her boyfriends keep getting younger
some musician named Goody Grace.
https://www.tmz.com/2020/04/13/kate-beckinsale-holding-hands-dating-22-year-old-goody-grace/
Nah, she's just a typical Leo, who refuses to grow old gracefully.
Just look at Madonna (also a Leo).
Wow there's still idiots out there that believe in star signs.
shareThat's your ignorance talking, I'm afraid. If you actually did some research, you would discover that astrology is far more complex than mere star signs.
A star (or sun) sign governs the ego. Other aspects of a person's personality are governed by other planets. These can all be determined by generating a natal chart, which is as unique as a fingerprint.
Bearing all that in mind, Leos are notorious for being superficial and ageist in the love department. That's how their egos work in such matters.
Hahahahaha you're nuts. Pseudoscience at its worst.
shareNo, I'm just better than you at introspection and self-awareness...
I thought you were joking but now i'm actually worried. You know there's absolutely zero quantifiable scientific evidence to back up anything you're saying? If it's just a hobby of yours then fine, but don't act like there's any real science behind it.
shareIt's actually all about psychology. Well, that's what I use astrology for.
Btw, I don't believe in horoscopes. Now, that's a load of rubbish.
What a complete load of rubbish!
shareHave you ever looked into it? From your responses, I highly doubt it.
You can't write something off you haven't tried to understand - that's narrow-mindedness.
Yeah, I'm narrow minded because I don't believe that planets, suns, stars, etc., govern peoples personalities. Do you not realize how ridiculous that sounds and is?
shareHas science managed to explain why humans have souls? No? Exactly...
As I said before, you've written something off without even trying to understand it, which can easily be done with a bit of reading and reflection on past interactions with others (friends, family, lovers, etc.).
Ever heard of Schumann resonances? That's scientific and involves the electromagnetic resonances of planets (especially Earth). Astrology is about energies and the interplay of such energies between planets.
Now, going back to the thread, Leos are afraid of growing old or appearing to look old - Mick Jagger is yet another example. Some Leos manage to get over it but that's one of the attributes of their ego (i.e. sun).
WHAT??? Humans have souls... Why would science need to explain that... as it makes no scientific sense...
Do animals have souls too... or is it only humans?
Dude, calm down. This discussion is within the confines of humans. Why you feel the need to bring animals, in general, into this is beyond me...
Basically we were once animals...
But if you actually believe humans have souls fine by me... and luckily for you... you will never know that you were wrong;-)
Correction, we are still animals...
I just don't know why you had to bring other types of animals into the equation, when this discussion pertained to human beings.
I just find it amazing how some of you get really hostile when someone mentions astrology. It doesn't matter whether you believe in it or not, in the greater scheme of things, it's still a valid point.
For example, if I read someone's basic natal table, I would get a rough idea of their personality solely from that. Very rarely is an educated interpretation far off.
Kate Beckinsale is acting like a typical Leo who can't accept that she's getting old. Other sun signs accept ageing far better than Leos. But, then again, Leos are usually extremely vain with an inflated (and unjustifiable) sense of self-worth.
Am I not hostile and by all means use astrology to whatever you want... It was your statement that humans have souls which I found funny... were is your proof of these so called souls?
shareHas science managed to explain why humans have souls? No? Exactly...
And this, right here, shows your pseudoscientific mindset. It assumes as fact something that is not in evidence. Science has not even established that anything called a soul even exists -- and it's not because there has been any shortage of people trying to prove there is either. In fact there's no evidence for one. Maybe something called a sould exists, and maybe it doesn't. Maybe there is an afterlife, and maybe there isn't, but either way, there's no evidence for it. And in fact, the best evidence would seem to indicate otherwise. Not only has there never been any supposed proof of the existence of a soul or afterlife that has ever withstood scientific scrutiny; it is also necessary to explain -- if the mind is fundamentally a component of one's soul -- how one's personality can be permanently altered by brain trauma. There is no evidence that the mind, one's conciousness, is anything other than the elecrochemical activity of the brain. share
Soul, personality... semantics.
Besides, based on your explanation, most humans should (in theory) be identical and practically clones of each other. And, no, I'm not putting words in your mouth - that's basically what you said.
No, it's actually not even remotely what I said. And what on earth could possibly lead you to conclude I am suggesting we should all basically be clones of each other -- that is about the most enormous leap of logic I have ever seen. We share 98.8% of our DNA with chimps. That tiny, 1.2% difference is enough to make an entirely different species of animal. DNA is so complex, and there are so many possible combinations within chromosomes that far more subtle differences cause individuals within given species to be wholly, radically different beings. And as they lives their lives, their neural networks, memory, brain structure, built up from their own unique life experiences evolves and grows to differentiate them from each other still further.
Everything you just wrote is not just nonsense, it's nonsense on stilts.
LMAO. Science have no proof that souls exist. Come on man !
shareWhen Western science is able to have an answer for EVERYTHING then come back to me. Until then, you and the other hostile responders are acting like an indoctrinated tools.
Cheerio!
There is no "Western science". There is only science PERIOD! The scientific method is the same EVERYWHERE. Anything other than science is a PSEUDO-science and therefore rely on belief. NOT facts.
Now who's indoctrinated?
[deleted]