MovieChat Forums > Historical > 'King Arthur' or '10,000 BC' - which do ...

'King Arthur' or '10,000 BC' - which do you prefer?

posted 16 years ago by cengelm
8 replies | jump to latest

'King Arthur' or '10,000 BC' - which do you prefer?

For me it's 'King Arthur'

[–] cdull 16 years ago

Neither.

Joah

[–] Mhjm6 16 years ago

I liked them both, but I prefer King Arthur.

[–] cdull 16 years ago

If I want to see a film about King Arthur I'll watch Excalibur.

Josh

[–] lillychr14 16 years ago

10,000 B.C. was piss poor King Arthur was just poor.

this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules.

[–] TexasJohnBapster 16 years ago

Verily I say unto thee...KING ARTHUR for sure.

[–] irishpepa 16 years ago

MMMMMMMMMMM
that's a tuffy one....................NONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!duhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!

VICTIMS............AREN'T WE ALL?(the crow)

[–] Boromir007 16 years ago

King Arthur - 7/10
It wasn't a masterpiece but it was entertaining and intresting. It was well put-together.

10,000 BC - 1/10
Absolutely laughable picture that doesn't make any sense.

"What If" is a game for scholars.
Timothy Dalton, The Lion in Winter (1968)

[–] One_of_Us_is_the_Killer 13 years ago

Took the words right off my keyboard.