MovieChat Forums > Kristen Stewart Discussion > Reviews and other things regarding 'Spen...

Reviews and other things regarding 'Spencer'


OK, later today Spencer will have its world premiere at the Venice Film Festival, so we are sure to see many reviews of the film.

Before they are published, I thought it might be nice to start this thread by quoting a rather interesting article I just read at Indiewire, an article which was basically an interview with Spencer director Pablo Larrain regarding the making of the film. This post will be kinda long, so I will have to add to it via edits because of the character limit that MovieChat imposes.

From: https://www.indiewire.com/2021/09/spencer-pablo-larrain-interview-kristen-stewart-1234661544/

'Spencer": Pablo Larrain on Reinventing Princess Diana with an "Upside Down Fairy Tale"
Despite obvious comparisons to Jackie, Larrain's latest portrait of an iconic woman takes a radically different approach with star Kristen Stewart.
by Eric Kohn

The most recent season of The Crown tackled the Princess Diana saga with Emma Corrin in the central role, but it should come as no surprise that it's not the only recent effort to grapple with her legacy. In Spencer, Chilean director Pablo Larrain follows a transformative Kristen Stewart as the troubled princess on the weekend she decides to separate from Prince Charles. Yet Larrain's film adopts a radical new approach to the ubiquitous character by reinventing her story -- and giving her the last laugh, no matter what history books say.
------------
Yet Spencer avoids many familiar paths to Diana's legacy by taking serious liberties with her story and making no apologies for it. "We aren't trying to explain who she was or answer questions on the larger scale of her life," Larrain said in a phone interview from his native Santiago. "We're fictionalizing most of it based on what we think could have happened."
------------
Which is not to say that Spencer aims for any firm conclusions. Instead, like much of Larrain's work, the movie operates as an immersive and enigmatic character study built around the firece determination of a character fighting to transcend her claustrophobic surroundings. Set at a Christmas gathering of the Royals at their vacation home in Sandringham House in Norfolk circa 1991, Spencer presents an imaginative vision of Diana as her grip on reality grows murkier and her frustrations with Royal traditions threaten to crush her resolve. Larrain's approach blends Stewart's measured performance with the precision of Locke writer Steven Knight's screenplay and Jonny Greenwood's frantic score. The result is an ominos chamber piece on the power of maternal instincts and the process through which a beleaguered woman cuts her own path.

"She was a woman trapped in a very unusual context," Larrain said. "Even though she came from a very aristocratic environment and was close to the Royals, she became an icon of ordinary things." A far cry from the historical precision of The Crown, Larrain's approach embraces the opportunity to invent it's own version of the character and the unknown circumstances that unfolded over the course of that fateful weekend. While keeping her distance from Prince Charles (Jack Farthing), the Diana of Spencer oscillates from maintaining a protective demeanor over her two kids (Jack Nielen and Freddie Spry) and wrestling with unnerving physical expectations imposed on her by ubiquitous rituals.

At times, tension yields shocking flashes of body horror, such as when Diana imagines herself consuming the weighted pearl necklace she's forced to wear at the dinner table, before attempting to puke it back up. Elsewhere, her mounting rebellion yields flashes of dark comedy ("I'm going to masturbate now," she tells one doting servant, just to scare her off). As she begins to imagine the figure of Anne Boylen (Amy Manson) creeping through the shadows, Stewart's Diana begins to comprehend the malleable nature of her surroundings and bend them to her will.
------------
Larrain said he and Knight "came up with the idea to create a sort of jailbreak movie and an upside-down fairy tale. It's how she's connecting with herself, her youth, her past, and building her identity. The symbol of that is recovering her last name. It's very simple but on a human level very complex."

That approach gave them liberty to discard any allegiance to historical accuracy. The movie opens with a credit announcing it as a "fable from true tragedy" and runs wild from there.


There's a lot more to this article which, as I previously said, is quite interesting. I shall add one thing more on the next post.

reply

I thought I would be able to add the following simply by editing the opening post to this thread, but unfortuantely, the character limit made it impossible for me to do so.

Anyway, what I wanted to add was the reason why Pablo Larrain cast Kristen to play Princess Diana in Spencer ...

However, the project really took off when Larrain secured interest from Stewart, whom the director had been tracking ever since he saw her eerie turn in Olivier Assayas' Personal Shopper, which deals with subjective perspective in similar ways. "There were many things she delivered that words cannot describe," Larrain said. "That's where Cinema starts to operate."
------------
Larrain produced most of the set photos himself, and said that there was one key moment after Stewart finished makeup and hair where he felt that she had fully become the character. "Once she was confident with the accent and all the sort of practical verbal issues, she became a poetic combination of herself and Diana," he said. "I don't know what most people see in Kristen, but I see someone who was able to find the physicality and style of the great actresses of '50s and '60s. We felt like we were looking at an old-school type of performance in the best possible way. We just couldn't stop admiring what she was doing."

Wow, words like that make me want to see this film even more.

Finally, let me add that Larrain's comment regarding Kristen's "physicality and style" is exactly why I thought that her performance as Georgia in The Cake Eaters was her best one ever.
It will be interesting to see whether her performance in Spencer tops that.

reply

Stewart is a great actress.

reply

Wow, words like that make me want to see this film even more.

Agreed! This reviewer has some amazing comments. Good to see especially given the topic and how widely admired and well liked a person that Princess Di was.

Finally, let me add that Larrain's comment regarding Kristen's "physicality and style" is exactly why I thought that her performance as Georgia in The Cake Eaters was her best one ever.
It will be interesting to see whether her performance in Spencer tops that.


The Cake Eaters was a great performance, and Kristen was still young, mid teens.

reply

Spencer currently has an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes with 25 reviews.

One of my favorite reviews so far has come from Variety's chief film critic Owen Gleiberman:

‘Spencer’ Review: Kristen Stewart Transforms in Pablo Larraín’s Masterly Princess Diana Movie https://variety.com/2021/film/reviews/spencer-review-kristen-stewart-1235055104/

Here are some of my fave excerpts from his review:

And here’s the beauty part: Right off, we feel as if we’re seeing…Diana. The real thing. Kristen Stewart doesn’t just do an impersonation (though on the level of impersonation she’s superb). She transforms; she changes her aspect, her rhythm, her karma.

Mostly, though, what we see in Stewart’s Diana is a woman of homegrown elegance, with a luminosity that pours out of her, except that part of her is now driven to crush that radiance, because her life has become a wreck.

I thought “Jackie” was a knockout, and “Spencer,” which also finds its heroine living through a fateful moment of truth and transition, is every bit as good; it may be even better.

Skewing her arms up in the air, Diana demands that her sons stop hunting. And Stewart makes that the most moving moment I’ve seen in any film this year. Diana isn’t speaking as a royal. She’s speaking as a mother — as the woman she will now be.




reply

Spencer currently has an 81% rating on Rotten Tomatoes with 21 reviews.

This is a great rating, especially as RT responders can be tough judges. That's also a very positive review by Variety's Owen Gleiberman.

reply

Spencer's RT rating has been bumped up to a highly respectable 89% with 36 total reviews. Hopefully the positive reviews keep trickling in.

The review I'm most concerned with at the moment is the one written by Stephanie Zacharek, who seems to admire Kristen's acting and usually speaks highly of her performances which are deserving of praise. However, in Spencer, although Zacharek doesn't place the blame squarely on Kristen's shoulders--she did say Kristen "gave it her all"--the title, "Kristen Stewart and Pablo Larraín Do Princess Diana Wrong in Spencer", speaks volumes as far as Kristen not living up to Zacharek's expectations of her becoming Princess Diana.

reply

Interesting, and too bad so we'll see how other reviews go and from audiences. I'm gratified that RT has such a good rating as they can be tough with reviews.

reply

Spencer just reached the 91% threshold on Rotten Tomatoes with 43 reviews so far.

reply

Wow, that's an excellent review on RT, as they can be tough on movies and shows. It's early yet and so far few reviews but still a good start.

reply

Another one of my fave reviews was submitted by Pete Hammond of Deadline who showered Kristen and the film with high praise:

‘Spencer’ Venice Film Festival Review: Kristen Stewart Finds The Private Diana In Pablo Larrain’s Superb Royal Breakup Drama https://deadline.com/2021/09/spencer-venice-film-festival-review-kristen-stewart-finds-the-private-diana-in-pablo-larrains-superb-royal-breakup-drama-1234825978/

Larrain tackled Jackie Kennedy also through his own unique lens in Jackie which earned Natalie Portman an Oscar nomination, but Spencer is something else indeed, almost playing out in a conventional dramatic fashion, a more accessible approach in some ways, but also more ambitious as it is squarely from the point of view of its title character, purposely called Spencer to assure us that the person who once was, is well on the way to finding that very lost spirit again before it is too late.

I can’t say enough about Stewart’s performance, steering from an impression of an impossibly well-chronicled figure to beautifully achieving the essence of who she was. It is a bracing, bitter, moving, and altogether stunning turn, taking Diana down roads we have not seen played out quite like in this mesmerizing portrayal.

There has been an endless examination and fascination towards Diana. Lorrain and Stewart however have excavated her soul, and, in the end, presented what we should most want to remember.

reply

I'm glad to see this very positive review of Kristen and also of the movie. Too often Kristen gets a good review but the movie and storyline don't measure up, or are mediocre or disappointing.

reply

David Rooney, another chief film critic at a major trade publication, The Hollywood Reporter, also had flattering things to say about Kristen's performance:

Kristen Stewart in Princess Diana Biopic ‘Spencer’: Film Review | Venice 2021

Billed as “a fable from a true tragedy,” this is a speculative study of a woman in extremis, played by an incandescent Kristen Stewart.

As such, it rests on Stewart’s shoulders and she commits to the film’s slightly bonkers excesses as much as to its moments of delicate illumination. The hair and makeup team has done a remarkable job at altering her appearance to fit the subject, even if this is a film in which the essence of the characters is given more weight than the actors’ resemblance to them. But Stewart’s finely detailed work on the accent and mannerisms is impeccable. The camera adores her, and she has seldom been more magnetic, or more heartbreakingly fragile.

reply