she is aging horribly, and has been since 2005

Just who does she think she is, ageing every year like it's some kind of natural occurrence?

Well, I don't know how she looks first thing in the morning with no makeup, but I saw her on TV the other day as a guest on someone's show, and she was absolutely stunning. She's only 43 and that's not old these days.

HA! luke, your comment is funny, coming from someone who was freaked out by "all the nudity" in 50 Shades of Grey...and who gave the stinkin' Patty Duke Show a rating of 10! You must be pretty effin old, yourself! How bout a recent photograph, for the record? Then we can all see how old YOU look. LoL.




With our thoughts, we make our World.

you are an imbecile and completely stupid. how I look has nothing to do with anything. I'm not an actor I don't get paid money to look good. so I don't have to. Amanda Peet does thus her looking old is not acceptable. and I wasn't freaked out by all the nudity in fifty shades of grey I was just extremely surprised by all the nudity in said film. It had an unbelievable amount of nudity, more than I can ever remember seeing in a Hollywood mainstream film. and just because I like an old show doesn't mean that I'm old.

French imbécile, noun, from adjective, weak, weak-minded, from Latin imbecillus
First Known Use: 1802.

I think you are describing yourself, Sir, as only an Imbecile would look at Amanda Peet and see anything but a beautiful, vibrant, totally "ACCEPTABLE" human being. Look again.

and......Get a Life!

With our thoughts, we make our World.

the fact that you are saying her looking beautiful, vibrant, and like a totally acceptable human being is a fact and is non debatable means that you are an imbecile. she is without a doubt very ugly and very old looking, so she is therefore unsuitable as an actress.

YOU get a life! You are an idiot. fuc# off!

I have to agree. I hadn't seen her in quite some time in anything noteworthy and then recently I did and I came here to check her age and was stunned that she's only 43. However, I zeroed it down to what I'm certain what it is: her eyes. In the last few years, her jewel of eyes have started to develop a ptosys, droopy eyelids (something that happens a lot with aging especially with women and those with large, normally expressive eyes. Many female celebs go through this and then ultimately fix it by having am eyelid surgery; a simple
procedure very common. But if she did that that would solve her problem I'm sure of it. It would make her look refreshed, alert and yes younger. That is the only reason of why she appears old now, her eyes make her look tired and worn out. Beyond that, she's still stunningly beautiful.

she is without a doubt very ugly and very old looking, so she is therefore unsuitable as an actress.

Mediocre trolling skills, dude. Seriously. Since when is acting analogous with people who are only young and gorgeous? Besides, it is merely your opinion she is "old looking" and "ugly." So this all is moot.

Better trolling next time.