bruce willis vs mel gibson

mel is much better at acting. Reason - even in mediocre movie about american war for independence he gave an ocar worthy performance. Who does that? Only Mel could pull that off. Bruce Willis is an iconic almost actor but he never did that much "acting" roles.

Mel is immeasurably superior as an actor, with far greater range. Maybe more importantly, Mel gives 110% in every role he's ever had. In half of Willis' movies, you might not even be able to properly gauge his talent because he looks like he's just there for a paycheck and is sleepwalking through the whole thing.

I like Willis, but Mel is a much better actor with a much greater range. He's a great director too.

Mel in two rounds.

What we got here is... failure to communicate!

What about Pulp Fiction? 12 Monkeys? Hell, even the Kid was a pretty good role for him

This is an easy choice. Mel is one of the best actors of all time, Bruce is not.

I watched Blood Father twice in the last week. It was a fantastic film, and after seeing it, I have gained even more respect for Mel as an actor/artist and lost even more respect for Bruce. Mel will do only projects that mean something to him and he will put every ounce of effort and passion into it, as shown by his amazing performance in Blood Father.

For some reason, Bruce will just take whatever roles he can get for as much money as possible, not caring about the quality of the film or his performance. There's no comparison between the two. In the prime of their careers, Mel was already a much better actor. At this point, the difference is light years apart between the two.

Opinion: I think your orthography and punctuation skills gave me cancer...