MovieChat Forums > Britney Spears Discussion > She is ill

She is ill

posted 4 years ago by Dainty (2072)
18 replies | jump to latest

Most people have no idea how conservatorship works. It's common in Norway. Embezzlement is illegal.

[–] JoWilli2 (855) 4 years ago

did u see her post about getting an ipad, she is straight up looney and she is only 40. its sad to see...

[–] kuatorises (7467) 4 years ago

She's definitely not all there. I have NO IDEA if her dad is ripping her off - he very well could be - but it's very clear she's mentally ill.

[–] ebhaynz (3760) 4 years ago

I think you're right she's mentally ill. I'm not sure if she's bi polar or schizophrenic it's very sad when it hits people when they're young.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 4 years ago

Bi polar has been rumored for a while, but yeah, I can see either that or schizophrenia. You see that cringey iPad video? Like a deranged child. The now near constant "thirst trap" pics? It's just so pathetic to watch. I definitely feel bad for the woman, but she clearly can't care for herself or kids.

[–] ebhaynz (3760) 4 years ago

I haven't see her iPad video, kinda scared to take a look at it...I feel really sorry for people who are mentally ill, it so often hits people when their young it's unfair. Have you ever heard about that young actress that had roles in Caddyshack and Animal House? There's a long thread about her mental illness hit her hard around age 20-25 and basically since then she hasn't had much of a life.

[–] Galactus03 (4406) 3 years ago

STFU. I just saw the video. She was not looney. Silly excited YES. She was having fun with her fans. She has been denied a lot of stuff over the years because of the conservatorship. An ipad apprently was one of them. So again STFU...

[–] Otter (24464) 4 years ago

It's pretty certain she has some form of mental illness, but of course, we don't know if it's severe enough for her to really need a conservator, or if her family is abusing the conservatorship process to protect her fame and fortune.

And we *can't* know, because it's illegal for her family, the court, or her doctors to release any kind of medical information to the public. There are laws (google JCAHO) that protect medical information and patient privacy.

[–] PrimeMinisterX (8859) 4 years ago

Certain according to what specific actions? How did you arrive at this conclusion?

[–] Otter (24464) 4 years ago

Oh, the various things she did in public, the fact that she qualified for conservatorship, the fact that she discussed medication vs. overmedication with the judge, the hospitalizations and psychologists, etc.

So it's highly, highly likely that she's mentally ill in some way, we don't know whether she's mentally ill enough to need a conservator... and we can't know.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 4 years ago

Come on, man. The woman had a public mental breakdown. This is well-known.

There's also this little incident, which people seem to forget about: https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/59724/spears-baby-driving-incident-a-mistake.

She qualified for a conservatorship to begin with. That doesn't just happen. It happens because of the type of behavior mentioned above.

Oh, and she's been on meds for at least 5 years. She is on the record saying this:

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/britney-spears-lithium-194111995.html

“He immediately, the next day, put me on lithium out of nowhere. He took me off my normal meds I’ve been on for five years,” Britney told the court.

We know she's been hospitalized and she - a woman fighting for her freedom - refused a psych eval: https://cafemom.com/entertainment/britney-spears-pysch-evaluation-conservatorship puts posting semi-nude pics of herslef on her social media above proving her mental health. She's not even smart enough to realize that. You don't prove you are capable of taking care of yourself by refusing to prove your sanity and posting titty pics.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

The reality is lots of people have nervous breakdowns, but the overwhelming majority of them recover and move on.

As for driving with a kid in her lap, that's not something that signals you are mentally ill, only that you are stupid. And being stupid doesn't mean the person needs a conservatorship.

So lets just accept she is on some sort of meds, fair enough but the vast majority of people on meds are not also under conservatorships. Now I would fully support locking the schizos of the world in mental hospitals for life, but what isn't how it is supposed to work. The real problem is the system allows for people to get conservatorships of family members if they have enough money whether the person they are trying to get one on needs it or not. All it really takes is lots of money or the person they are trying to get one on having some breakdown that allows the family to quickly make a move and get one... In this case Spears conservatorship started when she got fed up with photographers chaseing her around and attacked the car one was in with an umbrella, that resulted in the police arriving her continuing to be mad as hell and them putting her in a hospital for a involuntary evaluation, at which time the family went to court for a conservatorship... So it wasn't her shaving her head, or driving with a kid in her lap it was the act of getting pissed off at a person taking her picture that got her put in a hospital for an evaluation that allowed the conservatorship to be placed on her in the first place. that then becomes the problem as once someone is placed in a conservatorship it is hard as hell to get it eliminated. What is truly troubling here is that the judge over the case is the same one that put it on her to begin with... someone should probably look at the bank account of the judge and see if there have been any funny deposits near the times that spears goes to court.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 4 years ago

Accept she is on meds? Bro, she is QUOTED in that Yahoo! article. She states she's been medicated for at least 5 years. You casually dismiss that, as if it's a rumor. It's not.

Then you dismiss her breakdown, dismiss her putting her own infant in danger, and then accuse the judge of "being in on it." Stop it. You are in outright denial.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Lots of people are on meds for mental problems, lots of them even longer than 5 years and yet they are not placed in a conservatorship... lots of parents put their kids in dangers doing stupid things yet are not placed in a conservatorship... And the breakdown is also not something the typically leads a person to be placed in a permanent conservatorship.

Odds are the judge is on the take, because you can't explain this any other way. Remember if this woman is nutty as fuck to the point that she requires a conservatorship then why the fuck did they have her perform like a dancing monkey for years in Vegas? It doesn't make logical sense. If she is so fucked that she can't decide anything in her life then she shouldn't be performing in Vegas.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 4 years ago

"Odds are the judge is on the take, because you can't explain this any other way."

Certainly no other explanation than the judge, lawyers, doctors, her dad and sister, her maid and everyone else around her being in on it...

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

You don't need anyone other than the judge to be in on it. It's easy to shop around for doctors who will say what you want, just look at the ACT scandal, you had parents shopping around for psychiatrists that would say their little darlings had problems just so they could get extra time on a test. You seem very naive about what you can do with money.

[–] Abed303 (282) 3 years ago

Oh the irony!

Not once does Kuatorises make any assertions about what can or cannot be accomplished with wealth.
Kuatorises doesn't immediately subscribe to the notion, without evidence, that a conspiracy involving nearly everyone in Britney's life is responsible for holding that healthy life hostage. That does not make them naive.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 3 years ago

Don't be ridiculous! What's more likely? Brit Brit being insane or every. single. person. in her life being in on it? *adjusts tinfoil hat*

[–] Galactus03 (4406) 3 years ago

that was 15 years ago....you idiot...