MovieChat Forums > Kristen Stewart Discussion > Reviews for 'Charlie's Angels'

Reviews for 'Charlie's Angels'


Just read two reviews for Charlie's Angel's, and I am pleased to say that both were quite positive.

The first is from Owen Gleiberman in Variety ...
https://variety.com/2019/film/reviews/charlies-angels-review-kristen-stewart-elizabeth-banks-1203401197/

It's kind of a lengthy review, but here's one section I really liked ...

Kristen Stewart stepped off the merry-go-round of mainstream blockbusters after the last 'Twilight' film, though in the seven years since her star has only risen. Or maybe it's just that now that she's 29, it glitters all the more intensely. As Sabina, Stewart exudes a flashing-eyed magnetism that brushes her moodier mannerisms aside, yet she hasn't let go of the thing they express -- her need to survey every situation. In 'Charlie's Angels,' she's a spy who's spying on everyone in the room, even her comrades. Ella Balinska infuses Jane with a high command, though it's not as if she's all imperious poses. It's part of the film's brashness that she can take a moment, in the middle of a heist, to pour condiments on the sandwich of an adorable-hunk lab assistant (Noah Centineo) and then take a flirtatious bite. And Naomi Scott, as Elena, has a playful sensual curiosity that makes you think of Sarah Michelle Gellar. The movie works because these three ooze personality without resorting to quirks.

It also works because Elizabeth Banks, having graduated from the 'Pitch Perfect' series, proves herself to be a filmmaker with extreme flair. The plot of 'Charlie's Angels' turns on a series of reversals and double-crosses that Banks juggles with propulsive agility.


The second review is from David Ehrlich of Indiewire, who gives the film a solid B.
https://www.indiewire.com/2019/11/charlies-angels-review-kristen-stewart-2019-1202188932/

The thing that struck my eye was the headline and sub-headline ...
"'Charlie's Angels' Review: A Hilarious Kristen Stewart Anchors Elizabeth Banks' Kick-Ass Reboot
Say hello to Kristen Stewart, comedy icon."

Ditto for the following ...
"Okay, Banks does bust out one gambit that nobody saw coming: Kristen Stewart as a killer comic lead."

That definitely was a most pleasant surprise.

reply

"As it turns out, this is not your mother’s — or even your big sister’s — “Charlie’s Angels.” It’s an undercover fantasy about agents who take their whoop-ass seriously. The new movie crossbreeds the relentlessness of a “Bourne” thriller with the tossed-off trickiness of a “Mission: Impossible” caper, all of it written and directed, by Elizabeth Banks, as if she’d been making cheeky renegade action films all her life."

I like this part, that the movie is more serious, not a light hearted kind of action film. I like the praise of Kristen in a semi-comedic role, looking forward to that too.

"The movie works because these three ooze personality without resorting to quirks."
Nice, this bodes well also.

Good to see some good reviews. I was hoping they'd do this up well since given the material the writers and studio have a lot to work with to put out a good new film of The Angels.

reply

Here's another one Ron, this time from The Hollywood Reporter
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/charlies-angels-review-1254087

The prior versions of Charlie's Angels bear almost no resemblance to its latest iteration. While the basic premise is still the same -- three women work for an unknown multimillionaire boss named Charlie through his proxy (well, now it's actually proxies, all still named Bosley) -- this time around Banks basically keeps the facade while gutting the interior.

The result is a grand remodel that honors its precursors while elevating itself beyond them. Banks brings Charlie's Angels into the modern age with flair, all while unapologetically raising a feminist flag, championing female friendships and subtly making a point about the urgency of the ongoing climate crisis.


Once again, it's nice to see such a positive review for the film. Unfortunately however, it does not appear that Charlie's Angels will win the box office competition this weekend as it seems that Ford v. Ferrari is expected to be the number one draw. The ironic thing about that is that Sony moved CA from November 1st to November 15th because it did not want to go up against that new Terminator film, a film which ended up not doing too well at the box office. Oh well, such is life in the film business.

reply

I saw Charlie's Angels Friday afternoon, the day it came out. I added spoilers though I don't think I gave the plot away, mostly discussed the cast and the movie in general.

I must say that I really liked it, and felt it was a fun and well done reboot of the CA movie genre. The cast was very good, as the above review line says, "The movie works because these three ooze personality without resorting to quirks."

I liked Elizabeth Banks in it, giving it more of a flair. Glad she was one of the Bossley's. I'm a fan of Kristen but even so I really felt that her character was a huge part in carrying the film. I've rarely seen her in a role that allowed her to be so animated and entertaining. She had many comedic lines and one liners which added a lot to her character and as the film's comic relief. Naomi and Ella were also very fun and entertaining, just being their characters without the need for "quirks". The movie moves fast with little slowdowns, lots of fun action.

reply

I attended a noon show today (Saturday) and agree with all of the points that you mentioned Ron. While Charlie's Angels currently has a rotten rating of 59% (just a percentage point below a fresh rating) on the film aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, the "Verified Audience" score is a respectable 80%. Even more impressive is its B+ grade on Cinema Score. This may turn out to be a movie which gets mixed reviews by critics, yet well liked by moviegoers--so hopefully moviegoers give this film enough buzz and positive word of mouth to give CA some legs, as it did not do well as expected at the box office on Friday and Saturday. That being said, I thought I should add my two cent review:

While Charlie's Angels had its funny moments, thanks in large part to Kristen (e.g., the opening scene, which Kristen nailed, set the groundwork for what CA would ultimately be about), it played more like a spy thriller than an action-comedy, due to its ingenious espionage scenes, the underlying theme of elite power players weaponizing, of all things clean energy, edge-of-your-seat action sequences, double-crossings, and a bevy of plot twists which kept this film unpredictable. Of course Elizabeth Banks' feminist vision was spot on--if this wasn't the very definition of a girl power movie, then honestly I don't know what is. I mean, all the lead male characters, especially the misogynistic villains, either ended up dead or by the end of the film they were emasculated, walking around with their tails between their legs. Heck, even Charlie himself--or should I say, herself--is a woman. While the CA reboot payed homage to previous films in the franchise as well as to the original television series, Banks took female empowerment to another level. And this movie, despite its engaging storyline, wouldn't have been as enjoyable to watch if it wasn't for the noteworthy performances and chemistry exhibited by Kristen, Naomi Scott and Ella Balinska. This was the heart and soul of the movie--it was what gave me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside throughout the entire duration of the movie.

Getting back to Kristen's character Sabina, I now understand what director Banks and costar Scott meant when they remarked concerning how spontaneously hilarious Kristen was, as many of her comedic quips weren't even in the film script. And it wasn't just what Kristen said verbally, but what she did that made her funny. Take for example the crazy faces she made to a child sitting across from her while traveling on a boat, contorting her face almost beyond recognition. That, in my humble opinion is comedic talent on the level of say, Jim Carey. Thus the critics and moviegoers are probably surprised by Kristen's performance--although I knew she had it in her to pull off such a role after watching her absolutely own it during her two guest host appearances on Saturday Night Live. So judging by this, Kristen has the ability to act in such a way if the material calls for it and if the director cuts her loose and allows her to act in an impromptu and impulsive manner.

Lastly, the scene where Naomi Scott hacks into a Calisto device in order to weaponize it so it will emit EMP in order to override security and open a large steel door which is blocking an exit is eerily similar to a scene in the screenplay that I'm working on. So I guess it's back to the drawing board for me if I want to avoid being cliche.

reply

Update: 11/17/19: Charlie's Angels is currently rated "Fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlies_angels_2019

reply

Good to hear about the RT rating. And it also seems to be getting good audience scores on other venues. I hope it does well as I really think they did a good job with this and it deserves some good recognition.

reply

The thing that struck my eye was the headline and sub-headline ...
"'Charlie's Angels' Review: A Hilarious Kristen Stewart Anchors Elizabeth Banks' Kick-Ass Reboot
Say hello to Kristen Stewart, comedy icon."

Ditto for the following ...
"Okay, Banks does bust out one gambit that nobody saw coming: Kristen Stewart as a killer comic lead."

That definitely was a most pleasant surprise.


Makes one wonder why more clips of Kristen "as a killer comic lead" weren't included in the film trailers. I'm guessing moviegoers too will be pleasantly surprised.

But then again, Kristen absolutely nailed it in her recent guest host appearance on SNL, so as fans of Kristen we knew she had it in her.

reply