Well, when you read responses upon these boards concerning someone's agreeing with a poster's remarks, you may consider those as cop-outs of sorts because a responder might have little of note to add, but in this case, your essay rings so completely true that one would definitely have to consider that as a definitive reply, saying it all, and leaving nothing which anyone may add.
So, I agree completely, and agree that "that says it all."
But for a bit of additional information, the former A&E series "Biography" has an episode focusing upon Robby Benson (2002), when that program was heading into its homestretch (#911 of 1190) and winding down a bit in quality of production
"Robby Benson: From Boy to Beast... and Beyond," r
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0777316/combined
According to this, Robby (whom I occasionally mistake as "Robbie" for some strange reason) discusses his health problems of the mid-1980's (and probably ongoing), which also may have contributed a factor or two in his career decline.
So, as former posters have been commenting upon Robby's outstanding looks as hype to draw in the audiences for, oh, just about any old program, his outstanding looks really have accomplished such a purpose to magnetize captivated viewers to place Robbie at center stage, to the point which everyone and everything else about the show remains forgotten from the start.
And now, these days, according to IMDb's recent photographs, even Robby does not care one bit upon his looks, what with that mangy bears and unkempt hair and wild, wild wilderness appearance.
But if anyone has really gotten by on his looks, then one contender for the title, or at least a nomination, may have been that one, long before today's audiences ask, "Am i missing something?"
So, no, Robby really didn't need very much acting talent back in those days.
If Sheridan were here, he'd be appalled.
reply
share