MovieChat Forums > Politics > How many operations and incidents would'...

How many operations and incidents would've been considered 'conspiracy theory'

posted 4 years ago by Kompressor (240)
8 replies | jump to latest

until the government came out and admitted they happened?

MK Ultra and Operation Paperclip spring to mind. You think the state department just held a press conference and said "Yeah we smashed those nazis good... but now some of them are working with us with access to quite a bit of top secret information"

And people are retarded enough to call you a conspiracy theorist for asking for a single video of a plane hitting the Pentagon.

[–] TimMC (9143) 4 years ago

All of them. LOL.

The Continental Super Highway is a fun one.
The US gov and States gov were gonna help pay for this debacle to send a lot of the imported goods for the US and Canada through Mexico and have a super highway from Mexico through the USA and into Canada. For years people talked about it and were berated and made fun of for passing on conspiracy theories until one day it slipped out.
Some of the scumbags admitted the plan but for the most part the media stayed quiet and politicians kept their mouth shut.

There is still no super highway from Mexico to Canada.

PS. Yes I know you can drive from Mexico to Canada.

[–] Redsfan001 (6147) 4 years ago

The reason you don't see the video of the plane hitting the Pentagon is because it has been deemed classified, it probably will be for a good 30 years, maybe more.

This action has historical precedent.

The films of the Japaneese kamikaze attacks late in WWII weren't released to the public until 1974.

[–] Kompressor (240) 4 years ago

Yeah, no. It wouldn't be classified because a plane hitting the pentagon is the official story.

The only reason to hide it is because it wasn't a plane

[–] Redsfan001 (6147) 4 years ago

Yeah, no. The propaganda value of a jumbo jet hitting the Pentagon would be used as a recruitment tool for radical Islam and indirectly cost American lives.

We also don't know if missiles of any sort were launched in defense of the Pentagon.

[–] Kompressor (240) 4 years ago

You're assuming it was an Islamic attack to assume that they're keeping it classified.

Occam's razor.

[–] Redsfan001 (6147) 4 years ago

Any attack on the Pentagon would be classified, regardless.

You do not want to let your enemies know your weaknesses.

[–] Kompressor (240) 4 years ago

They know exactly where it supposedly hit and the damage was detailed in the 9/11 commission report.

You're shilling really hard for them NOT releasing evidence that would supposedly confirm what they say happened anyway. Imagine being on a jury and having the prosecutor tell you "Well we have video of the defendant doing exactly what we're charging him with...but you can't see it"

[–] Redsfan001 (6147) 4 years ago

😀 because even if the Pentagon did relase the video, people would still not believe it, calling it a deep fake.

I also understand the need for classification in this matter, because Russia and China would LOVE to analyze the video probing for weaknesses.

Comrade.