MovieChat Forums > Plays > I saw William Shakespeare's THE TEMPEST.

I saw William Shakespeare's THE TEMPEST.


I admit that I had a bit of a hard time following the plot since English isn't my native language. I'm fluent, but the one in this play is different, because of the time period.

People always talk about Shakespeare as the synonym of sophisticated theatre (even in comedy). So imagine my surpise to see a fart joke. Yeah, the humour was too low-brow for my taste. Speaking of, I felt like I was watching 2 plays. The scenes with PROSPERO, MIRANDA, ARIEL and FERDINAND and the scenes with CALIBAN, TRINCULO and STEPHANO don't fit. There were also times were some characters began to sing, but it didn't seem like a "musical genre universe", so it felt out of place. I'm not a history expert, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't common for plays of the time to show supernatural elements in realistic settings. That made me admire the magic acts. If only I had cared about any of the characters.

The acting was mostly good. Jonathan Kemp and Cory English's performances were the best. Eleanor Russo's is the only one I didn't like.

Funny story: I live in Rome, but my level of Italian isn't high enough to watch a play (or a movie without subtitles). Therefore, when I read that the Bedouin Shakespeare Company was coming here to present a play in English, I thought it would be a unique opportunity. The theatre I went to is like a stadium. It's round and roofless, but the stage and the seats are covered. I bought a ticket for the 1st level. What a coincidence that it was raining because, since the theatre wasn't full, they moved us to the 2nd level... where there's a better view! And that's not the only coincidence. The play I saw had to do with rain.

reply

To try and answer some of your questions:

The Golden Age of British Theatre (which lasted about 75 years, one lengthy lifetime) began in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I and continued through her successor, King James I.

The plays of that time were free-wheeling affairs. There were often scenes alternating between serious business or restrained courtly love among nobility and separate scenes – and subplots – featuring working class, servants, rural folk, etc. Shakespeare was an important innovator in how he integrated the “high and low” comedy elements. Witness Dogberry and his Night Watch in “Much Ado About Nothing.” They bumble around trying to keep the peace but, almost by accident, become the ones who uncover the villain’s plot and save the day. The culmination of Shakespeare’s art in this regard is The Fool (court jester) from his greatest tragedy, “King Lear.”

Whereas the ancient Greeks and Romans, so admired by the educated of Shakespeare’s time, kept very strict rules on what could or could not be in a play (e.g. the unities of time and place), Elizabethan and Jacobean playwrights did pretty much what they wanted as long as they didn’t step on powerful people’s toes.

Music and singing was always part of Shakespearean writing. I have read that “As You Like It” has the most songs of any of his plays (I haven’t personally gone through all the Plays and counted the musical numbers). Also, at the beginning of the period, it was common for the acting companies’ comedian to come out after the play was over (even a very serious tragedy) and do a “jig” – a comic dance routine that involved singing and reciting bawdy songs and poems. Again, there is evidence that Shakespeare had something to do with reforming this practice while integrating the comedy with the more serious.

About 1599, the star comedian of The Lord Chamberlain’s Men (Shakespeare’s company), named Will Kempe, sold his shares in the company and parted ways with them. Around that same year, “Hamlet” was first performed. In that play, Hamlet instructs the band of roving actors to “let those that play your clowns speak no more than is set down for them; for there be of them that will themselves laugh, to set on some quantity of barren spectators to laugh too; though, in the mean time, some necessary question of the play be then to be considered: that's villainous, and shows a most pitiful ambition in the fool that uses it.” A lot of people see a breach there between Kempe and Shakespeare’s new approach. In Shakespeare’s work into the 1600s, the purely comic relief drops out more and more. Yet, in “The Tempest,” in sort of a retro way, the funny guys are again alternating scenes with the main plot, although Trinculo and Stephano do have a part to play other than showing comical terror.

I’ve probably gone on too much but I hope these ramblings give a better picture of what plays were like in the Early Modern period.

mf

Trust me. I’m The Doctor.

reply

Thanks!

reply