But she looks like she's a child of about 12 or 13
As I stated she was just about 16 when the photograph was taken and she looks it. If you for your own reasons want to say she looks 12 or 13 I'll leave people to draw their own conclusions as to why you would say that.
the OP was too enthusiastic in his description of her, physically. Saying someone's a natural red head or a natural blond usually references something of a very personal nature.
I said she was exquisitely beautiful which she undeniably is. Was that "too enthusiastic" ? What amount of "enthusiasm" would have been acceptable to you ? And is it morally wrong to be "too enthusiastic" ?
What is wrong with calling her a natural red head ? Many actresses dye their hair but Sadie Sink is a natural red head. Oh but no you have chosen to interpret this comment of mine as a reference to what, her pubic hair if I have your inference correct ? But there is no way a person could reasonably ascribe that inference unless they chose to do so again for their own grubby reasons.
Then commenting "The photographer's reference to what else was blooming perhaps." These are what made it creepy.
The professional photographer has framed the photograph with the flowers centred directly behind her head. It was almost certainly a deliberate reference to the beautiful flowers as a parallel to the girls blooming beauty. Don't people liken a beautiful girl to a blooming flower in America ? But once again you I suppose have what, construed a reference to her menstruating ? Really !?
Just as happened when the poster Forsaken was driven from Moviechat and I had a go at the people who drove him off and was then thoroughly rounded on by those people this is the same style of attack. So people have been keeping their powder dry and waiting. Yes Shogun you are here. And so am I.
reply
share