MovieChat Forums > Film History and Meaning > Do Graphic Horror Films Lead to Violent ...

Do Graphic Horror Films Lead to Violent Crimes?


This is my first post here so I hope I've put it in the right place, apologies if I haven't.

As part of a project for Film Studies I needed primary research. I thought the best and most effective way to get it was by posting here and finding out your opinions on whether 'Horror fiction has any affect on society'. Violence and the media have always been quite closely linked with murder cases such as the 'James Bulger' and the 'Lionel Tate/Tiffany Eunick' investigations.

The aim of my research is for me to come to a conclusion about whether I think that particularly graphic or violent horror films affect modern society through desensitization.

Sorry if it sounds quite vague but I didn't want my post to be too long, any help would be hugely appreciated! :)

reply

There must be some books/research done on that topic. If you just want opinions, I think graphic Horror films affect people differently and don't really lead to violence, in any significant way. Maybe once in a while.

Desensitization is an issue but that would be something that leads movie-watchers to not care about suffering in the world, rather than commit crimes themselves.

BTW this isn't a very busy board so you might want to try Film General with your question, it has a lot more participants.


"Did you make coffee...? Make it!"--Cheyenne.

reply

I personally don't believe that graphic violence in movies leads to crime or violence in real life. There was violence before movies and there are people who committed violent crimes without seeing graphic violence in movies.

reply

Only if the individual was already mentally unbalanced prior to having viewed such material. So, in short, no.

reply

No, they don't. Similarly, that's why they make porn: just like that, not to arouse people (and cash in from that).

We can't be lost; we don't know where we're going.
All that matters is that we're going.

reply

If you're doing research on this subject matter, I highly recommend checking out the history of A Clockwork Orange. Kubrick was harassed and abused by the media for the rest of his life after this one because of the number of young people who claimed inspiration from his film, which they wrongly interpreted. White power critics called Kubrick a creator of "crank" culture in Britain and America and stalked him the rest of his life, largely inspiring Eyes Wide Shut. A Clockwork Orange had nothing at all in it that would obligate viewers to follow him, and criticisms like this, even with criminal confessions of being inspired by Kubrick, when held up to scrutiny, largely demonstrate the same pattern of violent outbreak and public panic that groundbreaking filmmakers like Orson Welles, Alfred Hitchcock, Martin Scorsese, and Quentin Tarantino supposedly "inspired." All of these filmmakers are considered legendery, especially Kubrick, despite "inspiring" some of the most publicized violence and criminality associated with its misinterpretation; and you can backtrack all of those claims and find stories associated with each filmmaker like this. But ever film history student knows those directors would have never made history had they been held back.

"You were acting like a different person." -Sheila, Lost Highway

reply

White power critics called Kubrick a creator of "crank" culture in Britain and America and stalked him the rest of his life,

What is "crank culture"?

reply

The fact that there was violence before movies doesn't mean movies can't provoke violence. One doesn't follow from the other, as violent behavior can have many causes independent of each other.

My real name is Jeff

reply