5'6'???
She looks closer to 5'9" or maybe 5'10". I had no idea she was that short.
shareThis message has been deleted by an administrator
shareShe is 5''6.
shareShe looks closer to 5'9" or maybe 5'10". I had no idea she was that short.
That's a neither-tall-nor-short height. Any woman taller that 5'5" isn't really that short. Hilary Swank never looked as tall as Nicole Kidman to me
What? A signature?
Actually 5'9 is considered a bit tall for a female.
Be thankful for every new day! ξ½
She looks y'all because she has good proportions--a tall woman's proportions.
shareYou and your illusions on boards- you did not stand next to her at White Horse Tavern - you just stood next to horse. That is a difference.π
shareSince when is 5' 6" short...especially for a female?
Shorter is better anyway...nothing like a li'l spinner...ξ
.....................Sometimes ya gotta wonder.... ξ²
I would say she looks a bit taller - 5'7", maybe 5'8".
5'9"? No way.
5'10"? You must be kidding... 5'10" is pretty tall for women. When an actress is 5'10" there is no way her IMDb page would have 5'6" as her height. 5'10" is enough to be marked as a very tall actress.
Examples: Charlize Theron, Tilda Swinton, Connie Nielsen, Laura Dern, Mira Sorvino...