Todd Solondz is great. The only reason i didn't include him is because i wouldn't really consider him quite "new" enough (i was thinking post-1996). Alexander Payne, on the other hand, i just don't see whats so great about him. Election was a decent flick, but nothing terribly special in my opinion. About Schmitt was the textbook definition of unremarkable, and i didn't even bother with the middle-aged yuppie posturing of Sideways (who wants to see a movie about schlubby middle-aged guys drinking wine? Film critics, that's who). Overall Payne is just much too middle-of-the-road faux-indie for my taste. Totally competanant, but dull.
If we're doing as far back as the entire 90s than i'd add Larry Clark, Gregg Araki, Paul Thomas Anderson, Michael Haneke, Wes Anderson, Lars Von Trier (true, he started in the 80s but he gained prominence in the 90s), Leos Carax (again, started in the 80s, but with only four films to his credit i think it's still reasonable to consider him a relatively newer filmmaker), Takeshi Kitano, Michael Winterbottom, Mike Figgis (had some duds, but with Leaving Las Vegas and The Loss of Sexual Innocence to his name i can afford to cut him some slack), Richard Linklater, Gus Van Sant (again, started in the 80s, but mostly 90s), and Danny Boyle.
Todd Haynes started out all right with Poison and Safe, especially Poison, but since then he's done Velvet Goldmine, a total atrocity of a film, and Far From Heaven, an overblown, overrated, over-indulgant spectacle. So overall i can't really cut the guy much slack.
http://www.ymdb.com/user_top20_view.asp?usersid=11491
reply
share