FOX News whines that no one is taking Bobulinski and the 'Hunter Biden' conspiracy seriously - Politics Discussion

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 4 years ago

1997: Blue dress
2004: Swift Boat
2008: Bill Ayers
2012: Benghazi
2016: Emails
2020: Laptop

It's getting old. Glad to see the media is getting tired of it too.

reply

[–] zaq123 (2389) 4 years ago

Yeah it must be tiresome being so dishonest and biased all the time.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Are you suggesting that is why Trump looked so burnt out during the debate ? I thought it was the ludes he was on, but I think you're on to something. 4 years of telling lies and being biased probably has wiped him out. Good one zaq!

reply

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 4 years ago

Trump: Tax returns show him paying over $150,000 in taxes to China, and he has a known Chinese bank account.

Biden: An email involving Hunter talking about a "big guy" who some guy claims is Joe with no proof.

The reality is you already know Trump is guilty, and you are hoping Biden is too. But you're stuck. You can't get beyond Hunter, and neither can Trump's FBI.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

The Hunter story is their last grasp at trying to win the election. Problem is, no one cares - especially not undecided and independent voters. They're concerned with 8 milliion Americans out of work, thousands of 'mom and pop' businesses closing up, not being able to pay their own rents and mortgages, and 225,000 dead from COVID.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

2018: Mexican caravan! They're coming for your wives and children!

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

1997: Did Clinton commit perjury, yes or no?
2004: How many purple hearts did Kerry win? How did he earn each, pray tell? Were they deserved?
2008: You should've said ACORN. That was corrupt.
2012: Why does Clinton say one thing to her family and another thing to the American people, pray tell?
2016: Why does Clinton bleach her hard drive AFTER her files were subpoenaed, pray tell?
2020: If it's nothing, then why isn't the MSM covering it? Asking questions to clear up the story?

You're not too smart to list obvious faults and errors of the dems. How you support and obviously corrupt party only shows how indoctrinated you are, white guilt.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

"if I put "pray tell" I sound intelligent!"

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

I still fail to any answers to my questions.

Go ahead and post your chepooka. It only proves you’re an idiot. Maybe you’ll realize it.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Speaking of proving idiocy:

"I still fail to any answers to my questions."

WTF is that supposed to mean ?

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

You don’t know what that means???

You’re not that smart, are you dogdump? Then again, what else is new?

reply

[–] christomacin (4655) 4 years ago

He's back with the "cheepoka" again. Does he have these phrases on a timed rotation or something? They seem to disappear for a while and come back at regular intervals.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

LOL! I guess the Russians have this bot stuck on a loop.

reply

[–] christomacin (4655) 4 years ago

And what is "chepooka", anyway? Is that some "A Clockwork Orange" Droog-speak or something? Well, the author Anthony Burgess did base Nasdat on Russian, so I can't say I'm surprised.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

We get it. you've seen clockwork orange. You are soo cool lol... cringe

You are what? 60 years old? and clearly suffering from delusions of conspiracies.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

So where’s the answers, pal? I’m still waiting.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

next up "bucko"

im sorry i dont have time to research dozens of articles and make fun of your conspiracy nonsense but I will address one

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/08/fact-check-trump-pence-fbi-clinton-email-probe/89996046/

Its total nonsense. its totally made up. no bleaching, no acid washing of hardrives.

sorry you take trumps rantings over the FBIs

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Seriously???

That’s the best you got? So why couldn’t she present her files to the hearing?

Damn! Shameless idiocy!

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

Im sorry facts and reality disagree with you.. and this triggers you. next time come up with actual facts. Instead of delusions in your head based of trump rants.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Then answer the question?

Why couldn’t Clinton present her files subpoenaed by congress?

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

You clearly dont crap about the topic. so much so you presented a made-up story about bleaching hard rives. please be quiet for now on

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Just answer the question instead of evading it.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

Its not evading. The problem is from comment #1 You've shown to be a dishonest actor peddling conspiracy theory nonsense.

I dont i have time to lookup every damn claim you make because now I know you cant be trusted. enjoy your night. stay off Alex jones kid

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

What is the conspiracy theory, exactly?

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

That her hard rives were bleached or destroyed by acid.

again I am not going to a argue because I cant research every new conspiracy you believe in

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

I see. The conspiracy theory is arguing semantics. The point is, her hard drives were destroyed after they were subpoenaed. Can you refute that? I didn't think so.

Now just look sad and say D'oh.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

No its not semantics. its fundamental. You believe in nonsense garbage. I dont have time to in depth research every single claim. I looked up one out 6 and it was total nonsense>

I dont have time to argue with a mouth breathing simpleton so easilyy confused and who cant even bother to do 2 minutes of their own research before spreading lies.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Did Clinton present her subpoenaed files to congress? No. Why not? Because she destroyed them to the point where they were unretrievable. That's a fact. And yet you think it's a conspiracy theory. Why? Because they weren't "bleached".

Again, that's the best you got? You're not too smart, are you?

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

Go back to high school kid.

you need to start over.

No its not a conspiracy theory because they weren't bleached.

its a conspiracy theory because they never were and you were pushing the nonsense.

LOL how dumb are you?? seriously man. Go back to highschool and start over. Enjoy being dumb and pushing nonsense man. Thats how people take you seriously

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

You keep saying your done and not going to waste your time, and yet you keep posting a reply. Kind of contradictory aren't you?

It's not a CT because they weren't bleached, but is because they never were???

WTF does that even mean??? And I'm the dumb one. 😂😂😂😂

And they weren't presented to congress after they were subpoenaed, why again? Yeah.

You're really doing yourself a favor and showing off your shameless idiocy. Just FYI. Just look sad and say D'oh.

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

you must be slow.

you said they were bleached. that's the conspiracy theory. not that they were destroyed. again spaz, go back to school.

words are tough for you

lol say d'oh? honestly are you retarded?

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Okay. Your conspiracy theory is about semantics. Duly noted, dunce. 🤪🤪🤪

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

deleting emails vs bleaching and using acid and destroying hard rives is "semantics"

honwst question. are you retarded? not even joking. since you clearly dont know what semantics means either.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

It’s too late for you to recover from displaying your dunceness. Just FYI.🤪🤪🤪

reply

[–] djangounlamed (1769) 4 years ago

doesn't know what the word semantics means. calls someone else a dunce.

retard confirmed

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Poor Eric suffers from autism. We determined that a while ago. Be gentle with him.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

He's 72 years old.

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7717) 4 years ago

Eric’s 72?

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Yup. User '548': he was born in May, 1948.

reply

[–] snepts (11123) 4 years ago

Gary Hart was sabotaged by Lee Atwater back in the day. Atwater confessed to it on his death bed, complete smear job.

reply

[–] zaq123 (2389) 4 years ago

LOL at first I thought you wrote "Kamala's a bitch".

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

You did ? You need to make an appointment with your optometrist, before Amy Coney Barrett takes your health insurance away.

reply

[–] zaq123 (2389) 4 years ago

No that's not what it is. She is...a bitch. Crazy too.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

I agree - but the republican senate approved her nomination to the Supreme Court. Dems have warned them what a crazy bitch Amy is, but they're rushing her through.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Oh? Why is ACB a crazy bitch, pray tell dogdump?

As usual, you won't have anything. You'll just throw out a witless insult and run away with your tail between your legs...again.

Now just look sad and say D'oh.😢😢😢

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Auntie Maryanne called you A PUBLIC MORON. Why'd she do that ?

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Damn! I'm clairvoyant! 🤣🤣🤣

Now just look sad and say D'oh. 😥😥😥

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

No, you're just a PUBLIC MORON.

reply

[–] TimMC (9143) 4 years ago

Russia Russia Russia.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

"Marcia, Marcia, Marcia !"

reply

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

Trump openly admires and panders to Vladimir Putin, hence why people bring the subject of Russia up when mentioning Trump.

A majority of Americans have a big problem with that...as we should.

reply

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

The writing is on the wall and Trump looks likely to lose the election.

You'd think FOX would start distancing themselves by now.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

They have to support their future employee.

reply

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

HaHaHa! Trump will join Hannity perhaps?

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

'The Trump & Hannity Hour' ! It will be an incredible comedy / variety hour, broadcast remotely from Trump's prison cell. Tucker and Judge Jeanine can be the permanent guests each night !

reply

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

Oh my god the horror that would be!

That would make for a fun drinking game. You could take a shot for every time Trump/Hannity told a lie. :)

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

You'd be drunk before the first commercial.

reply

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

And alcohol poisoning by the end, I'm sure.

reply

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

Well you have to admit that is anti democrat news. The needs of the pungent people in that area of wanting is greater. this would hardly change a mind of a pudgy welfare dependent person.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

"Well you have to admit that is anti democrat news." = "It's pro-republican news." = "It's conspiracy bullshit."

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 4 years ago

Most people are rightly more concerned with the source: Giuliani and his hotel room wardrobe malfunction!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRKlvh2b1t0

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

reply

[–] stickman38 (3346) 4 years ago

We all know that if the shoe was on the other foot it would be front page news on every network.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

No, they don't engage in conspiracy theories. Especially ones in which the reporters have distanced themselves from this piece of crap, and won't even put their names on the byline for credit.

FOX, however, is not reporting factual news: Trump has been paying taxes to China and has had a 'secret bank account' in China.

As Obama said it the other day, if it was he who was caught paying taxes to China and had a secret bank account there, FOX would be calling him 'Bejing Barry'.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

Russia collusion was a conspiracy theory. Proven. Who covered it? The entire MSM. Twitter and Facebook allowed it all.

Duuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........

Now just look sad and say D'oh.

reply

[–] stickman38 (3346) 4 years ago

lol... Russia and Ukraine were the biggest conspiracy theories of all time. And here we are with actual evidence and the media is just blowing it off. pffftt... whatever.

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7717) 4 years ago

We all see what we want to see..., but the Russia and Ukraine "conspiracies" had a lot of convincing evidence.

Read the Mueller Report.

reply

[–] User548 (2068) 4 years ago

All based on the Steele dossier which was created by the Clinton campaign. MSM bought that hook, line and sinker.

Duhhhhhhhhhhh.....

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Funny how those conspiracy theories got Trump impeached in his first term.

reply