MovieChat Forums > Laurence Fox Discussion > The vile female "journalist" that Fox ri...

The vile female "journalist" that Fox ridiculed has used the same "wouldn't shag" jibe that he did!!!


Eva whatever her name is, has ridiculed multiple men on Twitter, telling them she wouldn't "shag" them. She has also scoffed at the male suicide rate, says men should feel "terror" in their interactions with women, and outright called men a "virus": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PWVrH4icag

Fox says he would never want to "shag" Eva. The crazed man-hater then pretends to be hurt by a jibe that she herself has used on multiple occasions, and of course, the lefty loons and white knight simps come running to her defence. Pathetic!

So... are women just as strong and resilient as men, or are they little helpless damsels in distress? The deranged woke mob can't even get their narrative straight. Then again, this is a movement that can't define what a woman is, in the first place.

reply

, at first I was quite shocked at Fox's tirade (I actually saw it first hand on the transmission night) thinking wow whats with him? (basically relegating her, annoying as she is, to that level) but then I looked on twitter and see shed been doing the 'im not gonna sh*g you' joke thing in tweets and so Fox was obviously referencing that ..but it then took on a life of its own in the msm (looking at it without the intricates of the tweets), and the fact she wasn't that known it looked like an attack by the well known firecly right wing much older Fox on this young woman journo really and as a result he finally goes down/full level cancelled and takes the giggling Dan Woottan with him! (who was already in abit of trouble) and strikes a fierce blow to GBNews (Woottan was a big player there , basically what Piers Morgan is to TalkTV Woottan is to GBNews)

reply

There's an important difference though. Fox made these comments on broadcast television. You can't just say the same things you say in the cesspit of social media on British TV. TV is subject to regulations that do not apply to social media (or even to print journalism).

GB News has already been found in breach of its licence by Ofcom four times (three considered 'significant' breaches) during its short existence. There are two investigations still ongoing.

This presumably explains why GB News hasn't attempted to stand by their man on this matter. They need to get their house in order to avoid fines (and potentially much further down the line losing their broadcast licence).

Ofcom have gone easy on them so far, presumably because they're a newcomer to the market and there's an acceptance that there will be teething problems. But they do have to be seen to be cleaning up their act.

reply