What is your preference? I personally think Ann-Margret looks more sexy and attractive as a sixty some year old then as a young girl swooning over Elvis. What does everyone else think?
shareThis message has been deleted by an administrator
shareObviously she's not ugly for a woman past 60. But, I simply could not understand on how anybody would find her sexier now then before. A better comparison would be the 60s starlet cutie vs the mature, 70s-80s actress. I like both, but I find it ridiculous to think she's sexier at 65 than at 30. She was unbelievably good looking from 1961 to maybe 1993, but there is an end to sexiness. And she's certainly reached it.
shareIn the baby blue pant-suit in Tommy.
shareI think 70s-80s is what he MEANT ... if he meant now, when he said middle aged, that would be fine (if she were going to live to be 130, lol).
shareI think she was at her sexiest in her late 30s.
shareI like em' young, so I'll choose the latter :p.
shareAnn-Margret has so much charisma that it is hard for me to take my eyes off of her when she is on the screen. Her younger roles or those she has now--doesn't matter to me. I have loved her for over 30 years. She is one of the few women I would ever consider going straight for.
Where have you gone, J. Lo? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
I think when she was younger mainly because her look was softer back then she was and still is a stunner.I think she goes too brassy at times in her look and I hate when she over fusses with her hair.I think she was at her best in her 20's and 30' maybe a bit beyond that.Still I think she's always beautiful.I just wish she was a bit softer in her look.
share