Am I the only one who would've voted not guilty?
He's probably guilty, but the cop who investigated him literally refused to say whether or not he planted evidence. If that's not reasonable doubt, I don't know what is.
shareHe's probably guilty, but the cop who investigated him literally refused to say whether or not he planted evidence. If that's not reasonable doubt, I don't know what is.
shareI missed that part of the trial. yeah that sure does point to REASONABLE DOUBT.
shareCLEARLY NOT...HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY.
shareI don't believe he was guilty (way too many implausibilities) but indeed even if he did, the f*ckery of the LAPD's gross mishandling of evidence, exacerbated by a corrupt, perjuring cop, with a history of planting evidence & who refused to deny that he planted evidence on Simpson(Are you f*cking kidding me?). It's a no brainer. Not guilty by reasonable doubt.
shareHe was 100% Guilty. Det.Tom Lange has stated in interviews there were more than 300 pieces of evidence not introduced at the trial due to Marcia Clark believing they had enough already. Everyone knew it was payback for Rodney King and he was going to skip no matter what was presented. I'm just glad he screwed up in Vegas.
share