MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > At what point does violence 'cross the l...

At what point does violence 'cross the line' in cinema?


In your opinion, do you think it's possible for a film to be too violent, to the point to where it shouldn't be allowed to be shown, or possibly even banned? Is such a thing even possible? And on top of that, can we not pretend like viewers around the world aren't attracted to violence in cinema. I mean, people seem to absolutely adore violence in movies.

reply

The worst I've seen is Irreversible and although I'd never watch it again I don't believe in banning films.

reply

Agreed on all of this
Ugly story but incredibly well made and affecting

Banning art is bullshit...let the grownups decide for themselves

reply

Absolutely!

reply

real violence against animals for entertainment.
i.e. The Electrocution of an Elephant

reply


Artists and viewers should be free to choose for themselves what gets created and viewed
The various rating systems, while flawed, give viewers some idea of what they are in for

I agree, violent content is at least as popular as romantic content which is odd...most of us abhor actual violence and actively pursue romance

reply

Movies that show male genital mutilation should be required to also show female genital mutilation.

reply

But what if one or the other isn't logically part of the story line? Are you saying directors should show both forms of mutilation in the same film to even the playing fields??

reply

When it spills off the screen and puts the audience in danger!

reply

Lol...indeed.

reply

Never see a movie in Kill-O-Vision😳

reply

The lead should be right.

reply

Well if a film is too violent they risk the dreaded NC-17 rating which is usually box office poison, so theatrical releases usually reel it in enough not to get worse than an R.

I guess it depends why the filmmakers decided to use extreme violence. If it's something like The Passion of the Christ or Schindler's List, the extremism may be justified to accurately portray the horrors of the story they are telling. If it's something like Human Centipede 2 that was simply trying to shock, it feels less justifiable. I don't want to say they're crossing a line because I'm a firm believer that if someone doesn't like something they should simply choose not to watch.

reply

I watched Passion of the Christ in a theater when it first came out. A lot of people including me walked out after 20 minutes. Mel Gibson really crossed the line.

reply

Others would think the movie is a masterpiece (I fall in neither camp). The movie wasn't to your personal taste but would you actually support it being banned from being shown?

Unless by crossed the line you meant you found the film to be anti-Semitic which I've heard it criticized for. But the topic of this thread is violence so I assume you're talking about that.

reply

Should Schindler's List be banned for being pro-Semitic?

reply

Should Schindler's List be banned for being pro-Semitic?


A) I didn't say anything should be banned.

B) Why would something be banned for being pro-Semitic?

reply

No I would never have it banned. Different strokes for different folks, and it definitely was not to my personal taste. Yes, I was referring to the violence only.

reply

It's been mentioned above and I agree with the fire extinguisher scene from Irreversible. Anything that harms animals as well as seen in Cannibal Holocaust (1980).

reply

Irreversible.
By the time I got to the Fire Extinguisher scene, I was like, YEAH! Kill that fucker bash his fuckin brains in, do it, do it do it. And that's out of character for me. The real horror for me was the utterly ruthlessly brutal rape scene that went on for what seemed like 45 minutes.
The movie manipulated me to become a violent person for the duration of the film. That's not a small thing.

reply

I felt that way when I first saw I Spit on Your Grave years ago. Seems tame in comparison nowadays though. Yep there's a few films that can pull you in and have you foaming at the mouth for retribution.

reply

The original "The Last House on the Left" had me that way.

reply

I was impressed by how real it looked despite the fact that it was all done digitally.

reply

Agreed, It looked as real as it gets.

reply

Yeah, especially for 2001-2002 and obviously not a mega budget.

reply