So do you prefer an actractive sexual partner but don't care if can satisfy you or an average/ugly looking man that have a big dick and can definitely satisfy you?
By sexual partner i don't mean boyfriend/fiancee/husband , a partner just for sex , doesn't matter who.
warning: If you are male your post won't get a reply and yo will be automatically on my ignore list
Oh, I think most adult human beings are drawn to physically attractive potential partners, but if they have any sense they lose that attraction when the attractive person behaves badly.
Our hormones won't lead us to the people who'll make us happy. Never overvalue physical attraction.
You're asking this question with no knowledge of how a woman's brain works. We're not the same as men. If you think that a big cock = good sex then you have alot to learn 😕.
Very true. I'm not laughing at you. I'm laughing *with* you at the absurdity of the assumption that a big cock automatically equals sexual gratification.
Comical irony, coming from the dumbest guy on this forum (by far); the guy who can't figure out how to turn off his caps lock key and who has publicly admitted to being an idiot.
You know that you being an idiot, an admitted idiot no less, inherently negates any opinion that may pop up behind that drop-forged, case-hardened forehead of yours, right? No, I don't suppose you do, what with you being an idiot and all.
[–] MaximRecoil (3320) 2 months ago
Consider your laughable attempt at a crystal ball reading dismissed out of hand, Miss Cleo.
Also, if perfectly coherent writing looks like "ramblings" to you, it means you're stupid, obviously. Of course, you've already publicly declared idiocy countless times, so the fact that you're not the fastest car on the lot isn't exactly a revelation.
reply share ignore report
[–] Kowalski (35827) 2 months ago
YOU INVENTED THAT TALE SO YOU COULD SLIP IN THE BITS ABOUT RANDOM CHICKS DIGGING YOU AND WHAT A SWEET AS RIDE YOU HAVE...I'LL TAKE STUPID...AT LEAST I AM HONEST.😘
I obviously know what the context is, simpleton, and I also linked to the thread so that anyone else can see what the context is as well. The context changes nothing and "perspective" isn't even a relevant word here, which isn't surprising, coming from a self-professed nincompoop.
"YOU INVENTED THAT TALE SO YOU COULD SLIP IN THE BITS ABOUT RANDOM CHICKS DIGGING YOU AND WHAT A SWEET AS RIDE YOU HAVE..."
That part of your sentence is a bald-faced lie, which proves you're not "honest" like you claimed to be, and in the next part of your sentence...
"I'LL TAKE STUPID...AT LEAST I AM HONEST."
... you owned up to being stupid, and followed with another lie, a comically ironic one at that.
"When it comes to getting turned on and having a good time, Men are physical. Women are psychological."
That's not necessarily true. I've known lots of women who are "physical," and if men were only physical then those old 1-900 phone sex numbers never would have been a success (it was primarily men who called them), since you obviously can't see or touch the other person during a phone call. The same goes for "cyber sex," where there isn't even a voice to hear; there are only words on a screen.
Women tend to be more into some nebulous concept of "romance" and are also far more likely to be a "gold digger," which is 100% physical (i.e., money and the stuff it can buy), and social status. A guy who's rich, and especially a guy who's rich and famous, has women beating down his door. Wilt Chamberlain for example, claimed he slept with 20,000 women. Do you think that was because he was especially good at fulfilling the "psychological needs" of women? Obviously not.
Women are just as shallow as men are, if not more so, though they are far less likely to admit to being shallow.
YOU DO NOT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THE DEFINITIONS OF PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL...DESPITE YOUR ENDLESS WORDS ATTEMPTING TO BULLSHIT YOUR WAY INTO UNDERSTANDING.