"That article is 1200 words long, and there are a hundred other articles just like it from all the other major news outlets. Why did it take so much effort to correct such a simple factual matter? How many words were dedicated to absolving Papa Johns CEO for using the N word in context? None."
Deflection much? I gave you a break down of how the whole "Hillary laughed at a Rape victim" story unfolded and was used as a political weapon. If Hillary's at fault for anything, she didn't get in front of this LIE and call Trump out for twisting an interview where she giggled about the unreliability of polygraph tests in trials, which btw are generally not admissible as evidence in trials of all natures.
"As a highly immoral person myself, I would gladly defend a guilty rapist by questioning a young woman's "sluttiness". What I wouldn't do is expect to be praised as a political champion of women's rights by all corners of the media. That is a media that hates women and uses them as dumb objects who will vote for wars and bailouts as long as you say nice things about them."
Well then you're just speaking for yourself, not Hillary. Also, Trump praised Hillary as a wonderful woman after he won so I guess he's part of that "media" you speak of. Not to mention he used the rape victim at the debate and then we never heard from her again after the election, but those lawsuits against him are still there. Trump knows a lot about using women as objects (sexual, political hit pieces, etc.) just look at his excellent track record of calling Black women Dogs, Low IQ people, and Rodeo Clowns.
reply
share