I can't believe how young she was on Married with Children
Caught a rerun of some episode from 1990 today, thought she was in her late 40's there, looked her up, and she was only 36?!..
Caught a rerun of some episode from 1990 today, thought she was in her late 40's there, looked her up, and she was only 36?!..
Maybe it was the bouffant hairdo?
shareI was mainly noting the condition of her skin. 36 should look a lot more youthful.
I mean, what she should really be looking like is like she is way too young to have kids that age already, but you never doubted that she was plenty old enough to be their mother, did you?
But considering she was only 32 when the show started, she really was.
You're right about the hairdo being a factor. Some people refer to this as retrospective aging.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjqt8T3tJIE&t=4m5s
Because there is such a visible difference between 36 and late 40's........πππππ
shareWell, I thought she was like 48-49, at least. There SHOULD be a visible difference between 36 and that.
What a ridiculous reply, really - it's like you've never seen a normal-looking 36y.o. woman.
She looked exactly her age in the 1990s (as someone in her thirties), so I don't understand how anyone could have thought otherwise.
shareI think it was the trashy look of her character. I didn't think she was attractive until I saw her outside the show.
share