a taste of Stormy as Trump did by just searching for her old porno vids of riding, sucking, rubbing, staring intently, smelling, and grabbing cock. No need for 60 minutes of her describing what's it like to fuck her. I guess the only tidbit she'll devolve is his penis size and flaps of lard.

reply

I'm more interested in her talking about the illegal campaign 'pay off' they gave her, not her sex life with T-rump. I'm sure Anderson will spare the viewers the gross details of T-rump's sexual activities and focus on why she was paid off and how.

reply

Smelling? That sure is specific. You've done your research.

reply

I watch a lot of porn ;)

reply