Mark Ruffalo vs Edward Norton as the Hulk?
Discuss.
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareThis message has been deleted by an administrator
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareMark.
shareAgreed Mark.
shareTheir respective Hulks are only as good as their Bruce Banners, and in this respect, Ruffalo brought a humanity with a touch of melancholy to Banner that Norton lacked. There's also a sense of danger in Ruffalo as Banner, and he expresses this better than Norton did. Also, Ruffalo plays th role with intelligence. As did Norton, but I feel as though Ruffalo enjoyed the role more, and through that, the traits we know are present in this character are obvious, but there's also more than the Hulk beneath the surface. Eric Bana also offered this in his performance, although with more intensity.
NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!
^This.
His Bruce Banner is quite reminiscent of Bill Bixby's take. I think Ruffalo is the best Banner of them all and I loved his Hulk of course.
This life is a preparation for heaven, hell....or both.
Mark for the simple fact that he's not a complete douche and nightmare to work with like Norton is.
share