Is a movie ever “just” a movie?
“You’re overthinking this, it’s only a movie.”
We’ve all heard this one (and probably said it a few times too).
A film should carry some sort of idea, even a most basic one IMO. People make movies because they want to convey something to the audience.
Sure, some sway more to the intellectual side, others more to entertainment. You can say that the ideas aren’t that interesting, or aren’t developed well. You can even say that you don’t watch them for anything else, but unplugging your brain for two hours.
But I don’t understand the continuous use of the “it’s only a movie” argument. Is it unwillingness to go a little deeper in what you’ve seen? Or an idea that certain movies are just for fun and there isn’t or shouldn’t be anything more there?
Not everything warrants deep analysis, or has grand themes, but I think it’s insulting to the filmmakers to say that there isn’t more to explore in their movies beyond the literal action on screen.
What are your guys’ thought on this? Why do people say that? Do you think it’s true? Can you give some examples of where it applies (something different than Transformers would be welcomed ;P)?