MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Film Critics - a Useless Profession?

Film Critics - a Useless Profession?


Art is subjective to the eye of the beholder. Films are art, so is there any practical use for grading films? I would say sometimes yes in terms of strength of performances, oringinality, cinematography, and conveying mood. Many universally acclaimed films ride off the success of those elements. But in my view, the buck stops there. As to some of my reasons why...

Genre films can feature great storylines and concepts but be snobbishly treated by critics for not being "serious" enough in terms of acting or God knows what.

Horror films were known to receive particular scorn but captured fear and mood well and were therefore entertaining.

European art house fare often fails to garner audience and critical acclaim in English speaking countries, derided for being "slow" or featuring "stale" characters, despite the films being all about conveying mood and themes.

Then there are the critically acclaimed films such as Citizen Kane that fail to reasonate with many people now.

Most annoying of all to me are those critics and regular on line critics who deride films without much elaboration - that I can never figure out why they hate the films in the first place. Using terms such as dated or pretentious - how can art be pretentious? It's either conveying something or it's not in my view. Almost like saying an athlete is trying too hard to play sport. Leonard Maltin's brief capsule reviews come to mind here in regards to these types of vague criticisms.

So is there any point to "professional" film critics being turned to and their views being compiled into rankings and such? That a film should have to stand on their views or be degraded and forgotten?

reply

The best critic is yourself.The others are payed to say nice things about bad movies.

reply

There's so much to watch nowadays, at the cinema and on TV, that you need to narrow down your options. Critics can help you find films you will enjoy, and help you avoid films you will hate. Of course, you risk living in a cultural bubble where all of your choices are made for you, but a filter of some kind is necessary.

Tarkovsky said that people should write poetry to complement films, rather than reviews. That's a nice idea, but criticism is an ancient practice that isn't about to disappear. Put simply, it's useful.

reply

I give no weight to professional critics. Relics from a bygone era.

reply

Totally agree.

reply

they are a dime a dozen.


reply

Yes they are a dying breed... all what they've been doing all this time is mind controlling public, they have built certain standards and biases and films come through all those filters, the same thing does education in schools, it is already proven how schools manage to stifle the free thinking, creativity and imagination in children, just look at Imdb ratings, how many people grow up adopting the same stadards and patterns of thinking of all the critics, you look around and feel like there's less and less difference between critics and regular people ou there, all of them start to think and talk the same way. People say they think for themselves, sure but the pure mind control happens to the unconscious mind, it can be extremely subtle. Only in later age after Ive been doing extensive studies on this for years I started unlearning many many things, that were simply egoic nonsense, until I started seeing films with the eyes of a child again... in those first few years of life, my perceptions were purest, and all my own, and our stastes only reflect that. The way we see and think affects the way how we feel. Strangely enough, some of the most hated films became to be the most powerful to me. everything changed.

reply

Although I don't share the same views on education generally (depending on what type of education and where) I completely get what you're coming from.

reply

Pretty much, literally everyone is a film critic with the internet. The only thing giving professional critics any legitimacy is Rotten Tomatoes which is just a political platform now.

reply

I think the best you can do is find a critic that shares your taste.
If you must read or listen.

Personally I don't listen to critics. I also don't look at ratings much other than wondering why is this movie
rated so high or low. It won't influence my decision on what I watch.

There are a few people who I will listen to if they say I should watch something.
This comes with time and knowing other people's taste.

After I stopped listening to critics many years ago my movie viewing experience has gotten better.
I don't watch nearly as many movies I don't like anymore.

reply

I find them useful
Some sites are pretty obvious hacks that are used to promote films (especially true of smaller horror/thriller indies) but overall i really enjoy lots of critical sites

I learn a lot about directorial choices, lighting methods, DVD image quality and more from critics

Ill make my own opinions but i DO find some critics helpful and interesting

I read the critics all the time

reply

Yeah. I put those types of critics that help make clear a film's style and themes in a different category, more like film theorists, although they often overlap with plain critics.
A critical review can be deeply analytical and beneficial, or just be a plain review with vague terms thrown up without much elaboration - all with an emphasis on trying to sway public taste and succeeding sometimes.

reply

It's their job to say a movie's bad, so YOU know it must be good!

In all honesty though, Mark Kermode is a pretty good film critic.

reply