She was not born in 1969
nor in 1971 as she claims to be. If she was born in 1971 she would have been 12 or 13 when she did Bolero and if she´s born in 1969 she would have been 14 or 15 when she did that film.
nor in 1971 as she claims to be. If she was born in 1971 she would have been 12 or 13 when she did Bolero and if she´s born in 1969 she would have been 14 or 15 when she did that film.
This message has been deleted by the poster
sharecases like this(movie-nudity under 16) from the USA are not unheard of. there seems to be a lot of confusion about their legal status, but i'm almost certain they were legal to make there under the right conditions at some point.
shareShe was born in 1969. Official records prove it. She most definitely was not born in 1971.
http://content.ancestry.co.uk/iexec/default.aspx?htx=List&dbid=8964&offerid=0%3a7858%3a0
She is listed in the January 1969 files as Olivia Jane d'Abo. We know it's the same woman because it has her parents' names listed beside her name.
That's why those films were controversial, because of her age. Her parents just had to give permission.
Bush. Like a rock. Only dumber.
poppy- an obvious brain washed liberal.
sharepoppy- an obvious brain washed liberal.
burvegas - An obvious troll.
WTF does liberal have anything to do with the FACT that Olivia was born in 1969? If you have a problem with the FACT that Olivia was 14/15 when Bolero was made, take it up with her.
Bush. Like a rock. Only dumber.
Probably they are referring to your Bush bashing sig
shareCould be. Oh, the irony of them calling me "obvious brain washed liberal" because I don't agree with their politics. So much for democracy.
Bush. Like a rock. Only dumber.
Could be. Oh, the irony of them calling me "obvious brain washed liberal" because I don't agree with their politics. So much for democracy.
WTF does democracy have to do with it?
I hate when people pull the "freedom of speech" card every time one person disagrees with another about anything remotely political...
If you say something in public that someone else disagrees with, they have the freedom and the right to call you out on it(see Dixie Chicks).
If a non-government organization decides that they don't like you, they have the freedom and the right not to let you have your say on their dime(see Dixie Chicks) unless it's a political ad.
While the internet is a boon for free speech, the first amendment is non-existent while visiting someone else's site/page... unless it is owned by the government.
Freedom of speech only works against the government, the government cannot (legally)silence you... but everybody else can.