MovieChat Forums > Amanda Peet Discussion > population vs. vaccination

population vs. vaccination


please note that the population has always in the modern medical world been higher percentage percentage female than male. in that case the autism rate would be closer to 50/50, rather than heavuly male as the situation is now. all of my generation {boomers} had all these shots and a few of us actually had polio and survived it...both of my grandsobs will be spared this horrible, painful, life changing disease...after the fact i took the vaccine, sugar cube....ask your grandpartents...etc. trust me it's not the vaccine!

reply

No you didn't have all of these shots.

Here's a look at the differences in the vaccine schedule from 1983 to 2010:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-p09qf-kThMU/TzkkdY7OVcI/AAAAAAAAABs/fGej0hYfMxM/s1600/iPhoto.app.jpg

10 vs 36~38, and this chart is outdated because in 2012 it's now up to 49 doses of 14+ vaccines by age 6.

Not sure what your thoughts are on autism rates, but here's a study that showed not a single female in this group suffered from thimerosal's effects while all the male mice did -

Gender-selective toxicity of thimerosal.

Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2009 Mar;61(2):133-6. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

Branch DR, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract
A recent report shows a correlation of the historical use of thimerosal in therapeutic immunizations with the subsequent development of autism; however, this association remains controversial. Autism occurs approximately four times more frequently in males compared to females; thus, studies of thimerosal toxicity should take into consideration gender-selective effects. The present study was originally undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of thimersosal in male and female CD1 mice. However, during the limited MTD studies, it became apparent that thimerosal has a differential MTD that depends on whether the mouse is male or female. At doses of 38.4-76.8mg/kg using 10% DMSO as diluent, seven of seven male mice compared to zero of seven female mice tested succumbed to thimerosal. Although the thimerosal levels used were very high, as we were originally only trying to determine MTD, it was completely unexpected to observe a difference of the MTD between male and female mice. Thus, our studies, although not directly addressing the controversy surrounding thimerosal and autism, and still preliminary due to small numbers of mice examined, provide, nevertheless, the first report of gender-selective toxicity of thimerosal and indicate that any future studies of thimerosal toxicity should take into consideration gender-specific differences.

reply

The reality is the original study that showed a connection between vaccinations and autism was valid, however the results of the study never implied that vaccinations would result in autism only that there was a small statistically significant correlation. The problem is that because the government in their pro-vaccination stance went to extremes to discredit the study by cherry picking which subjects would be rejected from the study it stuck to high heaven.

The original study wasn't flawed, it simply provided a result that pro-vaccine groups didn't want to be true so they manipulated the results and that has caused people to believe their is a conspiracy afoot and those people are right. The pro-vaccine groups cannot be trusted because they have shown they are not willing to follow science and accept the results of legitimate studies, that they will manipulate the studies to get the results they want to see.

I don't reject vaccinations, but I didn't have my kids vaccinated based on the sequence the doctors wanted. They were vaccinated when they were much older and never with vaccines that contained thimerosal. What most people don't realize is that you can get most vaccines without thimerosal if you request them and are willing to pay a bit more for them.

reply

Vaccines have changed dramatically in the last 50 years. Children are also getting more of them now, at a younger age, than they were 50 years ago. Do some research. Go to fourteenstudies.org
There's a lot of fascinating info out there. I'm not anti-vax, per se. I don't believe all these vaccinations while a child is developing is healthy. I work with children that have autism and I have not met a single parent who didn't think the vaccines caused autism. How can you ignore that after a series of shots, a child gets sick, has a fever, and then stops developing? My mother saw it happen to both of my sisters.

reply

What does this have to do with Amanda Peet?

Sartre was right. Hell is other people.

reply

give it a rest plato

reply

Haha.

reply

You want me to fuck your WHAT?!

reply

That's what I was thinking as well.

reply

I heard she's an Anti-Waxer

reply

not at all. she's been a pro-vax campaigner.

i don't understand why anyone would care that a famous person is pro-vax, but i don't understand why anyone would care about jenny mccarthy or jim carrey's anti-vax views.

at least peet is saying the right thing instead of misleading things.

reply

5 years from now, we will see the effects of Brandons mandatory vaccinations.

reply

We've already seen a MASSIVE spike in excess deaths in one year alone, plus incalculable amounts of injuries.

We'll probably see even MORE irreversible side-effects in five years thanks to Beijing Brandon's democide lunacy.

reply

yep, doctors have already said that they are seeing an uptick in heart related conditions. the fact is, that no one knows the long term effects of a mRNA vaccine. I had to explain to my dad that it manipulates your RNA to fight off the virus. he was not aware of this before he got the shot. he has had 3 shots now but is still doing well.

I think a lot of people didnt know what a mRNA vaccine was before they got it.

The Government forcing people to get a vaccine just proves how easily controlled we are. What else are they capable of forcing us to do? scary stuff...

reply

I had to explain to my dad that it manipulates your RNA to fight off the virus. he was not aware of this before he got the shot. he has had 3 shots now but is still doing well.


Exactly.

Studies like this one show that there are extremely scary long-term side-effects even when you think you're safe:
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

Line changes in the DNA months after injection, even after the media yelled to the moon that mRNA doesn't change your DNA.

There is intracellular penetration that occurs, and there's really no telling when it may occur. If messengers get into the venous system then it's just a matter of time before an AE or SAE occurs. The immune system then becomes a ticking time bomb for a cytokine storm, which will lead to clotting, and eventually organ failure.

There are a lot of people who say "Hurr durr, I'm fine after getting my shot. No signs after a few months. They're not that bad!"

while completely ignoring that not everyone's DNA is the same, not everyone's immune system reacts the same, and the messenger travel isn't going to be identical for everyone. It's also absolutely frustrating given that once the messengers hit the bloodstream all studies have shown 100% of the time they eventually cause clotting in humans (for better or for worse, depending on the intended treatment).

For the last two decades the studies have all shown the same thing when mRNA travels intravenously, yet so many people just refuse to listen to the actual science:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17168737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851071/
https://thrombosisjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-9560-9-9
https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mmr.2013.1344

You're absolutely right that the government forcing people to take deadly experimental drugs really does show how easily people can be roped into harming themselves while being told it's for their own good.

reply