MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Sub-urban Myth?

Sub-urban Myth?


A friend was walking through a well known grocery store when he took note of a woman in her late 30's wearing black leather pants. Apparently, she had the body to pull it off looking flattering in them. This friend has never been married but has been looking to settle down and now has decided he wants a woman who would periodically wear such items of clothing but not as a priority over more important things such as basic love. I told him not to get too obsessed with the idea as the woman who wants to wear such clothing on a very regular basis usually is not looking to settle down with "regular guys"." It seems to be either a woman is still in her party phase and not looking to settle down or she is playing for high stakes i.e. a very financially successful guy. I have known and know quite a few people in my life and I do not know the lady who is age 30, 35, 40 or older who frequently wears black leather pants and is content to be the wife of an average Joe which includes having a job, cooking, cleaning, and running errands. Plus she does not have an eye on other guys. I am not saying that the perfect woman in that context does not exist but she is pretty darn hard to find and is not worth putting off 5,10, 15 years or more of a relationship that might be very satisfying in a lot of respects to satisfy a whim. I don't think that I have ever knowingly come in contact with such a woman in my life's travels.

reply

Depends. What kind of clothing your friend usually wear? Women with bold taste in fashion usually want men with a sense of fashion too. So if your friend is also a fashion-forward person I think he should make a move. If not, don't bother.

reply

My friend wears basic work type clothes. What he would wear to snare such a woman I do not know and feel a little uncomfortable asking about that. I don't know that if he was not willing to wear leather pants for instance that it would preclude a woman from being interested. Used to be if you wore such clothes you were seeking a like minded mate but I question how true that is today. Further, there are probably degrees of indulgence in terms of wearing something such as leather. A woman might just own the black leather pants you see her wearing or she might have several thousand dollars worth of leather in her closet. That is the conundrum a lot of times is that a guy does not get to see the intrigue while he is making his pitch.

reply

You should not take this one small detail and define a person's whole personality around it.
It's just a pair of pants. She probably does not wear them every day, might not wear leather every day. She probably does not define herself by a leather fetish. Leather pants are fairly mainstream these days as a fashion item, as well as many many styles of faux leather pants for those who can't afford the real thing or who don't like to kill animals.
The next day she might wear a frilly dress if she was in that mood, and if you saw her that day, you'd be making up a whole different fictional storyline about her.

Rarely is a person so fixated on a single item of clothing that they would only date someone who wears the same clothing. especially a person 30 years and up- by that age they should have learned that relationships are much more complicated than matching outfits.
If you have to change your whole wardrobe to get a date with someone then that is probably not the person for you.
Why not just get to know a woman as a human being, and then after you're in a relationship, you can buy her a pair of leather pants as a gift and she might wear them once in a while.

reply

VERY well said

reply

I don't think that anybody is trying to extensively predict a person's emotional makeup from one item of clothing. At the same time as you hinted with your statement that leather pants are fairly mainstream these days which is to say not that long ago they were not. That a person who wore them back during the 1980's tended to be unconventional to a certain degree.

You are right in that she may have chose those pants for that errand and may have wore something different the following day. I don't see that anybody is making up any story such as she dropped her pants while in the soap and detergent aisle and proceeded to have sex. The only thing that was noted about her was the leather pants, a guess as to her age, and that she was in a grocery store.

I question that people are not hung up over the clothing choices of mates and potential mates. Otherwise I don't think that we would see people wear clothing that is either unpractical and/or uncomfortable like we do. You can't tell me that wearing 3 inch plus heels for several hours is comfortable for most women. That wearing jeans so tight that you can not bend over in them plus have a rub mark on your skin from the button is practical or comfortable.

I agree with your last statement in that you should get to know a person and if you have to make great changes to please that person that in the end you will be unhappy. As far as buying her the leather pants that usually is less than a 50-50 proposition that she will accept. Might want to do that deep in the relationship before she slides on the ring if it's that important.

reply

"Might want to do that deep in the relationship before she slides on the ring if it's that important."

Are you seriously saying that someone's choice of what pants they wear is going to be a deal breaker for whether or not you marry them?
If it is that important to you, like so important that you wouldn't marry someone you otherwise loved and who loved you, just because they won't wear the freakin pants, then that is a fetish and you should just go to fetish clubs to find someone into the same thing. Nothing wrong with that. However, basing your entire relationship on a single fetish is pretty stupid because there is so much more to making a relationship work. Even couples heavy into fetish scenes still have to get along in the normal ways that vanilla people do.

reply

Getting to the heart of the matter as just said in the other post there probably is a fetish element to all this. Right now you are heaping a bunch of guilt on my friend but who is to say that the woman in question or any other woman does not have a fetish desire that needs to be satisfied. Would the weirdness magically go away if the requirement was liking the same NFL team or camping during the summer time? Is not in this case the desire to wear leather a compatibility test?

I would hope that even a fetish couple would have a long list of non-fetish issues that they would compatibility test for. Yes, I would imagine that even if they both wore leather pants around the clock that would not be enough to maintain a relationship long term when the other problems set in.

reply

Nope, there is no guilt for your imaginary friend. I think you should own your kinks and go about this in a more healthy way.
I'm only saying that leather pants are so mainstream now that you can no longer use it as a clue to someone's fetish. Rock & roll, punk rock, goth, and even high fashion have adopted many of the previously fetishized clothing and accessories. It used to be that a leather collar with a ring was a clue that someone was into BDSM, but now they sell them in Hot Topic and I see them in youtube fashion hauls by completely vanilla teenagers.

reply

Let me ask if you were in my friend's position would you make a change to seal the deal? If I were in his shoes I would make a fashion shift but even while wearing leather it would have to conform to my sense of taste. Basically, leather pants would have to conform to the style of traditional jeans or dress pants to get me to move.

reply

aren't leather pants too hot for this time of the year? most women now are wearing short shorts

reply

I doubt a person would lay on a lounge outside that way but to run from air conditioned office to air conditioned car to air conditioned store then back to air conditioned car then go home to central air conditioning would be no tough task.

reply

so she keeps her car running all the time?

reply

Seriously!? I could understand if this was 1970 and it took 5 minutes for the AC to start to take effect. A properly maintained modern vehicle blows cold within a minute so no the car is not running all hours of the day.

reply

and you know that she drives "A properly maintained modern vehicle"? or is that another assumption?

reply

I think that is a reasonable assumption. Are you assuming that she is driving a poor condition 1978 Ford Pinto or 1978 Chevy Chevette? What are your assumptions?

I see no harm in making reasonable assumptions. That she has a decent job for the area to pay for some fashionable clothes. Should I assume that she gets 30 hours at Walmart and stole the leather pants from the mall store? That she is the madame of an "escort" business and that the leather pants are a form of advertising? I think my assumptions are reasonable for the area that I live in but where you live things most likely skew different.

reply

so you see no harm in making reasonable assumptions?
to quote you "I am making virtually no assumptions." and yet you assume things are "different" where I live, among so many other things, do you forget what you lie about? Biff, you're digging a hole that you can't seem to get out of,


reply

There is not a shovel large enough to dig you out of the hole you made ASSUMING that I saw some Steve Martin movie which I did not. And I am making virtually no assumptions but establishing probabilities based on where I live. I never attempted to speculate as to the make and model of the woman's vehicle nor what career she was specifically engaged in nor what neighborhood she lived in and so forth.

The designated geographic population where I live statistically is less than 1 percent of the total for the United States assuming that you live in the US. So it is 99 percent probable that you live outside of my area and have a different complement of small businesses and so forth.

reply

Honestly, it is though you a re reacting with jealousy to what I have said about the encounter. That you should have been the one confronted with opportunity when it came up instead of for my friend. If you want a woman who dresses "up" why not just go for it. Guys buy stuff for their wives and girlfriends quite a bit that they would not want their mother or mother-in-law to see. If it is a big deal it should be talked about early in the relationship just as you would if you were a big NFL fan and made it clear that nine plus hours (3 games) on Sunday are yours and will not do anything else during that time but the significant other is welcome to join in. Or that the woman goes to her parents house Saturday evenings for dinner and expects who ever she hooks up with be willing to go with her.

reply

umm, I'm not actually jealous, I'm just laughing at your stupid friend with no balls for not going up to the girl of his dreams with the hot black pants when he had the chance,
Now, don't take that personally, I'm talking about your dumb ass friend.

reply

It's not like my friend has no one to ask out or that was his only chance at a woman in his entire life. She was evidently something different than what he normally comes across. The emotion you put into your reply tells me that maybe this was YOUR only chance at such a woman. Once again you give yourself away.

reply

god that is what I was thinking too, it's over 90 here today and I don't want to wear ANY pants, much less leather ones!
all I can think is SWAMP ASS

reply

Where I am at in the Northeastern US it is in the low 70's right now.

reply

Which grocery store was it?

reply

I'd rather not say although it is well known in my area it would kind of give away the area I live in and I prefer not to do that.

reply

Understandable but it does help try and pin a demographic on her if we know where she shops and what she was buying.

Just trying to help.

reply

I have no idea of what she was buying. The area I live in would be considered interior Northeast USA and average income for somebody with some college education would be 12-15 dollars per hour. If I had to guess she would probably make 15 dollars per hour maybe working over at the hospital or the local college. Enough to have a decent apartment or small house plus car plus a little cash for fashion.

reply

If she works in the hospital or college as you seem to think then she may be a vocational person who has a lot of time for people in need. This could work in your friends favour depending upon how needy he is.

Of course she might just work in administration in which case there's no way of knowing her motivations because for some it's simply a means to cash for living and for others its a path to an ambition within management (There are plenty of other motivations too but I'm keeping it concise).

I say you have your friend have a go at asking her out next time he sees her. Make sure he's himself though and not pretending to be anyone else - hard to maintain and any lies told will be found out.

reply

If his luck is like mine he will probably not see her again. I have been guilty of waiting and thinking while opportunity slips away.

reply

I've always been of the opinion that what is for you won't go by you.

Good and bad.

reply

Probably true in the end whether we get to see it before we pass on. Also, for the purpose of the topic there is the difference between a relationship and an arrangement. I've known enough people over the years that there is no doubt couples who have an arrangement where the husband earns the big bucks and the wife does her best to look hot. I am sure if I got to check the closets of some of those wives there is no doubt some very interesting outfits inside. But we are talking about having a relationship where as we age we are not obsessed with our physical shortcomings. What does the couple do when the husband's company closes up and his six figure income goes away? What does the wife do when she wakes up some morning that she can not keep herself at a size 6 or no longer looks late 20's but 50-ish?

reply

That's just life Biff, don't let that get in the way of a good thing ;)

reply

People, you are overthinking it. It is no different from a muscular guy who wears clothes that show off his muscles. Such people tend to be insecure about themselves and the showing is just that - showing. Or maybe this is her way to attract attention of men. Generally it is a bad idea for a woman to attract a man with her ass, as it happened with your friend. Doesn't mean that she is a wench. People are complex. You can't tell shit about them by considering their pants.

reply

Yes, people are complex. We don't know the point of going out dressed that way or that it signifies anything in particular for the wearer. The wearer may just consider wearing leather pants for mundane activities nothing taboo and may be unaware that not many years ago that they were a non conventional clothing choice for most people. Nobody is saying that she was trashy.
The main point of the thread is that men do react to how women dress and find a woman who is dressed "brazenly" attractive. Further, that the uncommon nature to wear leather pants to go grocery shopping might mean that the woman is bold in other respects. That to find a woman who is willing to be bold in some respects but be mundane in other respects such as cooking and running a household is not somewhat rare but very rare. Willing in that it is her choice to do so and is not co-eirced into doing because of force or financial enticement. I would hope that a guy's main consideration for a marriage partner would not be for a how boldly a woman may dress. But if it is that important that the matter is addressed early on so as not to make two lives miserable if they do not see eye to eye on such things

reply

Can't say much about that. I'm not interested in what housewife the female of interest could be. Maybe this is just me being a weirdo.

It could be that she is a hard rock fan or something. Leather clothes always seemed so old fashioned to me, but I'm too unfashionable to claim such things.

Women are hardwired for family. If everything is going fine in their private life, few would be "bold ones" - leather pants or no pants at all. And I can't even see anything bold about wearing leather pants.

Your fellow is sexually attracted, it looks to me. At his age he should be smarter than that and also know not to mess with girls who he can't trust 100%. As a paranoid person, I will tell you that the only person, apart from one's mother, who can be 100% trustworthy is the person with which the one is in love and then pants don't matter.

reply

You are attributing a lot of weird assumptions and baggage onto a simple pair of pants.

- You immediately assume she wears them 'frequently' when you've only seen her one time. (or your friend has)
- You assume she's a party girl or gold digger and would not hold a job or run errands, but she must have had a job to pay for her pants and her groceries.
- And isn't going grocery shopping an errand? She's in the store shopping for food to cook.
- she might already be married or in a relationship, not "hunting" for some rich dude.
- she might be a lesbian.
- She might just be fashionable, not fetishy or a gold digger or anything else. Just likes fashion.
- she might ride a motorcycle. leather pants are a functional item in that context, not a fashion item.
- They might not even be real leather, they could be pleather and those can be quite inexpensive.

reply

I am making virtually no assumptions. I only assumed that a fair number of women in general most likely were not into a long term relationship that may wear leather pants. I never said that she was hunting for a guy while in the store. The fact that women dress bold compared to a generation ago might just be a reflection of what they see on television where female characters wear such clothes but are not pondering any immediate sexual activity.

I never said that she did not have a job and did assume she may have one considerably above minimum wage which would allow for some fashionable clothing.

I don't think that my friend would have given her a second thought if she was wearing an engagement ring or wedding band.

Nobody said ANYTHING about being a lesbian.

A large part of the discussion is whether she is being fashionable or sexual by wearing the pants

I was not there but I don't think that these were "practical" bike riding pants.

My friend is sharp enough to know real leather and if they were pleather they would have been of a high quality to fool him.

reply

you said:
"I do not know the lady who is age 30, 35, 40 or older who frequently wears black leather pants and is content to be the wife of an average Joe which includes having a job, cooking, cleaning, and running errands."

you said that a woman her age wearing leather pants would not do "wifey" things including having a job and running errands.
I am saying that you need to have a job to buy things like expensive pants and groceries, and going out to buy groceries IS running an errand, by definition.

And can we please just drop this "my friend" pretense. It was obviously you who saw the woman, and it's you who is making all these bizarre fictional storylines about someone based on one pair of pants.

If I see someone wearing leather pants in mid June, the only thing I assume about them is "boy their ass must be sweaty right now".

reply

There is a difference between doing something for yourself and doing something for someone else or others. Unless you can afford delivered food three times a day for seven days a week then you have to go to the store. I would say extremely few people where I live could afford to be catered to all the time. Also, again I would point out that I presumed that this person has a job and probably a good one.

It was my friend after all and I am sorry that you are offended by it. When I go to the store I tend to see average women in average clothing. The lady I seem to see almost always every week is (in my opinion) in her early 60's and has two preschool grandchildren with her.

My curiosity is peaked about this because we are talking about a fetish most likely and kind of wondered how couples sort their way through that.

reply

There are two ways that people go about exercising their fetish with another person.

1. They specifically seek out people that have that same fetish, either through clubs or personal ads/dating services, etc, and they use the fetish to find people that already have the same fetish. Then they still have to do all the 'normal' relationship work everyone has to do, to determine compatibility in other areas.
i.e. start with the fetish, and then expand to the other 99% of life.

2. They find a partner through the usual vanilla channels, or they already have a partner. they do all the 'normal' compatibility work first. And then they introduce their fetish to the vanilla partner. You are assuming that every vanilla person would reject a partner who disclosed a fetish. This is a false assumption. It really depends on what the fetish is. Many are harmless enough that even someone who isn't personally into it might still go along with it to please someone they love, as long as it isn't too offensive to them.
For example: It might be pretty hard to get someone without a piss fetish to let you piss on them. That would be a hard one to sell. Most people without a piss fetish will try very hard to avoid coming in contact with piss.
But just wearing certain items of clothing that are fairly mainstream these days as fashion, would not be a hard sell. It doesn't hurt to wear them (unless it's mid june and 95 degrees like today!), so even if it does not give the woman the same erotic pleasure, she very well might agree to wear it IF a loving relationship had already been established first. people who care about each other will do things to please each other.
to be cont


Note: I have put the word normal in quotes because I do not think fetishes are bad or abnormal, what I mean by "normal" is the usual conventional vanilla way of relationships and courtship.

reply

Continued.
It also depends how your "friend" broaches the subject with his partner.
he should not bring it up in the creepy way you have presented it here, that would likely result in the answer being NO.
But if 'he' introduced it in a complimentary way, like you (as a couple) see someone on TV wearing leather pants and you say " You would look great in that outfit, you have the great body for it", the reaction could be positive. Also, and this is KEY, if you are asking someone who does not have a particular fetish to do something just to please you, you should also offer to do something that pleases them (even if it's not really something you get off on). Not every thing has to be mutual all the time, but the non mutual things should be balanced out so that both people get what they want at some point.
If you do introduce the fetish to someone you already love and they love you, and your partner says no they don't want to do it, I cannot imagine you would seriously throw away the relationship just for this one thing. If the fetish is that overpoweringly important, more important than any other part of the relationship, then you should definitely use method 1.

The problem with this random grocery store woman, is that there is no evidence she shares the fetish OR that she has anything else compatible with your 'friend'.
if 'he' asked her out and she declined, you would immediately attribute that to the pants because you are obsessed with the pants. But she might be declining because she is already in a relationship (she can have a boyfriend OR a girlfriend without being married or engaged), or because she just does not want to be in a relationship right now, or because you just aren't her type. People are complex and there is more to them than just what pants they decided to wear that day.

reply

My friend did not follow this woman around but rather just walked by and the visual sighting lasted less than 10 seconds. And no in that if his eyes were laser beams that he would have burned a hole into her pants.

I agree with you in bringing up the subject in a positive way or that will be a compliment. Yes, there will be the element of this for that in that if you want something you need to offer something as well. I would not think that somebody would throw away a relationship over not embracing something such as a fetish but you have to wonder when the couple divorce and he or she is with a new partner who embraces it. In one instance I know of it was the wife who tossed aside the husband because she wanted to embrace something and he would not go along with it.

You are right in that we don't know the grocery store woman's desires or kinks if she has any. But I would say the encounter was unusual enough for where I live that a guy has to think about it.

reply

1. Clubs and services may work in the major cities but I know from a co-worker from several years ago that it is nearly impossible to readily find someone in a medium or small city never mind being further out. I already figured if somebody has a serious fetish desire that they get that out of the way early on just like an NFL fan lets his (or her) potential partner know what he/she will be doing for 16 Sundays each fall along with the playoffs and if you are really a fanatic then the draft and training camp.

2. Getting your mate to wear certain items of clothing may be easy peasy in your circle but I have seen that be a stumbling block in a number of relationships. If I had to guess at the success rate of introducing minor fetishes into a relationship I would guess it would have to be around 35-40 percent. As stated in my other post I can get my wife to go along with anything that I may be interested in and I have no interest in the extremes such as being pissed on or pissing on somewhat else. No nipple clamps, electric shock, etc..

reply

"If I had to guess at the success rate of introducing minor fetishes into a relationship I would guess it would have to be around 35-40 percent."

And that guess is an assumption based on no actual experience or evidence.
You never know until you ask.
Even if the answer is no, you are no worse off than you were before you asked.

I mean your "friend" is no worse off.

reply

And your assumption that I know absolutely no one to in turn draw conclusions about relationships is completely false in its nature. I knew the couple mentioned previously where the wife ended the relationship. A good friend of my wife would be willing to engage in some kink to get her husband to pay more attention to her. I know of a couple where the husband did buy the wife some leather and she basically threw it back at him without explanation. I had a boss many years ago whose wife was too "straight and innocent" for his liking so he cheated with a number of female employees who all seemed to be desperate for their jobs. At the same company I had a female co-worker go into way too much detail as to what her ideal love life should be like.

By the way I did not introduce the topic because I was lost as how to advise a friend. I just thought it was something seldom discussed here and broke up the routine of bashing celebrities and politicians.

reply

Biffgg says, and I quote, "I am making virtually no assumptions" then says, and I quote "I only assumed that a fair number of women in general.........." it's the same thing Biff, this is a funny story, I saw the same scene in the movie "My Blue Heaven" with Steve Martin, he meets a girl in a super market wearing tight leather pants by the frozen foods, and says to her, "you shouldn't be next to the frozen foods, you're going to melt all this stuff" then they leave together, good movie, Biff, you would make a writer, a bad one, but still a writer, there is no FRIEND, I doubt there is even a girl in leather pants, and you know way too much and assume too much for not being there,
"I was not there but I don't think that these were "practical" bike riding pants." that line doesn't even make sense.


reply

I am making very few assumptions. Your telling me you never make assumptions about the people you meet in public places. I am sorry that your senses are offended by what I have said. There is a friend and it was his description of spotting a woman in a grocery store. That is why I know anything about her existence. If you know a friend for quite a long time then you get a sense of what they may know and do not know. If they were motorcycle type pants my friend is worldly enough to pick up on that. By the way I never saw or heard of My Blue Heaven until now. Are you going to accuse me of lying about that based on the ASSUMPTION that because you know of that movie then I must therefore know about it as well.

reply

I always make assumptions about the people I meet in public places, but I don't deny it, like you did, and this isn't about me, it's about you and your imaginary friend and the hooker in the tight leather pants.
so your worldly friend told you they weren't motorcycle type pants?

reply

Your flailing about desperately now. I never said that the woman in question was a hooker. My friend described what he saw well enough to know. If he thought he saw riding pants he would have thought that maybe she was a biker chick and have said so.

reply

How do you know she wasn't a hooker? oh, I forgot, you live in Salt Lake City.

reply

LOL I know right?
He wasn't there, but he knows that were not motorcycle pants or faux leather, he knows for a fact they were real leather because his 'friend" is such an expert on leather pants...
come on Biff just tell the truth. You got a thing for leather. Nothing wrong with that! Own your kinks!

reply

I don't need to create a personality out of thin air because I don't have the balls to speak to my wife about my desires. All the kink that she or I have is out in the open between us. I know the line that she will not cross and after that she only asks that I don't spend money on the bedroom ahead of other things in the monthly budget. By the way I did not know that identifying the type of leather pants a person may wear is akin to rocket science as you seem to think. By the way my friend is not clueless.

I can only think that your attacks are a show of your own inadequacy and that you wish that you were in my friend's position.

reply

"I can only think that your attacks are a show of your own inadequacy and that you wish that you were in my friend's position."

What?
You think I wish I was in a grocery store staring at a strangers pants and never meeting or talking to the stranger?
Why would anyone want to be in that position? What is enviable about that kind of position?
No one is attacking you dude, but many people in this thread believe there is no friend.

reply

People can choose to believe what they want to believe. You may not want to check out a woman in leather pants at a store but there are many guys that would. There are a lot of guys who lack confidence in themselves because of the way that they look. Nobody is saying that is enviable but just reality. Further, many guys and women often want better than what they currently have.

reply

First you say I'm jealous of your 'friend', then you say he has no confidence because he's unattractive.
Can you understand now why none of this makes sense?

reply

I never said that he was unattractive. My statement about guys lacking confidence is a general one. Don't read things into statements that are not there. Also, just because it makes no sense to you does not mean that it does not to a great number of others. I still think that you have some envy issue otherwise you would not be putting so much energy into tearing down what I said.

reply

Who am I envious of exactly?

reply

Denial is a poor substitute for addressing a problem. You would have not gone this far on this topic if something was not bothering you. Quite a few of the other posters put in their two cents yesterday and left it at that. You need to see my friend as imaginary so you do not need to see him as someone similar to yourself.

reply

Biff, I commend you, you are one of the great spinners of all time,

reply

I need to spin nothing. As the saying goes the most simplest explanation is often the most likely one. The fact that you will not let go of this tells me that I hit a nerve. I would hope that there is quite a bit more to your life than hoping to date what would be for you a woman out of the ordinary. Most guys just date and marry what they can get and there is no shame in that as it should be about love primarily.

reply

I won't let it go? tell ya what, I'll let it go if you let it go by not replying to anyone anymore, deal or no deal? a simple yes or no, without a spin, which I doubt!!!

reply

No, you won't let it go. Further, my thread so I will respond as I see fit. I will make a deal that if you make no more posts on this thread I will not keep calling you out. I don't see the problem anyways as no guy here is going out with or married to a super model so there is no need for you to keep picking away at this. Something happened to someone and I thought that might be more interesting than the normal tripe here but I guess not.

reply

Why keep replying to a topic you do not care for at all? If I do not care for a topic I do not bother contributing to it. See how simple it is. I guess you are busy at the moment. Probably downloading pics of women in black leather. No harm in that. Carry on.

reply

Why doesnt he simply ask his curent girlfriend to dress this way for him as a treat a few times... logic?

reply

He is not in a relationship right now. I don't want to say his age (not old) but he spent a lot of his younger days not being serious about things including relationships. Most of the places he goes women pretty much dress the same way with jeans and denim jackets and athletic shoes.

reply

Well... after he actually gets into a relationship he and his girlfriend can dress up however pleases one another...

It's trivial

reply

If you don't wear leather it is one of those things people can have a mental block about even if it is faux leather. When I was school age I would have never wore leather. I believed the worst stereotypes about wearing leather. When I got to know people I considered "normal" then I was open to wearing a jacket or pants.

reply

It depends on the person; where I am -- and it's just a typical city -- there's an area where a certain group of people, largely women, dress like they're going out for a special evening just to go grocery shopping. they aren't hookers or golddiggers; just regular people. I've seen leather pants/skirts, "FM" high heels, tons of jewelry, silk blouses/dresses, slit skirts, you name it. Why? No clue. Not like the supermarkets in the area are frequented by rich folks.

reply

You kind of get the point in that women may be dressing as though they are going out for a special evening just when they are doing mundane things such as shopping for food. Back a generation ago quite a few women did not go through such effort for the grocery store. It's not a rich area where this happened. Just a shift in attitude in fashion sense from what we saw a generation or two ago.

reply

Not back a generation ago...most people, men and women. do not dress up to go food shopping.

reply

That is what I meant when I said "go through such effort." But that kind of takes back to discussing what is "everyday" clothing-wise for a person in 2017 versus 1987 or 1997 for instance. Back a few decades ago it was jeans or slacks for pants for everybody when they went to the store but how different is today. In fifty or one hundred years from now will they all wear synthetic unitards like we see in so many SF movies.

reply

I don't think the leather pants alone are "brazen". What did her top look like? Leather pants can be very classy. Also, who is to say she wasn't going somewhere special after shopping, or coming from somewhere special before going shopping? I saw women dressed nicely in the store yesterday and assumed they had just come from church. Maybe she had just been on a date or something.

I would say, too, that sometimes dress does not indicate riskiness. Some of the brazenly dressed women can be boring while women who dress in a classy outfits might be more exciting. The old saw "don't judge a book by its cover" comes to mind. You can't really tell these things by clothes.

The only way your friend can possibly find out if she is interested in dating him is if he approaches her and asks her out for a date.

reply

I agree with a majority of what you said. I've seen younger women at Catholic Church Mass wearing leather pants and long skirts that were very tastefully tailored. I don't think that they were trying to be sexual but just reflecting what they see through the media and their social circle.

reply

I think sometimes men and women have different interpretations about clothes. What a woman may think is not overtly sexual, a man may see as sexual. That's why it's always the father who tells his daughter "You're not leaving the house looking like that!". It's never the mother telling the daughter this, because we see things differently.

Sometimes, too, a woman will dress up on purpose just to make herself feel good. I don't know if men are aware of this, but sometimes, even if a woman has nowhere to go- she'll just dress up to feel confident.

reply

In my in-laws house my MIL was the enforcer when it came to rules. One time two of my SIL's slipped out of the house wearing.....leather pants to go clubbing W/O permission. The younger one should have NOT been out clubbing and no doubt had a fake ID. The more interesting story concerning my MIL was a bunch of kids were picking on my future BIL and to make the problem go away she sent him out to fight one of the kids and made it clear to the group nobody was to help the one chosen to fight for them or she would call the cops. My BIL while not the sharpest was a big kid so he beat his opponent and that was the last of the group bothering him.

reply

The world has changed very much since then. Nowadays, if that happened, your mother in law might have been arrested for abetting juvenile delinquency. I found out something recently that was enlightening. I teach school, and I overheard two students talking about fights. One said that the reason why students pick fights at school rather than in the neighborhood, is because the kids know an adult will always step in and break up the fight. If they fight in the neighborhood, it might get out of hand as deep down, they really don't want to hurt another person. It made me think differently about kids fighting.

reply

This episode happened around midday. Doubtful that this woman was going to or from a date but possible in today's 24/7 world. I would guess that she was dressed fairly classy in general. I can't imagine a woman going into the local grocery dressed like she came from a fetish catalog photo shoot.

reply

Well, you never know. If it was midday, she could have been coming from a lunch date.

It is all speculation. I think your friend needs to do the following: go back to the store on Mondays about midday and see if he can see her again. If he does, he should approach her and ask her out on a date.

I was in the grocery store once in a dress and heels. I just gotten off of work and had to pick up a few things. A guy approached me and asked if I knew how to cook yellow rice and could I come home and show him. I was flattered, of course. But I thought him asking me to his house was a little too forward. Your friend should ask her if he can take her out for a cup of coffee.

I hope he us successful.

reply

Yeah, I hope you would not go home with somebody you did not know. Some stores now have a cafe inside the premises and that would be the best starting point.

reply

I would suggest he try to go there, then and see if he runs into her again. He should probably wear something nice, I don't mean be fake- but not dress like a slob.

reply

He is in there three to four times per week as it is. If it is meant to be then he will come across her again.

reply

And tell him to abstain from Amish remarks about her pants. Being open minded is not against anybody's religion.

reply

I don't think this guy is thinking about laying Amish guilt concerning modesty on her. I don't just why she captured his imagination and as said he could probably find another woman and buy leather pants as a gift to her when the time is appropriate. This is not directed at you but I will comment that some of the most attractive women I have seen get looks because of the positive attitude they exhibit even if it is just a smile. Women who have it all physically often are not approachable.

reply

Some supermarkets have singles nights don't they? The idea being you go there and meet someone.
Maybe that's what you saw? Otherwise its quite strange!

reply

I am unaware of any area markets having single's nights but it has been common for quite some time that younger single people do their shopping later in the day presumably after work. It's quite common to hear someone say how they met someone while shopping. A lot of people do not feel comfortable at bars anymore and I know somebody who works in the ER of the local hospital and it is not uncommon for guys to show up that suffered some injury from a bar fight.

I know I did not say it in the original post but subsequent posts that this happened around midday. While unusual it may not be strange if everything was known about the episode. I am middle-aged so what might seem out of the ordinary for me may not be unusual at all for somebody ten or fifteen years younger than myself. I just thought this might be interesting to people and provide a break from bashing politicians and movie stars.

reply

I think we all make spur of the moment assumptions about people based on first impressions.Unless we get to know them better we never find out if we were right or wrong.

For me leather trousers are just for people who ride motorbikes.

Perfectly practical safety measure if you ride a bike,mad idea if you're just wearing them to do your shopping! Hot,sweaty, smelly,uncomfortable and only flattering if you've a great figure.

I still wouldn't want to guess why your lady was doing her shopping in leather trousers.I guess she just likes them!

reply

maybe her pants were black cotton and his friend wears bifocals and just thought they were leather

reply

Your jealousy is getting more obvious.

reply

you're right, I wish I had bifocals

reply

You are just digging the hole deeper that says you got screwed out of an opportunity in your mind.

reply

awww, come on, I said the hole digging first, get your own material.

reply

Yeah, but you did not invent the expression.

reply

👍
this board needs a LIKE button

reply

I've encountered it several times in the middle of a weekday

reply

Nobody is disputing that you can meet someone in the middle of the day. A woman wearing leather pants at noon time in a grocery store wear I live is quite a bit less than common is the point.

reply

Or, maybe this woman found an old pair of leather pants in her closed, saw that they still fit, and decided to take them for a spin down at the supermarket, because she doesn't have anywhere else to wear them. Pants shouldn't be that complicated.

reply

Well, that is kind of leading back to fetish or no fetish just to wear leather pants for the sake of wearing leather pants? Given the community I don't know that if I were a woman that I would wear leather pants to a store where nobody else is wearing them. At least at that time of the day. It's all a matter of the community a person lives in and whether you can associate with like minded people. Now a person could go back to the same store at maybe 9:30 PM and have a different cliental roaming the aisles. Grocery stores in my area are known as a fairly safe way to meet other people so if I were a somewhat young woman maybe I would throw on a pair of leather pants knowing what the crowd is going to be at 9:30 PM. With the absence of alcohol and hard drugs I would not have to worry so much about being assaulted.

reply

that is kind of leading back to fetish or no fetish just to wear leather pants for the sake of wearing leather pants?


Fetish is what you got from my comment? Not "Oh, cool, these still fit!"...?

At times I don't understand this fascination men have with the meaning behind any item of clothing a woman has chosen to wear. Especially since you don't know this person's schedule. Sometimes pants are just pants. Or is this just your particular fetish? I don't mean this to be rude! I think you might be overthinking this one a tiny bit.

reply

I got your comment but I was kind of looking to the next step in all of this. That for instance if we could survey 100 women who own leather pants what their rational is for wearing them. Do they see any difference wearing that versus cotton pants in terms of social perception? You are definitely on to something when you note the significance of men being fascinated with clothing that they perceive as a sexual signal. Further, that we all come from different backgrounds. It may be very well that where you come from women wear leather pants to a degree where no significance can be found for what one given woman may be doing when she does wear such an item. That it may be no more than an expression of fashion.

reply

I'll bet if you ask a woman why she wears leather pants, and if it's sexual or not, she just might slap you silly.

reply

Or in my case she will tell me why. It's all in how you ask.

reply

Then do us all a favor. Ask her why and stop this endless amateur armchair analysis. And as others have said, it's so obvious your "friend" exists only in your imagination it's laughable.

reply

I don't know why a few people feel so threatened by the subjects in the topic that they need to dismiss both as imaginary. Yes, it is out of the ordinary for where I live but if I wanted to spin a story I could be far more bold and daring than I was. I guess that guys don't talk to their friends about interesting women that they meet out in public anymore. I guess this webspace was only meant to exist to comment about Kardasian's and Trump and Wonder Woman.

reply

Nobody is threatened, Biff. Trust me; NOBODY. It's just that you've talked this whole thing to death with completely theoretical what-ifs, could bes, maybes, fetish, non-fetish, golddiggers, etc., that serve zero purpose to answering the situation. Your imaginary friend saw a woman wearing leather pants in a supermarket and starts creating endless scenarios. There could be any number of reasons she was wearing leather pants. If you -- sorry, "he" -- are really interested in finding out about her, "he" needs to talk to her. End of story.

reply

This is essentially a talk site and aside from you and a couple other accounts which I presume are socks that people have some degree of interest. If they don't they are then free to move on.

reply

Nope, not a sock. You shouldn't make assumptions you have no way of backing up. And you're right; this IS a talk site, where everyone is free to express their opinions. Mine is that your friend is completely imaginary and that you've "discussed" this whole near-meaningless thing to death. You're free to respond, of course, but expect to get responses back.

So far, you've called people "threatened" and 'jealous" where there's been zero evidence of either. That sounds like someone who's just determined to keep on nattering.

Oh; and regarding, "I guess that guys don't talk to their friends about interesting women that they meet out in public anymore".... Your "friend" didn't meet her, according to your original tale. You -- sorry, "he" -- only saw her. Two quite different things.

reply

Actually we are all one, We are Borg.

reply

Have you been assimilated, bubba?

reply

Oh, good grief! Can we get back to the pine trees and squirrels?
Oops! My bad! That was the other informative thread! As an aside, I hope I don't lose sleep tonight wondering why a woman chose to wear leather pants to the grocery! Maybe she wasn't completely attired for her S & M party. IDK Who cares?😱

reply

Exactly. Who cares?

reply

So why keep posting if you do not care? If I don't like a thread I don't keep clicking on it to add replies.

reply

Why keep nattering when it's accomplishing nothing? As you said, we're free to do what we wish here.

reply

I think that I am accomplishing a great deal. I have obviously given you quite a bit to think about or you would have moved on from this thread yesterday. You are all worked up about this thread and yet can't see that you and your socks have the power to end it as nobody else is choosing to contribute and I am not going to endlessly reply to myself. To use corporate speak from 15 plus years ago "You are empowered."

reply

Wrong again, Einstein. I'm not worked up at all. And again, I have no socks, sorry, though if it somehow makes you feel better to pretend I do, go right ahead. You seem to half-live in fantasy anyway. I just pointed out that it's beyond obvious there is no friend, that you can't even keep your story straight, and that you've beat the subject to death.

reply

He keeps crying about how everyone is 'attacking' him, I'm drowning in his salty tears. And he keeps saying everyone should move on from this thread. But then he won't let anything just drop, he keeps bumping it up to argue.
smdh

reply

Probably the most attention he's ever gotten.

BTW, I --oops, I mean my buddy -- saw a woman today wearing a gold lame mini-skirt in the hardware store today. Do you think he has a chance with her, or that she's just going to hardware stores to find guys to do home projects for her? Should he wear a carpenter's apron next time he goes there in case she comes in again? Or maybe she's just a hooker. Or maybe she has a gold lame fetish....

reply

Was she buying a shovel, a tarp, and rope?
She probably just murdered the guy she picked up at the grocery store.

reply

Y'know,,,come to think of it, I think she was...I mean my friend thinks she was ...but maybe she has a shovel/tarp/rope fetish. The fact she was wearing gold lame, though...that says it all...doesn't it?

reply

I am just making an observation where as you are seriously worked up over this. Your reasoning makes no sense as this is my thread so naturally I am going to make replies to it. On the other hand you have no personal investment in the topic or so you say. Like I said before I am not going to endlessly reply to myself so when you stop barring a new poster then it ends and falls off page 1.

reply

Once again, you're the only one worked up, fantasy boy, and I'm not reasoning at all; I'm stating facts. And you can repeat what you said before; doesn't make you any less wrong about anyone being worked up or having socks here. But nice try. FAIL

reply

Why so emotional about a matter that you say you do not care the least about. Just stop responding and if nobody else chips in this thread will be off page one where it will not bother you any more.

reply

Again, not emotional at all. Why persist in responding when all you're doing is babbling? Some sort of OCD disorder?

reply

No one is emotional besides you. (why so invested for something that didn't even happen to you, allegedly)
You are the one crying because people 'attacked' you.
Everyone else is just laughing at the story.

reply

I'd say not just at the story, but the story-teller as well.

reply

Snarky responses only confirm that I am right. The rest of your post is self-denial nonsense.

reply

No, actually they don't, and you're not. But again, keep making stuff up...you obviously do that daily. Of, and you may want to look up what self-denial means. You obviously have no clue.

reply

Making stuff up? You are the one saying that nobody cares about this topic. Are you seriously trying to imply that you PM'd all the other contributors and they told you despite their responses that they do not care about the topic? Do you understand the meaning of none versus some versus all. Do you understand sets and subsets which was covered in elementary school math at least when I was in school? For the purpose of the topic of the group of women that wear leather pants that there is a subset that has an interest in fetishism. That there is a subset that wear leather pants as an expression of fashion. Which subset could the subject of the topic fall in is the question. But keep coming back with snarky responses that accomplish nothing along with the insults. You and your socks seem capable of little else.

reply

Yeah, you;re making stuff up. Third time: no socks. Are you incapable of understanding basic words, or are you partially illiterate? Or simply stupid?

"Are you seriously trying to imply that you PM'd all the other contributors and they told you despite their responses that they do not care about the topic?"

More making stuff up. Where the hell did you even dream that nonsense up? Almost as bad as your dragging fetish into the mix.

Your whole ridiculous and totally unrelated "analysis" of the subsets is more proof that you have some kind of disorder.

Insults? Hmmm...let's see. You accused several others of being desperate and jealous with zero basis in anything but your imagination.

Since you obviously didn't look it up, self-denial is when one denies what they themselves do or say...a good example is someone who creates an imaginary scenario involving an imaginary friend who happened to see a woman in leather pants once in a supermarket, then proceeds to obsess on her, bur lies -- sorry, denies -- any of it is true even though it's plainly obvious to everyone else.

reply

Now you are just putting on the exclamation mark onto your problems. You are the one saying that NOBODY cares about the topic and EVERYBODY thinks my friend is imaginary. How do you arrive at those conclusions? Or that it is obvious to EVERYONE else. Did you survey EVERYONE on this website? Can't you see that you are embarrassing yourself in a futile attempt to be the last man standing?

reply

Nope, not embarrassing myself at all. Shame you can't see how idiotic you're making yourself look by insisting your imaginary friend is real and blabbering about nonsense. The conclusions you've arrived at in this whole thread are laughingly inaccurate and ridiculous.

reply

Not that I really care nor have I changed my opinion that you are full of nonsense but how am I inaccurate? At least we could get back to discussing the topic instead of you flailing desperately to get the topic off of page 1 or so you claim you want it gone. But you throw aside every opportunity to do so by continually replying.

reply

Where, exactly, did I claim I want it gone? Please post where I said that? Making stuff up again.

How are you inaccurate? Let's see..

You stated I'm using socks. WRONG
You called several posters jealous. WRONG
You called several posters desperate. WRONG
You stated I was worked up. WRONG
First you claimed your imaginary friend saw the woman, they later said he met her. LIE
You said you're making no assumptions, then proceeded to make assumptions. LIE
You stated, "there probably is a fetish element to all this." ZERO BASIS IN FACT

Need more examples, fantasy boy?

reply

Resistance is futile.

reply

A little laxative will take care of that.

reply

I think you're the one who needs it. You need to flush the crap out of your system

reply