MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Rate It: Underworld (2003)

Rate It: Underworld (2003)

posted 7 years ago by [deleted]
5 replies | jump to latest

For me, 4/10.

Aside from some neat visuals, Kate Beckinsale's performance, and Kate Beckinsale in tight leather, there's not much to recommend here on any front. Dull, expository-heavy storytelling. Weak, uninspired action scenes that are barely there. Lifeless, unconvincing romance between the two leads. And just a whole ensemble of flat, forgettable characters onscreen aside from Selene and Bill Nighy's character. So yeah, pretty lame.

Discuss...

[–] yesanything (251) 7 years ago

pretty sure I've seen it, but can't remember a single thing about it.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

I'm with you. But all I remembered was I enjoyed it enough to watch the second one. Felicity's boyfriend was in it?

[–] MovieManCin2 (26342) 7 years ago

7.0 on IMDB, 31% Rotten Tomatoes, and a paltry ** from the late, great Roger Ebert. I never saw this flick, and now
I know why.

😎

[–] croft_alice (12180) 7 years ago

I've seen all of them...the worst is blood wars...the same cliche,no story...it just me or is very similar with resident evil🤔

[–] TexasJack (12516) 7 years ago

I pretty much agree but I would give it 5/10 so I guess I liked it a little better.