MovieChat Forums > Film History and Meaning > 1, 2, and 3 Dimensional Characterization...

1, 2, and 3 Dimensional Characterization: How Do You Tell Them Apart


What are the qualities that define these terms?

reply

There is no such thing as a one-dimensional character. You cannot draw a portrait if you have only length and no width.

reply

I meant characterization.

reply

There is no such thing as one-dimensional characterization. Two dimensions is the minimum.

reply

I often heard it get throw around.

reply



null

reply

One test that has often been used is, do you know the character's thoughts? Granted that is a little facile and there are many debatable cases, but it is a starting point. As I said above, the distinction is between flat and round characters, i.e. two-dimensional and three-dimensional. There is no such thing as a one-dimensional character. You cannot draw a portrait if you have only length and no width.

reply

1-Dimensional are as basic as they can get. You've seen them a bunch of time before, and you can even predict what they'll do.

2-Dimensional have personalities that you can't just describe in one word.

3-Dimensional require essays to be analysed. Their actions don't make sense to the audience at first sight.

reply

Thanks!

reply