MovieChat Forums > Natalie Portman Discussion > Gratuitous photoshoots

Gratuitous photoshoots

posted 8 years ago by Dan_Garten
4 replies | jump to latest

She's apparently not above doing gratuitous photoshoots. There's the underwear shoot to go with her New York Times e-mail article. Now, she's doing a lesbian-ish W magazine cover with Ruth Negga that has nothing to do with anything.

Not that I'm complaining. 

[–] CountJohn 8 years ago

I thought the NYT thing was classy and tastefully done.

That whole W photoshoot was just weird. They had people in vaguely sexual poses with with what appeared to be disembodied body parts from mannequins. 

[–] dexx-26415 8 years ago

The worst part of the article was the stupid twee emails

[–] the_professor530 8 years ago

OP sure has a mild opinion of what gratuitous means. Gratuitous? Hardly.

[–] bobbydallas (8523) 4 years ago

they looked pretty PG-13 to me. what you talkin about OP ?