MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Nymphomania and sex positions, could the...

Nymphomania and sex positions, could they indicate this?

posted a month ago by Kj1oceanlust (1528)
14 replies | jump to latest

I think this will be a good one, lol. I had a conversation with a male friend once about sex position preferences. And he told me he just broke up with his second gf in a few months. And he's been divorced for just over a year. Okay, this guy told me lots about his sex life lol. The long and short was, his wife loved doggy and reverse cowgirl positions. And he figures she began cheating on him with in the first year of marriage. They were only married for 2 years. And both of his previous gf's also loved the doggy position and riding in different ways, lol. And they both broke up with him fast and with little or no explanation. He said his wife and him had an amazing sex life and got along rather well, but he called it quits after learning about her infidelities. He said the sex he had with the gf's was good also. And he sums up his failed relationships and marriage with the women being nympho's who could not keep their legs closed. But this gets more interesting, we both have male friends, both married for many years, and both their wives we understand primarily prefer missionary and occasional riding. But they also don't get sex on a frequent consistent basis. So could this mean women who prefer reverse cowgirl and doggy, who are possibly nympho's aren't relationship material?

[–] Kowalski (79077) a month ago

OH MY GOD.😂

[–] FredBurroughs (22283) a month ago

Hahaha, can't wait for the replies from sexless regulars offering baseless speculation and projection.

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (13152) a month ago

If you're cute I'll give you a reach around.

[–] Hectiche (122) a month ago

Women are not a monolith.

[–] MarkPh (1029) a month ago

This is certainly the most absurd excuse anyone has ever come up with, to explain why relationships are failing.
But since we're at it already, how about some serious facts aside of all the kidding?

Relationships depend mostly on two major factors that are both widely ignored by people picking a partner.

1) Genetic compatibility
Women can literally smell whether or not a mans genes are compatible to her own, as in "if I had a baby with that man would it likely be healthy or not". Look it up if you don't believe it, it's a science fact.
The higher the compatibility, the higher the probability for healthy babies and the better a woman will like a mans natural smell.
This goes as far as women getting turned on by a mans smell, wanting to make babies with him on first view in case of exceptionally high compatibility.
Even if they don't want children, the attraction of the mans natural smell is still the most important factor on the question whether or not a woman wants to get physical with a man and will be loyal to him.

2) Bedroom compatibility
For a lasting happy relationship it's essential that both partners have the exact same sex drive, as in wanting the same things with the same boundaries same often.
Even a small difference is a cheating waiting for an opportunity.
This means both partners have to have a good amount of experience to figure out what they like and whether or not they are compatible, either from previous partners or over years of experimenting with each other, before they can be sure that their relationship will last.

Sadly most people nowadays either don't know these two points, or ignore them and put other things like money and status on top of their list of priorities, which is the reason for a 50+% divorce rate, people simply find out the hard way that they had the wrong priorities.

[–] FredBurroughs (22283) a month ago

I appreciate your measured and nuanced response, even if the number 1 and 2 points sort of overlap.

[–] MarkPh (1029) a month ago

Yes, they partially overlap, but I think they should still be mentioned separately, because a woman loving a mans natural smell doesn't always mean she will also have the same preferences and boundaries in the bedroom.

[–] Kj1oceanlust (1528) a month ago

NO WAY! That's interesting. Maybe men shouldn't wear cologne, lol. Me and I'll call him Steve, have known each other since elementary school. Are two friends we've both known for a while also. But are two married friends, their wives are also a bit on the beefy side. Thought that may also be worth noting. Steve's wife and gf's were all rather fit and not at all lacking in the looks department. But Steve said, that in a way he should have known she would cheat, as he knew she had many previous bf's and partners. But something else that really peaked my curiosity, was he said his wife and his gf's all loved those two positions, reverse cowgirl (RC) and doggy. But I don't think I've ever known of a woman who didn't love doggy, lol. But RC, that's seems strange. Of all my raunchy escapades, (and there's been many), I think I only did RC three times. And those women were horny as fuck! At one time, I thought RC was primarily only done in porn. Maybe I was wrong.

[–] MarkPh (1029) a month ago

"Maybe men shouldn't wear cologne"
Many men try wearing cologne and it occasionally gets them a short term thing, but "the morning after" he can't hide his natural smell anymore.
If they get into a relationship anyway because the woman is after the mans money or something, it won't take long until she'll cut him short on sex simply because she doesn't really like his natural smell, even if they stay together because the man was smart enough not to let the woman get her hands on his money, from then on both sides will become what I called above "a cheating waiting for an opportunity".

What I find particularly crazy is when you hear women complaining that so many men lack hygene, because in 99% of cases that's not a matter of hygene but means the woman doesn't know about genetic compatibility and doesn't know why she doesn't like the mans natural smell.

[–] Kj1oceanlust (1528) a month ago

But after reading your initial reply, it puts in perspective rather well, why relationships imo, suck now. I've often wondered if relationships and marriages many years ago, like back in like the 1930's and on were this demanding? I mean, people are ridiculous, so often I hear women since I'm male say, "I want a relationship". Something I was told at a young age is, "give me, give me, never get's" lol. And I know others will likely say, "oh she's just stating what she wants". But I've come to detest that relationship mindset, where is, it's like "your mine". And being made to feel like there's a relationship routine to follow, and a criteria that should be met.

[–] MarkPh (1029) a month ago

Historically men were able to force women into what they wanted and prevent them from getting experience.
In old times religion dictated that men can pick women on will, they didn't even have to ask for permission, there's a passage in the Bible that literally says, if a man wants a woman all he has to do is rape her and she'll be his for life.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 "If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."

Notice, there isn't even mentioned that the woman could not want the man and then imagine what a horrible life that woman must have had, getting raped on a daily basis.

Furthermore men were picking women as virgins so the women couldn't have any experience and women couldn't know what they would like, so the men were able to brainwash the women into thinking, if they don't like sex, that's just normal and they have to do it anyway."

Nowadays that doesn't work anymore, nowadays women have rights, rarely any woman goes into marriage as a virgin and that means nowadays it's a whole different ballgame.

[–] MarkPh (1029) a month ago

If it helps you any, I myself am a good example for things working out if you keep the above two points as top priorities plus add a few more secondary conditions.
In the short form these secondary conditions come down to "equal rights all the way", as in same education, same social status, same income, because that eliminates any possible reasons to be together, other than love.

Look into the real world and you'll see, there's no amount of money that could make a difference.
On the one hand even Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world at the time, couldn't prevent his divorce and had to pay his wife $100bln.
On the other hand there are Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf, met on equal terms and are happily together to this day.

I've met a woman who loved my natural smell 3 times in my life.
The first one had children from another man while I didn't want any children (let alone from another man), so we had 4 good years together, but it was never ment to last.
The second one wasn't compatible in the bedroom, we had different preferences and we broke up after a year.
The third one I was in a relationship with for 5 years before we got married and we'll have our 20th wedding anniversary next month.

How you can know if it's the right one? Simple!
It's when after 5 years she still asks for sex just as often as you do.

[–] Zarkoff (2394) a month ago

Too small a sample size to come to any conclusions like that.

[–] JoWilli (21621) a month ago

interesting theory. my ex stopped having sex with me. we broke up because of multiple reasons but being in a sexless relationship was a part of it. I found out 2 years later that she was cheating on me with who became her husband. it made sense finally to me. she was having sex with him and became a sexless nuisance so I would break up with her so she could be the "victim".