Matt has not been this close to mumbet one since early White Collar when he was ranked 5th.
He was at the VeuveClicquot polo match today looking dapper and he flys to Manhattan to be on Live Kelly for Tuesday's show and he just celebrated his 39th birthday plus plugged water.org donations in his name. Busy week.
Thanks Maggie. What exactly is starmeter? Is that the imdb system where they monitor clicks on actors' pages?
shareMaybe there is no such thing as "bad publicity". And maybe some can donate to the water aid fundraiser, only at a disappointing 48%
Matt looked great at the polo & Tiffany, though I though some of the others dressed very casual for polo. I wait in hope for pictures of Simon at either or both occasions. Tiffany was a benefit for Art of Elysium, isn't that one of Matt's charities?
And it reminded me how gorgeous Matt would look dressed in polo kit!
Yes
share48% of 10k goal. 2 yrs ago his goal was 5k and he got more than $7700, so not a bad start.
I don't know anyone in Hollywood who does more charitable gigs.
Elton John I consider UK.
He's gone down on Starmeter to 321. All the hoopla for him co-hosting @KellyLive on October 18th 2016 for him to 55. Now he has slid to 321.
How does this affect him getting roles? Or is it immaterial?
In the past 20 days he co-hosted her show and was a Hamilton Host for Kelly Ripa's opening Halloween skit. He and Simon posed with his munchkins for their annual Halloween family photo. His first print ad for SmartWater debued and THR and other media were wondering where Matt Bomer is with only 2 episodes left of AHS6. Not to mention him tweeting congrats to his TLT costar Lily Collins for winning at The Hollywood Awards. It's all supposed to be based on clicks. If all Matt fans rewatch Kelly Ripa's October 18th 2016 show, will that up his meter ranking?
Good question, I'd like to know, as well.
Also - does clicking on this board help at all?
There's this...
http://www.imdb.com/help/show_leaf?prowhatisstarmeter
...so clicking on the board repeatedly doesn't help. Kind of? I'd guess it's because of IP addresses. Logged in users visiting the page repeatedly also doesn't work I think.
Maybe we should conduct an experiment or something XD Try visiting the page using various different devices (like from internet cafes), also without logging in.
Interesting. Thanks kinkin. Looks like I'll have to start logging out more often.
share