MovieChat Forums > Guy Ritchie Discussion > 'King Arthur' Bombs: Why Guy Ritchie's L...

'King Arthur' Bombs: Why Guy Ritchie's Latest Was a Royal Miss

posted 8 years ago by Variety
2 replies | jump to latest

The weekend tallies and critical and audience consensus are the result of a years-in-the-making story, eventually directed by Guy Ritchie and starring Charlie Hunnam. So how did the big-budget film become what could be remembered as the biggest flop of ... read full story on Variety

[–] AtomicReturns (1252) 8 years ago

Yup, please take him off of the upcoming Aladdin remake. I don't want him doing it. While his Sherlock movies have made a lot of money (around $550 million WW for both films), he then screws up King Arthur. His successes are too few and far between, and the results are too erratic.

What do you think? Keep him for the live action Aladdin or search for another director? I hope it's not too late to find another one.

[–] vicky_lc2001 (1907) 7 years ago

I liked King Arthur and honestly prefer it over the Sherlock Holmes films.